Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 9121 - 9140 of 9430
Toshev v. Tajikistan
Toshev v. Tajikistan CCPR/C/101/D/1499/2006 Communication number s : 1499/2006 Author: Temur Toshev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Tajikistan Submission date 11 Apr 2006 Date of decision 30 Mar 2011 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1499/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1624/en-US
Tsukanov v. Kazakhstan
Tsukanov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/131/D/2676/2015 Communication number s : 2676/2015 Author: Andrey Tucano Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 19 May 2015 Date of decision 18 Mar 2021 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2676/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3245/en-US
Tunisia’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 27 April 2017 Tunisia s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Tuesday 2 May 2017 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Tunisia is one of the 14 UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2017/05/tunisias-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review
Turkey’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
Turkish version GENEVA 23 January 2020 Turkey s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Tuesday 28 January 2020 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Turkey UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2020/01/turkeys-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review
Turkmenistan’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
Russian Turkmen GENEVA 2 May 2018 Turkmenistan s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Monday 7 May 2018 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Turkmenistan UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2018/05/turkmenistans-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review
Tuvalu’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 4 May 2018 Tuvalu s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Wednesday 9 May 2018 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Tuvalu is one of the 14 States UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2018/05/tuvalus-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review
Twelfth Activity Report (2018-2020)
Twelfth Activity Report 2018 2020 ACFC/DOC 2020 2 2020 05 26 2020 11 25 ACFC/DOC 2020 2 Restricted 26 May 2020 Twelfth activity report covering the period 1 June 2018 31 May 2020 Adopted on 26 May 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE FCNMACFC/DOC(2020)2https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=12th_Activity_Report_2018_2020
U.A. v. Canada
U.A. v. Canada CAT/C/63/D/767/2016 Communication number s : 767/2016 Author: U.A. represented by counsel Rajwinder S. Bhambi Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 63 Country Canada Submission date 16 Aug 2016 Date of decision 17 May 2018 JUTBCAT/C/63/D/767/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2744/en-US
U.M.H. v. Sweden
U.M.H. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2742/2016 Communication number s : 2742/2016 Author: U.M.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2742/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2845/en-US
U.S. v. Finland
U.S. v. Finland CAT/C/30/D/197/2002 Communication number s : 197/2002 Author: U.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 30 Country Finland Submission date 07 Jan 2002 Date of decision 01 May 2003 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/30/D/197/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/168/en-US
UJ v. Hungary
UJ v. Hungary HUN 19/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to a journalist s criminal conviction for defamation in respect of a newspaper article criticizing wine produced by a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10639
UKRAINE: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
UKRAINE: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/UKR/CO/6 NULL 2014 12 11T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/UKR/CO/6 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 12 December 2014 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/UKR/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/99e5e877-ac93-4dd1-988e-1f6c813c6a15
UKRAINIAN MEDIA GROUP v. Ukraine
UKRAINIAN MEDIA GROUP v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2005 00:00:00 07/11/2016 14:16:38 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the conviction of the applicant company for publishing articles criticising political candidates on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26156
UN Human Rights Recommendations to the Syrian Arab Republic: The Second Cycle of The Universal Periodic Review (2016)
The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights OHCHR for Syria is pleased to provide this compilation of human rights recommendations made to the Syrian Arab Republic in 2016 in the context of the second Universal Periodic Review UPR UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/compilations/un-human-rights-recommendations-syrian-arab-republic-second-cycle-universal
UNEL v. Turkey
UNEL v. Turkey TUR 27/08/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the failure of the trial court to examine the evidence video and voice recordings accusing the applicant of bribery and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37226
UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/GBR/CO/6 NULL 2019 06 07T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/GBR/CO/6 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 7 June 2019 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment UHRICAT/C/GBR/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ffbcc6f9-4dd7-407b-943c-9e4099010c56
UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW: COMOROS
UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW: COMOROS A/HRC/12/16 NULL 2009 06 04T00:00:00 UPR UNITED NATIONS A Distr. GENERAL General Assembly A/HRC/12/16 3 June 2009 Original: ENGLISH/FRENCH HUMAN RIGHTS UHRIA/HRC/12/16https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/fde547e9-156b-448f-9169-5713197072dd
UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW: NEW ZEALAND
UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW: NEW ZEALAND A/HRC/12/8 NULL 2009 06 04T00:00:00 UPR UNITED NATIONS A Distr. GENERAL General Assembly A/HRC/12/8 4 June 2009 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS UHRIA/HRC/12/8https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/fc4a0815-877f-433e-ba6d-a3452774baf8
UPR Netherlands
UPR Netherlands A/HRC/36/15 NULL 2017 07 18T00:00:00 UPR 131.1 Ratify the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families Uganda Algeria Bangladesh Egypt Ghana Sudan Guatemala Philippines 131.2 UHRIA/HRC/36/15https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/0d506ff6-e61f-4674-9875-c1dc77ed805c
URECHEAN AND PAVLICENCO v. the Republic of Moldova
URECHEAN AND PAVLICENCO v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 20/04/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right of access to court on account of the refusal by the domestic courts in 2005 and 2007 respectively to examine EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6844