Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 121 - 140 of 7698
BURKINA FASO: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BURKINA FASO: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CMW/C/BFA/CO/1 NULL 2013 10 07T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/BFA/CO/1 International Convention on the Distr.: General 8 October 2013 Protection of the Rights of English All Migrant Workers and Original: French UHRICMW/C/BFA/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/9d7d2df1-c493-4f47-a935-de8f9dcccd6b
BURUNDI: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BURUNDI: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/BDI/CO/2NEW NULL 2014 12 11T00:00:00 CAT Concluding observations on the second periodic report of Burundi 1.The Committee against Torture considered the second periodic report of Burundi CAT/C/BDI/2 at its 1262nd and UHRICAT/C/BDI/CO/2NEWhttps://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/38e36b2e-f609-40eb-856f-4d110ccf235b
Bahadur Maharjan v. Nepal
Bahadur Maharjan v. Nepal CCPR/C/105/D/1863/2009 Communication number s : 1863/2009 Author: Dev Bahadur Maharjan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Nepal Submission date 31 Dec 2008 Date of decision 19 Jul 2012 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1863/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1238/en-US
Banda Weerasinghe v. Sri Lanka
Banda Weerasinghe v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/91/D/1031/2001 Communication number s : 1031/2001 Author: Amaranada Banda Weerasinghe Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 91 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 18 Jan 2001 Date of decision 31 Oct 2007 JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1031/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1357/en-US
Bandajevsky v. Belarus
Bandajevsky v. Belarus CCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002 Communication number s : 1100/2002 Author: Yuri Bandajevsky Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Belarus Submission date 19 Apr 2002 Date of decision 28 Mar 2006 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1248/en-US
Baranovs v. Latvia
Baranovs v. Latvia CCPR/C/133/D/3021/2017 Communication number s : 3021/2017 Author: Ivans Baranovs Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Latvia Submission date 06 Sep 2017 Date of decision 18 Oct 2021 Comment: Individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3021/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3167/en-US
Baumgarten v. Germany
Baumgarten v. Germany CCPR/C/78/D/960/2000 Communication number s : 960/2000 Author: Klaus Dieter Baumgarten Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Germany Submission date 30 Sep 1998 Date of decision 31 Jul 2003 Comment: The Covenant JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/960/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1061/en-US
Ben Ali v. Tunisia
Ben Ali v. Tunisia CCPR/C/115/D/2130/2012 Communication number s : 2130/2012 Author: Zine El Abidine Ben Ali Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 115 Country Tunisia Submission date 19 Jan 2012 Date of decision 02 Nov 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2130/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2083/en-US
Bholi Pharaka v. Nepal
Bholi Pharaka v. Nepal CCPR/C/126/D/2773/2016 Communication number s : 2773/2016 Author: Bholi Pharaka Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Nepal Submission date 11 May 2016 Date of decision 15 Jul 2019 Comment: Joint opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2773/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2779/en-US
Blaga and Blaga v. Portugal,Romania
Blaga and Blaga v. Portugal Romania CCPR/C/86/D/1158/2003 Communication number s : 1158/2003 Author: Aurel Blaga and Lucia Blaga Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Portugal Romania Submission date 16 Jul 2002 Date of decision 30 JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1158/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1242/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
Brychta v. Czech Republic
Brychta v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/97/D/1618/2007 Communication number s : 1618/2007 Author: Frantisek Brychta Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 97 Country Czech Republic Submission date 20 Sep 2006 Date of decision 27 Oct 2009 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/97/D/1618/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1547/en-US
Buckle v. New Zealand
Buckle v. New Zealand CCPR/C/70/D/858/1999 Communication number s : 858/1999 Author: Margaret Buckle Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 70 Country New Zealand Submission date 21 Sep 1998 Date of decision 25 Oct 2000 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/70/D/858/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/905/en-US
Burgess v. Australia
Burgess v. Australia CCPR/C/85/D/1012/2001 Communication number s : 1012/2001 Author: Brian John Lawrence Burgess Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 85 Country Australia Submission date 13 Jul 2001 Date of decision 21 Oct 2005 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1012/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1202/en-US
C.F. et al. v. Canada
C.F. et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/24/D/113/1981 Communication number s : 113/1981 Author: C.F. M.L and J. L.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 24 Country Canada Submission date 10 Dec 1981 Date of decision 12 Apr 1985 Comment: earlier JUTBCCPR/C/24/D/113/1981https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/366/en-US
Cáceres et al. v. Paraguay
C ceres et al. v. Paraguay CCPR/C/126/D/2751/2016 Communication number s : 2751/2016 Author: Norma Portillo C ceres on her own behalf and that of her deceased brother Rub n Portillo C ceres Hermenegilda C ceres Isabel Bord n Ram rez on her own behalf and JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2751/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2784/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
C v. Australia
C v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012 Communication number s : 2216/2012 Author: C Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2012 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2375/en-US
CABO VERDE: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
CABO VERDE: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CMW/C/CPV/CO/1 3 NULL 2022 06 01T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/CPV/CO/1 3 International Convention on the Distr.: General 2 June 2022 Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Original: English Members of UHRICMW/C/CPV/CO/1-3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f71f2e34-3d43-4420-81cf-983436826d94
CADE OF A.M.M. v. ITALY
CADE OF A.M.M. v. ITALY 34742/97 ITA 11/28/2002 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list friendly settlement 445 7 40 113 369 304 138 165 609 478 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1128JUD003474297 FIRST SECTION CASE OF A.M.M. v. ITALY Application no. 34742/97 JUDGMENT Friendly ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1128JUD003474297https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60795