Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 83
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY 30254/18 ANDRESEN K.S.S. NOR 3/24/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0324JUD003025418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216348
CASE OF AĞTAŞ v. TURKEY
CASE OF A TA v. TURKEY 33240/96 KILIC O. TUR 2/2/2006 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 3 and 8 and of P1 1 No violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 13 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0202JUD003324096https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-72238
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9214/80 9473/81 9474/81 N/A GBR 5/28/1985 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 8 Violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0528JUD000921480https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57416
CASE OF ARTUN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF ARTUN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 33239/96 KILIC O. TUR 2/2/2006 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 3 and 8 and of P1 1 No violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 1 Violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0202JUD003323996https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-72236
CASE OF ŞAYLI v. TURKEY
CASE OF AYLI v. TURKEY 33243/96 KILIC O. KIRDOK M. Ali TUR 2/2/2006 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 3 and 8 and of P1 1 No violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0202JUD003324396https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-72239
CASE OF B.S. v. SPAIN
CASE OF B.S. v. SPAIN 47159/08 WAISMAN V. ESP 7/24/2012 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0724JUD004715908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-112459
CASE OF BAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF BAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 67667/09 44092/12 56717/12 BARTENEV D.G. RUS 6/20/2017 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Violation of Article 14 10 Prohibition of discrimination Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0620JUD006766709https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-174422
CASE OF BEARD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BEARD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24882/94 N/A GBR 1/18/2001 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 14 Caravan Sites Act 1968 Ss. 6 10 11 12 16 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 Ss. 77 78 451 426 429 425 203 268 376 358 238 310 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0118JUD002488294https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59155
CASE OF BERDZENISHVILI AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF BERDZENISHVILI AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 14594/07 14597/07 14976/07 14978/07 15221/07 16369/07 16706/07 LEGASHVILI N. ABAZADZE T. JOMARJIDZE N. SHUBASHVILI K. DEKANOSIDZE T. LEACH P. LEVINE K. GAVRON J. GRIGORYAN V. EVANS J. RUS 12/20/2016 12:00:00 AM ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1220JUD001459407https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-169648
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK 38590/10 PETERSEN S. DNK 5/24/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524JUD003859010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163115
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK 38590/10 PETERSEN S. DNK 3/25/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life No violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325JUD003859010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-141941
CASE OF BOTTA v. ITALY
CASE OF BOTTA v. ITALY 21439/93 N/A ITA 2/24/1998 12:00:00 AM Art. 8 inapplicable Art. 14 inapplicable Law no. 13 of 9 January 1989 sections 1 2 10 and 11 Law no. 104 of 5 February 1992 sections 23 3 41 8 and 42 451 429 343 100 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0224JUD002143993https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58140
CASE OF BOUAMAR v. BELGIUM
CASE OF BOUAMAR v. BELGIUM 9106/80 N/A BEL 2/29/1988 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 1 Violation of Art. 5 4 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 No violation of Art. 14 5 4 Just satisfaction reserved Children s and Young Persons Welfare Act of 8 April 1965 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0229JUD000910680https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57445
CASE OF BUCKLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BUCKLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 20348/92 N/A GBR 9/25/1996 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 14 8 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 sections 77 78 and 80 Circular 28 77 Department of the Environment of 25 March 1977 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0925JUD002034892https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58076
CASE OF BURGHARTZ v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF BURGHARTZ v. SWITZERLAND 16213/90 N/A CHE 2/22/1994 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected victim Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 14 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Costs and expenses partial award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0222JUD001621390https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57865
CASE OF C. v. BELGIUM
CASE OF C. v. BELGIUM 21794/93 N/A BEL 8/7/1996 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 14 8 Constitution Article 6 Act of 15 December 1980 on the entry residence settlement and expulsion of aliens sections 20 21 62 and 69 Minister of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0807JUD002179493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57992
CASE OF CANEA CATHOLIC CHURCH v. GREECE
CASE OF CANEA CATHOLIC CHURCH v. GREECE 25528/94 GRC 12/16/1997 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 14 Not necessary to examine Art. 9 Not necessary to examine P1 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Pecuniary damage financial award Costs ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1216JUD002552894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58124
CASE OF CASTELLS v. SPAIN
CASE OF CASTELLS v. SPAIN 11798/85 N/A ESP 4/23/1992 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 10 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 10 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0423JUD001179885https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57772
CASE OF CHASSAGNOU AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
CASE OF CHASSAGNOU AND OTHERS v. FRANCE 25088/94 28331/95 28443/95 N/A FRA 4/29/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 1 Violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Violation of Art. 11 Violation of Art. 14 11 Not necessary to examine Art. 9 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0429JUD002508894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58288
CASE OF COSTER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF COSTER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24876/94 GBR 1/18/2001 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 No violation of P1 1 No violation of P1 2 No violation of Art. 14 Caravan Sites Act 1968 Ss. 6 10 11 12 16 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 Ss. 77 78 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0118JUD002487694https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59156