Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 7161 - 7180 of 7539
T.W. and G.M. v. Slovakia
T.W. and G.M. v. Slovakia CCPR/C/110/D/1963/2010 Communication number s : 1963/2010 Author: T.W. and G.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country Slovakia Submission date 23 Feb 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1963/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1812/en-US
T v. Australia
T v. Australia CAT/C/58/D/599/2014 Communication number s : 599/2014 Author: T Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Australia Submission date 30 Apr 2014 Date of decision 03 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/58/D/599/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3011/en-US
T v. New Zealand
T v. New Zealand CCPR/C/125/D/2684/2015 Communication number s : 2684/2015 Author: T Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Jun 2015 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2684/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3316/en-US
TADDEUCCI AND MC CALL v. Italy
TADDEUCCI AND MC CALL v. Italy ITA 30/09/2016 00:00:00 08/02/2018 14:24:52 Case Description: Discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation: Refusal to grant a residence permit for family reason to a same sex foreign partner due to the treatment of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45551
TAGANROG LRO AND OTHERS v. Russia
TAGANROG LRO AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 09/07/2022 00:00:00 19/09/2022 09:34:09 Case Description: This group of cases Taganrog LRO concerns violation of various rights of the Jehovah s Witnesses. The case of Taganrog LRO concerns violation of various rights EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61031
TAMER TANRIKULU v. Turkey
TAMER TANRIKULU v. Turkey TUR 29/11/2016 00:00:00 12/12/2016 17:18:54 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial on account of the refusal of the Supreme Military Administrative Court to allow the applicant to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45565
TAMMINEN v. Finland
TAMMINEN v. Finland FIN 05/07/2004 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair hearing on account of domestic courts refusal to hear a particular witness in two instances on different EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4842
TARARIYEVA v. Russia
TARARIYEVA v. Russia RUS 14/03/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Authorities failure to protect the right to life of the applicant s son due to the lack of adequate medical care in prison and defective medical assistance at a public EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13715
TARSASAG A SZABADSAGJOGOKERT v. Hungary
TARSASAG A SZABADSAGJOGOKERT v. Hungary HUN 14/07/2009 00:00:00 03/11/2016 08:47:27 Case Description: Freedom to receive information: Interference with the applicant association s freedom of information a non governmental organisation active in the field EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11336
TASEV v. North Macedonia
TASEV v. North Macedonia MKD 16/08/2019 00:00:00 26/08/2019 11:34:26 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unforeseeable interference due to the authorities refusal in 2012 to grant the applicant s request to have his ethnicity entry in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52659
TATISHVILI v. Russia
TATISHVILI v. Russia RUS 09/07/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Freedom of movement and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful refusal to register the applicant as resident at her home address and failure by domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13641
TELE 1 PRIVATFERNSEH v. Austria
TELE 1 PRIVATFERNSEH v. Austria AUT 19/01/2001 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the refusal to allow the applicant company to set up and operate a television transmitter. Article 10 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-843
TELIATNIKOV v. Lithuania
TELIATNIKOV v. Lithuania LTU 07/09/2022 00:00:00 19/09/2022 09:34:09 Case Description: This case concerns the unjustified refusal in 2015 to exempt conscientious objector a Jehovah s witness from compulsory military service and the unavailability of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61139
TENDAM v. Spain
TENDAM v. Spain ESP 13/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 09:41:36 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Infringement of the presumption of innocence resulting in refusal to award compensation for pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5736
TERNOVSKIS v. Latvia
TERNOVSKIS v. Latvia LVA 29/07/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:08 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings in which the applicant contested the authorities refusal to grant the necessary security clearance and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31176
THLIMMENOS v. Greece
THLIMMENOS v. Greece GRC 06/04/2000 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Discrimination on religious grounds / access to and effective functioning of justice: Discriminatory treatment of the applicant due to the authorities refusal to appoint EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22168
TICU v. Romania
TICU v. Romania ROU 01/01/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants in various prisons due to the inadequate management of their severe psychiatric conditions from 2003 to 2019. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13270
TOLMACHEV v. Estonia
TOLMACHEV v. Estonia EST 09/10/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:50:37 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Domestic court s refusal to examine the applicant s complaint against a misdemeanour fine imposed by the police on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3053
TOMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
TOMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 09/07/2019 00:00:00 25/07/2019 15:06:12 Case Description: These cases concern a structural problem highlighted by the European Court applying the pilot judgment procedure of inhuman and degrading treatment caused by the poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52617
TOPCIC-ROSENBERG v. Croatia
TOPCIC ROSENBERG v. Croatia HRV 24/03/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Discrimination: Refusal of the Croatian Health Insurance Fund and the Administrative Court in 2006 2009 to grant an adoptive self employed mother maternity leave EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12381