Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 6381 - 6400 of 6715
Summary of Stakeholders’ submissions on Liberia Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/36/LBR/3 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 February 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty sixth session 4 15 May 2020 Summary of Stakeholders submissions on Liberia UPRA/HRC/WG.6/36/LBR/3https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/summary-stakeholders-submissions-liberia-report-office-united-nations
Supplementary report to the Italian Government on the visit to Italy carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 14 to 18 June 2010
Supplementary report to the Italian Government on the visit to Italy carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CPT from 14 to 18 June 2010 ITA a 2011 04 14 2013 11 19 CPT/Inf 2013 CPTCPT/Inf (2013) 30 [Part 2]https://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-ita-20100615-en
Susith Wasitha Ranawaka v. Australia
Susith Wasitha Ranawaka v. Australia CAT/C/68/D/855/2017 Communication number s : 855/2017 Author: Susith Wasitha Ranawaka represented by counsel Michaela Byers Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Australia Submission date 20 Nov JUTBCAT/C/68/D/855/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2699/en-US
T.I. v. Canada,Uzbekistan
T.I. v. Canada Uzbekistan CAT/C/45/D/333/2007 Communication number s : 333/2007 Author: T.I. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Canada Uzbekistan Submission date 15 Sep 2007 Date of decision 15 Nov 2010 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/45/D/333/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/62/en-US
T.K. v. Lithuania
T.K. v. Lithuania LTU 03/12/2018 00:00:00 17/12/2018 15:41:48 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and functioning of justice: Unfair trial on the grounds of the applicant s inability to examine key witnesses in particular his partner in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50985
T.L.N. v. Norway
T.L.N. v. Norway CCPR/C/111/D/1942/2010 Communication number s : 1942/2010 Author: T.L.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Norway Submission date 11 Dec 2009 Date of decision 16 Jul 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1942/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1847/en-US
T. M. v. Republic of Korea
T. M. v. Republic of Korea CAT/C/53/D/519/2012 Communication number s : 519/2012 Author: T. M. represented by counsel Jae Chang Oh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 24 Apr 2012 Date of decision 21 JUTBCAT/C/53/D/519/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2059/en-US
T.P.F. v. Peru
T.P.F. v. Peru CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 Communication number s : 022/2009 Author: T.P.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Peru Submission date 18 Jun 2009 Date of decision 17 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1704/en-US
T.S. v. Netherlands
T.S. v. Netherlands CAT/C/71/D/896/2018 Communication number s : 896/2018 Author: T.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Nov 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/896/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3374/en-US
T.S. v. Russian Federation
T.S. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014 Communication number s : 69/2014 Author: T.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 66 Country Russian Federation Submission date 07 May 2014 Date of decision 28 Feb 2017 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3448/en-US
T.V. and A.G. v. Uzbekistan
T.V. and A.G. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/116/D/2044/2011 Communication number s : 2044/2011 Author: T.V. and A.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 16 Feb 2009 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2044/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2101/en-US
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CERD/C/TJK/CO/12 13 NULL 2023 05 25T00:00:00 CERD United Nations CERD/C/TJK/CO/12 13 International Convention on Distr.: General 24 May 2023 the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination Original: English UHRICERD/C/TJK/CO/12-13https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/1eb2ced4-b2a6-46c9-9351-11b04d4f6a78
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/TJK/CO/4 NULL 2022 11 10T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/TJK/CO/4 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 10 November 2022 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/TJK/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/c3956e93-c025-4ec1-aa62-7bfe84e32ef3
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/TJK/CO/3 NULL 2019 08 22T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/TJK/CO/3 International Covenant on Distr.: General 22 August 2019 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/TJK/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/722f6192-8f4b-40f4-887f-806ca882cedd
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/TJK/CO/3 NULL 2018 06 14T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/TJK/CO/3 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 18 June 2018 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/TJK/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b95b8546-f518-4d51-bbbc-773d902e4c7e
TAKUSH v. Greece
TAKUSH v. Greece GRC 17/04/2012 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Expulsion/extradition and procedural safeguards: Decision to expel a lawful resident of Thessaloniki without thorough review and without opportunity to submit reasons against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22532
TARABURCA v. the Republic of Moldova
TARABURCA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 06/03/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / action of security forces and lack of an effective remedy: Ill treatment of and injuries caused to the applicants in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6970
TARANEKS v. Latvia
TARANEKS v. Latvia LVA 02/03/2015 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice protection of private life: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the domestic court s failure to properly address the incitement EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12660
TAXQUET v. Belgium
TAXQUET v. Belgium BEL 16/11/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a fair trial due to the insufficient safeguards enabling the applicant to understand the reasons why he had been found EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1485
TERNA v. Italy
TERNA v. Italy ITA 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57509