Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 4804
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015 Communication number s : 080/2014 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2425/en-US
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015 Communication number s : 080/2015 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Jan 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2636/en-US
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CRC/C/82/D/36/2017 Communication number s : 036/2017 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 82 Country Denmark Submission date 18 Oct 2017 Date of decision 26 Sep 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/82/D/36/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2599/en-US
A.S. v. Russian Federation
A.S. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/123/D/2232/2013 Communication number s : 2232/2013 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 123 Country Russian Federation Submission date 12 Jan 2013 Date of decision 19 Jul 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2232/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2537/en-US
A.S. v. Sweden
A.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/74/D/949/2019 Communication number s : 949/2019 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Jul 2019 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/74/D/949/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3611/en-US
A.W.P v. Denmark
A.W.P v. Denmark CCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009 Communication number s : 1879/2009 Author: A.W.P Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 109 Country Denmark Submission date 26 Mar 2009 Date of decision 01 Nov 2013 Comment: The text of an individual JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1678/en-US
A.W.R.A.P. v. Denmark
A.W.R.A.P. v. Denmark CERD/C/71/D/37/2006 Communication number s : 037/2006 Author: A.W.R.A.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Jul 2006 Date of decision 08 Aug 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/71/D/37/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1735/en-US
A and B v. Azerbaijan
A and B v. Azerbaijan CAT/C/74/D/905/2018 Communication number s : 905/2018 Author: A and B Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 22 Dec 2018 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/74/D/905/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3586/en-US
A and B v. Denmark v. Denmark
A and B v. Denmark v. Denmark CCPR/C/117/D/2291/2013 Communication number s : 2291/2013 Author: A and B Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Submission date 01 Oct 2013 Date of decision 13 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2291/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2128/en-US
A. and S.N. v. Norway
A. and S.N. v. Norway CCPR/C/33/D/224/1987 Communication number s : 224/1987 Author: A. and S.N. names deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 33 Country Norway Submission date 09 Mar 1987 Date of decision 11 Jul 1988 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/33/D/224/1987https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/528/en-US
Aïcha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria
A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria CCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011 Communication number s : 2086/2011 Author: A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache represented by Philippe Grant of Track Impunity Always TRIAL a Swiss association against impunity Type of decision: JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1911/en-US
A decency threshold for prisons – criteria for assessing conditions of detention
A decency threshold for prisons criteria for assessing conditions of detention fcn fk fkm fkmh fkmv fkrg fmpm ftb 2021 05 06 2018 04 19 European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CPT CPT/Inf 2021 5 CPTCPT/Inf(2021)5-parthttps://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-standards-inf-2021-5-part-en
A. v. Canada
A. v. Canada CAT/C/57/D/583/2014 Communication number s : 583/2014 Author: A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Canada Submission date 16 Dec 2014 Date of decision 09 May 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/57/D/583/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2115/en-US
A. v. Denmark
A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013 Communication number s : 53/2013 Author: A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Apr 2013 Date of decision 19 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3027/en-US
A v. New Zealand
A v. New Zealand CCPR/C/66/D/754/1997 Communication number s : 754/1997 Author: A Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country New Zealand Submission date 19 Apr 1996 Date of decision 15 Jul 1999 Comment: Individual opinion submitted by JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/754/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/802/en-US
ABDULLAH YALCIN (NO.2) v. Turkey
ABDULLAH YALCIN NO.2 v. Turkey TUR 14/09/2022 00:00:00 26/09/2022 09:53:59 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to freedom of religion on account of the high security prison s refusal to allow the applicant s request for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61181
ADYAN AND OTHERS v. Armenia
ADYAN AND OTHERS v. Armenia ARM 12/01/2018 00:00:00 13/02/2018 11:26:20 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Failure of authorities to make appropriate allowances for Jehovah s Witnesses conscience and their beliefs on the basis of which they refused to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48793
AGGA v. Greece (n° 3)
AGGA v. Greece n 3 GRC 13/10/2006 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:33:21 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Unjustified interference with the right to manifest one s religion due to the applicant s prosecution convictions for having usurped the functions of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-21688
AGHANYAN AND OTHERS v. Armenia
AGHANYAN AND OTHERS v. Armenia ARM 05/12/2019 00:00:00 13/12/2019 15:52:42 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Disproportionate interference due to failure to make allowances for the applicants conscience and beliefs as Jehovah s Witnesses and to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54381
AHMET ARSLAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
AHMET ARSLAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 04/10/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Freedom of thought conscience and religion: Disproportionate interference due to criminal convictions for wearing religious headgear and garments which were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37300