Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1061 - 1080 of 1600
El Hagog Jumaa v. Libya
El Hagog Jumaa v. Libya CCPR/C/104/D/1755/2008/Rev.1 Communication number s : 1755/2008 Author: Ashraf Ahmad El Hagog Jumaa Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Libya Submission date 07 Jan 2008 Date of decision 19 Mar 2012 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1755/2008/Rev.1https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1614/en-US
Ernazarov v. Kyrgyzstan v. Kyrgyzstan
Ernazarov v. Kyrgyzstan v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/113/D/2054/2011 Communication number s : 2054/2011 Author: Mamatkarim Ernazarov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 11 Mar 2011 Date of decision 25 Mar 2015 JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2054/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1961/en-US
F.C.B. v. Italy
F.C.B. v. Italy ITA 28/08/1991 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of in absentia criminal proceedings due to impossibility of obtaining a fresh examination by a court of the merits of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45056
F.K. v. Denmark
F.K. v. Denmark CAT/C/70/D/743/2016 Communication number s : 743/2016 Author: F.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Apr 2016 Date of decision 30 Dec 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/70/D/743/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3403/en-US
F.M. v. Denmark
F.M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/130/D/2946/2017 Communication number s : 2946/2017 Author: F.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Denmark Submission date 01 Feb 2017 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2946/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3269/en-US
Fábryová v. Czech Republic
F bryov v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/73/D/765/1997 Communication number s : 765/1997 Author: Eliska F bryov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Czech Republic Submission date 28 May 1997 Date of decision 30 Oct 2001 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/73/D/765/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/940/en-US
FAZLIYSKI v. Bulgaria
FAZLIYSKI v. Bulgaria BGR 16/07/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair Supreme Administrative Court s proceedings due to its refusal to examine the assessment of the applicant s mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3879
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
FEDOTOVA v. Russia
FEDOTOVA v. Russia RUS 13/09/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention/protection against ill treatment/conditions of detention/ right of individual petition: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13573
FILYUTKIN v. Russia
FILYUTKIN v. Russia RUS 24/07/2018 00:00:00 11/10/2018 12:03:34 Case Description: This group concerns lack of impartiality of judges or juries in criminal proceedings against the applicants violation of Article 6 1 . In some cases the European Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50517
FLUX (NO. 2) v. the Republic of Moldova
FLUX NO. 2 v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 03/10/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interferences as a result of court decisions holding the applicants newspapers and journalists liable in tort for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6656
FRIDA, LLC v. Ukraine
FRIDA LLC v. Ukraine UKR 08/03/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:22:52 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court due to the excessive formalism in the Higher Commercial Court s refusal to review the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46267
FURCHT v. Germany
FURCHT v. Germany DEU 23/01/2015 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:24:56 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the applicant s conviction based on evidence obtained as a result of incitement by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38226
FYODOROV AND FYODOROVA v. Ukraine
FYODOROV AND FYODOROVA v. Ukraine UKR 07/10/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the ill treatment of both applicants husband and wife on account of the disproportionate use of force by the police on 7 March 2003 when EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31579
Fermín Navarro Presentación y Juana Medina Pascual v. Spain
Ferm n Navarro Presentaci n y Juana Medina Pascual v. Spain CRC/C/81/D/19/2017 Communication number s : 019/2017 Author: Ferm n Navarro Presentaci n y Juana Medina Pascual Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 81 Country Spain Submission JUTBCRC/C/81/D/19/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2747/en-US
Fifth Round Evaluation Report on Croatia
Fifth Round Evaluation Report on Croatia HRV 2020 12 06 2020 03 24 Adoption: 6 December 2019 Publication: 24 March 2020 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2019 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2019)1-FINAL-eng-Croatia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2019)1-FINAL-eng-Croatia-PUBLIC
First Opinion on Lithuania
First Opinion on Lithuania LTU ACFC/INF/OP/I 2003 008 2003 02 21 2003 09 25 Strasbourg 25 September 2003 ACFC/INF/OP/I 2003 008 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES OPINION ON LITHUANIA adopted on 21 FCNMACFC/INF/OP/I(2003)008https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=1st_OP_Lithuania_en
Follow-up report v. Argentina
Follow up report v. Argentina CED/C/19/3 Communication number s : 1/2013 Author: Type of decision: Follow up report Session No 19 Country Argentina Submission date Date of decision 25 Sep 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: JUTBCED/C/19/3https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3559/en-US
Follow-up report v. Argentina,Canada,Denmark,Mexico,Morocco,Switzerland
Follow up report v. Argentina Canada Denmark Mexico Morocco Switzerland CAT/C/66/3 Communication number s : 327/2007 606/2014 778/2016 500/2012 580/2014 742/2016 758/2016 811/2017 653/2015 477/2011 464/2011 Author: Type of decision: Follow up report JUTBCAT/C/66/3https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3591/en-US
Follow-up report v. Argentina,Denmark,Mexico,Morocco,Switzerland
Follow up report v. Argentina Denmark Mexico Morocco Switzerland CAT/C/67/3 Communication number s : 477/2011 606/2014 778/2016 500/2012 742/2016 758/2016 811/2017 653/2015 Author: Type of decision: Follow up report Session No 67 Country Argentina Denmark JUTBCAT/C/67/3https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3590/en-US