Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 62
A.N. v. Denmark
A.N. v. Denmark CCPR/C/116/D/2039/2011 Communication number s : 2039/2011 Author: A.N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 116 Country Denmark Submission date 31 Dec 2009 Date of decision 30 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2039/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3084/en-US
Ali v. Tunisia
Ali v. Tunisia CAT/C/41/D/291/2006 Communication number s : 291/2006 Author: Saadia Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 41 Country Tunisia Submission date 02 Mar 2006 Date of decision 21 Nov 2008 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/41/D/291/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/71/en-US
Bahadur Maharjan v. Nepal
Bahadur Maharjan v. Nepal CCPR/C/105/D/1863/2009 Communication number s : 1863/2009 Author: Dev Bahadur Maharjan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Nepal Submission date 31 Dec 2008 Date of decision 19 Jul 2012 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1863/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1238/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CASE OF AHMET HÜSREV ALTAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF AHMET H SREV ALTAN v. TURKEY 13252/17 ALBUGA ALIKU U F. TUR 4/13/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0413JUD001325217https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-209444
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY (No. 2) [Extracts]
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY No. 2 Extracts 24069/03 197/04 6201/06 10464/07 OTTY T. MULLER M. TUGLUK A. ERBAS D. DUNDAR I. KAPLAN H. TEPE M. KOSTAK F. AYDINKAYA F. GUNES O. BILMEZ I. KAYA B. TUR S. EMEKCI E. BILGIC K. KORKUT H. SAKAR M. YALCINDAG R. BULGAN N. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0318JUD002406903https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142087
CASE OF ŠEKERIJA v. CROATIA
CASE OF EKERIJA v. CROATIA 3021/14 UMI EVI M. PLANINI LJ. HRV 11/5/2020 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing 445 76 136 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1105JUD000302114 FIRST SECTIONCASE OF ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1105JUD000302114https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-205541
CASE OF FERNÁNDEZ MARTÍNEZ v. SPAIN
CASE OF FERN NDEZ MART NEZ v. SPAIN 56030/07 MAZON COSTA J.L. ESP 6/12/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for private life Agreement of 3 January 1979 between Spain and the Holy See ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0612JUD005603007https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145068
CASE OF H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
CASE OF H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE 24384/19 44234/20 DOS M. FRA 9/14/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Locus standi Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0914JUD002438419https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-219333
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA 60367/08 961/11 YERMOLAYEVA N. MARALYAN A. DAVIDYAN E. MOSKALENKO K. RUS 1/24/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 14 5 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 5 Right to liberty and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD006036708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170663
CASE OF N. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF N. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 26565/05 LUQMANI J.THOMPSON PARTNERS GBR 5/27/2008 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 in the event of the applicant being removed to Uganda 350 90 193 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0527JUD002656505 GRAND CHAMBER CASE OF N. v. THE ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0527JUD002656505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-86490
CASE OF OLIARI AND OTHERS v. ITALY
CASE OF OLIARI AND OTHERS v. ITALY 18766/11 36030/11 SCHUSTER A. D AMICO M. CLARA M. PITEA C. ITA 7/21/2015 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0721JUD001876611https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-156265
Cifuentes Elegueta v. Chile
Cifuentes Elegueta v. Chile CCPR/C/96/D/1536/2006 Communication number s : 1536/2006 Author: Mar a Cifuentes Elegueta Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 96 Country Chile Submission date 23 Sep 2006 Date of decision 28 Jul 2009 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1536/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1504/en-US
Conclusions XX-4 - Spain - Article 19-1
Conclusions XX 4 Spain Article 19 1 ESP 19 01 000 04/12/2015 27/01/2016 Article 19 Right of migrant workers and their families to protection and assistance Paragraph 1 Assistance and information on migration The Committee takes note of the information ESCXX-4/def/ESP/19/1/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XX-4/def/ESP/19/1/EN
Decision on the merits: Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE) v. Italy, Collective Complaint No. 58/2009
Decision on the merits: Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions COHRE v. Italy Collective Complaint No. 58/2009 ITA 16 00 000 19 01 000 19 04 000 19 08 000 30 00 163 31 01 163 31 02 163 31 03 163 25/06/2010 21/10/2010 European Committee of Social Rights ESCcc-58-2009-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-58-2009-dmerits-en
H.K. v. Norway
H.K. v. Norway CCPR/C/112/D/2004/2010 Communication number s : 2004/2010 Author: H.K. represented by counsel Christian B. Hjort and later by John Chr. Elden and Anders Brosveet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Norway Submission JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2004/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1898/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 11 June 2010 Holds General Debate on Universal Periodic Review Mechanism The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina following which it held a UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/2010/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-bosnia-and-herzegovina
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 11 June 2010 Holds General Debate on Universal Periodic Review Mechanism The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina following which it held a UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2010/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-bosnia-and
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on Paraguay and holds general debate on Universal Periodic Review process
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 9 June 2011 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on Paraguay which was followed by a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review process. Federico Gonzalez UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-paraguay-and
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the Netherlands and South Africa
Human Rights Council MORNING 21 September 2012 Hears Address by Foreign Minister of Australia and Human Rights Minister of Burkina Faso Continues Debate on Human Rights Bodies and Mechanisms The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-netherlands