Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 7381 - 7400 of 7539
Vladimir Schumilin v. Belarus
Vladimir Schumilin v. Belarus CCPR/C/105/D/1784/2008 Communication number s : 1784/2008 Author: Vladimir Schumilin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Belarus Submission date 17 Mar 2005 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1784/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1469/en-US
Voronkov v. Russian Federation
Voronkov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/136/D/2951/2017 Communication number s : 2951/2017 Author: Dmitry Voronkov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country Russian Federation Submission date 09 Jan 2017 Date of decision 25 Oct 2022 JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/2951/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3549/en-US
W.B.E. v. Netherlands
W.B.E. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/46/D/432/1990 Communication number s : 432/1990 Author: W.B.E. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 46 Country Netherlands Submission date 20 Jul 1990 Date of decision 23 Oct 1992 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/46/D/432/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/473/en-US
W.E.O. v. Sweden
W.E.O. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2741/2016 Communication number s : 2741/2016 Author: W.E.O. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2741/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2844/en-US
W.M.C v. Denmark
W.M.C v. Denmark CRC/C/85/D/31/2017 Communication number s : 031/2017 Author: W.M.C Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Online limited session Country Denmark Submission date 08 Aug 2017 Date of decision 28 Sep 2020 Comment: This document JUTBCRC/C/85/D/31/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2748/en-US
W.M.G. v. Canada
W.M.G. v. Canada CCPR/C/116/D/2060/2011 Communication number s : 2060/2011 Author: W.M.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Canada Submission date 10 May 2011 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2060/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3538/en-US
WAGNER AND J.M.W.L. v. Luxemburg
WAGNER AND J.M.W.L. v. Luxemburg LUX 28/09/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Protection of family life access to and efficient functioning of justice and discrimination: Refusal to enforce a full adoption order by a foreign court in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-117
WALCZAK v. Poland
WALCZAK v. Poland POL 09/07/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unnecessary interference due to the authorities refusal of family visits by the applicant s wife during detention. Article 8 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55603
WALLISHAUSER v. Austria
WALLISHAUSER v. Austria AUT 19/11/2012 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Domestic courts denied to acknowledge deemed service against a foreign State made in accordance with rules of customary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-551
WELLER v. Hungary
WELLER v. Hungary HUN 30/06/2009 00:00:00 03/11/2016 08:47:27 Case Description: Protection of privation and family life and discrimination: Refusal of maternity benefits because the mother of the children had not been eligible on account of her EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11342
WESOLEK v. Poland
WESOLEK v. Poland POL 13/06/2019 00:00:00 27/06/2019 16:34:02 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court on account of the refusal of the applicant s request for full exemption from court fees to challenge EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52320
WIECZOREK v. Poland
WIECZOREK v. Poland POL 08/03/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court to challenge refusal to grant legal aidwithout proper examination. Status of Execution: The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18849
WLOCH v. Poland (no. 2)
WLOCH v. Poland no. 2 POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Refusal of a domestic court to grant compensation under the relevant provisions for the applicant s unlawful detention on remand. Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39929
Warda Osman Jasin v. Denmark
Warda Osman Jasin v. Denmark CCPR/C/114/D/2360/2014 Communication number s : 2360/2014 Author: Warda Osman Jasin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Denmark Submission date 17 Mar 2014 Date of decision 22 Jul 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2360/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2022/en-US
Warsame v. Canada
Warsame v. Canada CCPR/C/102/D/1959/2010 Communication number s : 1959/2010 Author: Jama Warsame Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 102 Country Canada Submission date 26 Jul 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2011 Comment: On 27 July 2010 the JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1959/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1639/en-US
Weiss v. Austria
Weiss v. Austria CCPR/C/77/D/1086/2002 Communication number s : 1086/2002 Author: Sholam Weiss Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Austria Submission date 24 May 2002 Date of decision 03 Apr 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of its rules JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/1086/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1048/en-US
Weiss v. Austria
Weiss v. Austria CCPR/C/106/D/1821/2008 Communication number s : 1821/2008 Author: Sholam Weiss Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Austria Submission date 12 May 2008 Date of decision 24 Oct 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule 91 of JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/1821/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1428/en-US
Westerman v. Netherlands
Westerman v. Netherlands CCPR/C/67/D/682/1996 Communication number s : 682/1996 Author: Paul Westerman Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Netherlands Submission date 22 Nov 1995 Date of decision 03 Nov 1999 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/67/D/682/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/838/en-US
Wilson v. Australia
Wilson v. Australia CCPR/C/80/D/1239/2004 Communication number s : 1239/2004 Author: John Wilson Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Australia Submission date 20 Mar 2004 Date of decision 01 Apr 2004 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1239/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1064/en-US
Winata and Li v. Australia
Winata and Li v. Australia CCPR/C/72/D/930/2000 Communication number s : 930/2000 Author: Hendrick Winata and So Lan Li Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Australia Submission date 11 May 2000 Date of decision 26 Jul 2001 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/72/D/930/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/929/en-US