Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 361 - 380 of 16278
Boutarsa v. Algeria
Boutarsa v. Algeria CCPR/C/135/D/3010/2017 Communication number s : 3010/2017 Author: Naima Boutarsa Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Algeria Submission date 26 May 2016 Date of decision 08 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3010/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3438/en-US
Bouzaout v. Algeria
Bouzaout v. Algeria CCPR/C/111/D/1974/2010 Communication number s : 1974/2010 Author: Sa d Bousseloub represented by Rachid Mesli Alkarama for Human Rights Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Algeria Submission date 30 Jul 2010 JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1974/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1851/en-US
Bouzenia v. Algeria
Bouzenia v. Algeria CCPR/C/111/D/1931/2010 Communication number s : 1931/2010 Author: Messaouda Bouzeriba represented by Alkarama for Human Rights Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Algeria Submission date 08 Jan 2010 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1931/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1843/en-US
Bozbey v. Turkmenistan
Bozbey v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/100/D/1530/2006 Communication number s : 1530/2006 Author: Omar Faruk Bozbey Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 27 Sep 2006 Date of decision 27 Oct 2010 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1530/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1590/en-US
Brada v. France
Brada v. France CAT/C/34/D/195/2002 Communication number s : 195/2002 Author: Mafhoud Brada Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country France Submission date 29 Nov 2001 Date of decision 17 May 2005 Comment: HR/CAT/PUB/1 p. 146 Substantive JUTBCAT/C/34/D/195/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/137/en-US
Brazil’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 2 May 2017 Brazil s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Friday 5 May 2017 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Brazil is one of the 14 States to UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2017/05/brazils-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
Brough v. Australia
Brough v. Australia CCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003 Communication number s : 1184/2003 Author: Corey Brough Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Australia Submission date 04 Mar 2003 Date of decision 17 Mar 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1241/en-US
Busyo et al. v. Congo,Democratic Republic of the Congo
Busyo et al. v. Congo Democratic Republic of the Congo CCPR/C/78/D/933/2000 Communication number s : 933/2000 Author: Adrien Mundyo Busyo Thomas Osthudi Wongodi Ren Sibu Matubuka et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Congo JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/933/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1080/en-US
Butovenko v. Ukraine
Butovenko v. Ukraine CCPR/C/102/D/1412/2005 Communication number s : 1412/2005 Author: Aleksandr Butovenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Ukraine Submission date 28 Mar 2005 Date of decision 19 Jul 2011 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1412/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1207/en-US
C.L.D. v. France
C.L.D. v. France CCPR/C/43/D/439/1990 Communication number s : 439/1990 Author: C.L.D. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 43 Country France Submission date 26 Dec 1990 Date of decision 08 Nov 1991 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/43/D/439/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/448/en-US
C.L. and Z.L. v. Denmark
C.L. and Z.L. v. Denmark CCPR/C/122/D/2753/2016 Communication number s : 2753/2016 Author: C.L. and Z.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Mar 2016 Date of decision 26 Mar 2018 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2753/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2484/en-US
C.M. v. Switzerland
C.M. v. Switzerland CAT/C/44/D/355/2008 Communication number s : 355/2008 Author: C.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 44 Country Switzerland Submission date 28 Jul 2008 Date of decision 14 May 2010 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/44/D/355/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/67/en-US
C.N. AND V. v. France
C.N. AND V. v. France FRA 11/01/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:41:59 Case Description: Failure to protect against subjection to servitude: Failure by the State to comply with its positive obligation to put in place a legislative and administrative framework EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33343
C.N. v. Burundi
C.N. v. Burundi CAT/C/60/D/579/2013 Communication number s : 579/2013 Author: G.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Burundi Submission date 11 Dec 2013 Date of decision 01 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/579/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3016/en-US
C. N. v. Denmark
C. N. v. Denmark CAT/C/57/D/709/2015 Communication number s : 709/2015 Author: C. N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No Future sessions Country Denmark Submission date 28 Oct 2015 Date of decision 29 Apr 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/57/D/709/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2121/en-US
C.O.C. v. Spain
C.O.C. v. Spain CRC/C/86/D/63/2018 Communication number s : 063/2018 Author: C.O.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Spain Submission date 28 Nov 2018 Date of decision 29 Jan 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/86/D/63/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2948/en-US
C.R. v. France
C.R. v. France FRA 23/12/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings and absence of an effective remedy. Articles 6 1 and 13 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33147
C. T. and K. M. v. Sweden
C. T. and K. M. v. Sweden CAT/C/37/D/279/2005 Communication number s : 279/2005 Author: C.T. and K.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 37 Country Sweden Submission date 07 Sep 2005 Date of decision 17 Nov 2006 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/37/D/279/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/102/en-US
CÔTE D’IVOIRE: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
C TE D IVOIRE: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/CIV/CO/2 NULL 2019 07 12T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/CIV/CO/2 Convention on the Distr.: General 12 July 2019 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/CIV/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/d3e3fa58-3b23-4afd-9de3-0471d028e205