Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2121 - 2140 of 2528
PONOMARENKO v. Ukraine
PONOMARENKO v. Ukraine UKR 14/09/2007 00:00:00 07/11/2016 14:16:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of justice due to the unjustified refusal by the domestic courts to consider the applicant s claim against local EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26164
PONOMARYOV v. Ukraine
PONOMARYOV v. Ukraine UKR 29/09/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Functioning of justice and protection of property rights: Breach of the legal certainty principle resulting from the unjustified extension of the time limits for appeal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31358
POP AND OTHERS v. Romania
POP AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 24/06/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of independence and impartiality of the military courts which convicted civilians for trafficking in visa. Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17580
POPOV v. the Republic of Moldova (no. 2)
POPOV v. the Republic of Moldova no. 2 MDA 06/03/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concern the violation of the applicants right to a fair hearing on account of the quashing of domestic final judgments between 2004 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6810
POPOVICI v. the Republic of Moldova
POPOVICI v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 02/06/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of two cases concerns the violation of the applicants right to a fair trial on account of the Supreme Court s quashing of their acquittals and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6668
POSTOLACHE v. Romania (no. 2)
POSTOLACHE v. Romania no. 2 ROU 22/11/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to court due to excessive court fees. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17091
POTCOAVA v. Romania
POTCOAVA v. Romania ROU 17/03/2014 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Denial of a fair trial: Criminal conviction to a prison sentence on the basis of statements made while in police custody in the absence of a legal counsel Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17591
POZDER v. Croatia
POZDER v. Croatia HRV 13/01/2022 00:00:00 20/01/2022 18:20:37 Case Description: This case concerns violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial on account of the fact that between 2013 2015 the domestic courts failed to grant the applicant the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59379
PRAMOV v. Bulgaria
PRAMOV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/12/2004 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court to obtain a decision on the lawfulness of the applicants dismissal from the Bulgarian State EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14611
PREBIL v. Slovenia
PREBIL v. Slovenia SVN 19/06/2019 00:00:00 17/07/2019 15:36:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair trial due to the applicant s inability to participate in proceedings concerning a motion to deprive him of his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52523
PRIKYAN AND ANGELOVA v. Bulgaria
PRIKYAN AND ANGELOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 16/05/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Lack of adversarial proceedings before the Supreme Court of Cassation due to the inability to submit arguments EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14607
PRODANOV v. North Macedonia
PRODANOV v. North Macedonia MKD 10/06/2021 00:00:00 11/06/2021 17:47:07 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to access to a court because of the manner in which the Supreme Court in 2012 applied the Civil Procedure Act EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57731
PROJECT-TRADE D.O.O. v. Croatia
PROJECT TRADE D.O.O. v. Croatia HRV 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: This case concerns the unlawful interference with the applicant company s right to peaceful enjoyment of its possessions due to the cancellation and revocation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57449
PROSHKIN v. Russia
PROSHKIN v. Russia RUS 09/07/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern unlawful detention of persons of unsound mind during and after criminal proceedings against them in different regions between 2003 and 2006 violation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13767
PULJIC v. Croatia
PULJIC v. Croatia HRV 08/10/2020 00:00:00 15/10/2020 16:39:02 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal or minor offence proceedings due to the inability for the applicant to examine a key witness whose statement was of decisive importance EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56073
PYRGIOTAKIS v. Greece
PYRGIOTAKIS v. Greece GRC 29/09/2008 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due to the conviction of the applicant for drug trafficking following active incitement by a police EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22660
Pestaño v. Philippines
Pesta o v. Philippines CCPR/C/98/D/1619/2007 Communication number s : 1619/2007 Author: Felipe and Evelyn Pesta o Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Philippines Submission date 24 Apr 2007 Date of decision 23 Mar 2010 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1619/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1564/en-US
Pham v. Canada
Pham v. Canada CCPR/C/93/D/1534/2006 Communication number s : 1534/2006 Author: The Trinh Pham Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 93 Country Canada Submission date 18 Jul 2006 Date of decision 22 Jul 2008 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1534/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1009/en-US
Protocol No. 7 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 117)
Protocol No. 7 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 117 117 Strasbourg 1984 11 22T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 5 Strasbourg 1988 11 01T00:00:00 7 COEETS No. 117https://rm.coe.int/168007a082
Q.A. v. Sweden
Q.A. v. Sweden CCPR/C/127/D/3070/2017 Communication number s : 3070/2017 Author: Q.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 127 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 30 Oct 2019 Comment: A joint opinion by Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/3070/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2806/en-US