Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 61 - 80 of 10871
A.Sh. et al. v. Switzerland
A.Sh. et al. v. Switzerland CAT/C/63/D/717/2015 Communication number s : 717/2015 Author: A.Sh. et al. represented by counsel Angela Stettler Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Switzerland Submission date 25 Nov 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/63/D/717/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2730/en-US
A.W.K. v. New Zealand
A.W.K. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010 Communication number s : 1998/2010 Author: A.W.K. represented by counsel Frank Deliu Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 112 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Aug 2010 Date of decision 28 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1896/en-US
A.Y.O.AQ v. Italy
A.Y.O.AQ v. Italy CCPR/C/134/D/3587/2019 Communication number s : 3587/2019 Author: A.Y.O.AQ Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Italy Submission date 02 May 2018 Date of decision 25 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/3587/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3145/en-US
A and B v. Azerbaijan
A and B v. Azerbaijan CAT/C/74/D/905/2018 Communication number s : 905/2018 Author: A and B Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 22 Dec 2018 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/74/D/905/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3586/en-US
Aïcha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria
A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria CCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011 Communication number s : 2086/2011 Author: A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache represented by Philippe Grant of Track Impunity Always TRIAL a Swiss association against impunity Type of decision: JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1911/en-US
Açikkollu v. Türkiye
A ikkollu v. T rkiye CCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020 Communication number s : 3730/2020 Author: M m ne A ikkollu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country T rkiye Submission date 29 Jan 2020 Date of decision 25 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3761/en-US
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CAT/C/67/D/854/2017 Communication number s : 854/2017 Author: A represented by counsel Philip Grant of TRIAL International Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 01 Nov JUTBCAT/C/67/D/854/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2623/en-US
A. v. Canada
A. v. Canada CAT/C/57/D/583/2014 Communication number s : 583/2014 Author: A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Canada Submission date 16 Dec 2014 Date of decision 09 May 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/57/D/583/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2115/en-US
A. v. Denmark
A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013 Communication number s : 53/2013 Author: A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Apr 2013 Date of decision 19 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3027/en-US
A v. New Zealand
A v. New Zealand CCPR/C/66/D/754/1997 Communication number s : 754/1997 Author: A Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country New Zealand Submission date 19 Apr 1996 Date of decision 15 Jul 1999 Comment: Individual opinion submitted by JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/754/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/802/en-US
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: CZECH REPUBLIC
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: CZECH REPUBLIC CEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6 NULL 2016 03 10T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 14 March 2016 against Women Original: English UHRICEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/df44459f-375a-4034-b0d5-fafc9b172d4d
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: SWEDEN
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: SWEDEN CEDAW/C/SWE/CO/8 9 NULL 2016 03 10T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/SWE/CO/8 9 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 10 March 2016 against Women Original: English UHRICEDAW/C/SWE/CO/8-9https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b1983f51-e09a-4ee8-b8bc-0445222180f2
AFET SUREYYA EREN v. Turkey
AFET SUREYYA EREN v. Turkey TUR 14/03/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:22:11 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment / actions of security forces: Ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36701
AFGHANISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AFGHANISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/AFG/CO/2 NULL 2017 06 12T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/AFG/CO/2 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 12 June 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/AFG/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f8a1c4a3-5be3-4e9a-b9fc-86481147aa50
AIT MOUHOUB v. France
AIT MOUHOUB v. France FRA 28/10/1998 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court in proceedings concerning the applicant s criminal complaint and civil party application for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32961
AKAR v. Turkey
AKAR v. Turkey TUR 21/09/2011 00:00:00 09/11/2016 15:26:10 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Unjustified interference of prison authorities with the applicants correspondence in general due to the lacking clarity of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35071
AKGUN v. Turkey
AKGUN v. Turkey TUR 22/11/2021 00:00:00 10/12/2021 10:51:13 Case Description: The case concerns the pre trial detention of the applicant in the absence of reasonable suspicion after the attempted coup in July 2016. The applicant was arrested on 17 October EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59081
AKVARDAR v. Turkey
AKVARDAR v. Turkey TUR 24/02/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:03 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s inability to obtain the compensation due for expropriation of land which had belonged to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54933
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624