Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 71
11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 12 February 2002 in accordance UNIV-11-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
A/HRC/47/10: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Nepal
United Nations A/HRC/47/10 General Assembly Distr.: General 30 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/10https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4710-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-nepal
A/HRC/47/14: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Rwanda
United Nations A/HRC/47/14 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/14https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4714-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-rwanda
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24027/07 11949/08 36742/08 66911/09 67354/09 PEIRCE G. COOPER B. ARANI M. JONES A. BRANDON B. RAJA A. JONES J. GBR 4/10/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD002402707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110267
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF HARKINS AND EDWARDS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HARKINS AND EDWARDS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9146/07 32650/07 Aslam Y. Rasool L. GBR 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Extradition Conditional United States of America No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD000914607https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108599
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24724/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002472494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58593
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24888/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002488894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58594
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 66069/09 130/10 3896/10 CREIGHTON S. WEATHERBY P. VAN ZYL SMIT D. WOODS B. HORWELL R. HINDMARSH L. CHIVERS SOLICITORS BINGLEY McKONE M. GBR 7/9/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD006606909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122664
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 66069/09 130/10 3896/10 CREIGHTON S. WOODS B. Chivers Solicitors GBR 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading punishment Inhuman ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD006606909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108610
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 005)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 005 005 Rome 1950 11 04T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and for accession by the European Union Rome 1953 09 03T00:00:00 10 COEETS No. 005https://rm.coe.int/1680a2353d
Convention on Cybercrime (ETS No. 185)
Convention on Cybercrime ETS No. 185 185 Budapest 2001 11 23T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and the non member States which have participated in its elaboration and for accession by other non member States Budapest 2004 07 COEETS No. 185https://rm.coe.int/1680081561
Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons (ETS No. 112)
Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons ETS No. 112 112 Strasbourg 1983 03 21T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and the non member States which have participated in its elaboration and for accession by other non member States COEETS No. 112https://rm.coe.int/1680079529
Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the United States, holds general debate on the Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 18 March 2011 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on the United States and held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review. Harold Hongju Koh Legal Adviser of UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/03/council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-united-states-holds-general
Dumont v. Canada
Dumont v. Canada CCPR/C/98/D/1467/2006 Communication number s : 1467/2006 Author: Michel Dumont Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Canada Submission date 17 Mar 2006 Date of decision 16 Mar 2010 Comment: The text of an individual JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1467/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1582/en-US
F.A.J. and B.M.R.A. v. Spain
F.A.J. and B.M.R.A. v. Spain CCPR/C/130/D/3599/2019 Communication number s : 3599/2019 Author: F.A.J. and B.M.R.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Spain Submission date 14 Jan 2019 Date of decision 28 Oct 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3599/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3286/en-US
G. K. v. Netherlands
G. K. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008 Communication number s : 1801/2008 Author: G. K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Netherlands Submission date 30 Jul 2008 Date of decision 22 Mar 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1660/en-US
G. v. Australia
G. v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2172/2012 Communication number s : 2172/2012 Author: G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 02 Dec 2011 Date of decision 17 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2172/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2220/en-US
Gorji-Dinka v. Cameroon
Gorji Dinka v. Cameroon CCPR/C/83/D/1134/2002 Communication number s : 1134/2002 Author: Fongum Gorji Dinka Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Cameroon Submission date 14 Mar 2002 Date of decision 17 Mar 2005 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/83/D/1134/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1174/en-US