Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 5281 - 5300 of 6320
Roitman Rosenmann v. Spain
Roitman Rosenmann v. Spain CAT/C/28/D/176/2000 Communication number s : 176/2000 Author: Marcos Roitman Rosenmann Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 28 Country Spain Submission date 25 Oct 2000 Date of decision 30 Apr 2002 Comment: An JUTBCAT/C/28/D/176/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/191/en-US
Rojas García et al. v. Colombia
Rojas Garc a et al. v. Colombia CCPR/C/71/D/687/1996 Communication number s : 687/1996 Author: Rafael Armando Rojas Garc a Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Colombia Submission date 30 Aug 1995 Date of decision 03 Apr 2001 JUTBCCPR/C/71/D/687/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/911/en-US
Romans v. Canada
Romans v. Canada CCPR/C/81/D/1040/2001 Communication number s : 1040/2001 Author: Steven Romans Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 81 Country Canada Submission date 13 Dec 2001 Date of decision 09 Jul 2004 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1040/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1113/en-US
S.A.O. v. Denmark
S.A.O. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/71/D/101/2016 Communication number s : 101/2016 Author: S.A.O. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 29 Oct 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/71/D/101/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2458/en-US
S.A.P. et consorts v. Switzerland
S.A.P. et consorts v. Switzerland CAT/C/56/D/565/2013 Communication number s : 565/2013 Author: S.A.P. et consorts repr sent s par un conseil Me Marcel Zirngast Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Switzerland Submission date 11 Nov JUTBCAT/C/56/D/565/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2078/en-US
S.A., and Z. v. Netherlands
S.A. and Z. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/126/D/2683/2015 Communication number s : 2683/2015 Author: S.A. on behalf of herself and her minor daughter Z Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Netherlands Submission date 04 Sep 2015 Date JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2683/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2783/en-US
S.B. v. Canada
S.B. v. Canada CAT/C/73/D/912/2019 Communication number s : 912/2019 Author: S.B. represented by Stewart Istvanffy and Anne Castagner Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Canada Submission date 10 Feb 2019 Date of decision 22 JUTBCAT/C/73/D/912/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3617/en-US
S.H. v. Finland
S.H. v. Finland CRC/C/81/D/6/2016 Communication number s : 006/2016 Author: S.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 81 Country Finland Submission date 16 Jul 2016 Date of decision 15 May 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/81/D/6/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2524/en-US
S. J. D. v. Australia
S. J. D. v. Australia CAT/C/51/D/387/2009 Communication number s : 387/2009 Author: S. J. D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Australia Submission date 01 Jun 2009 Date of decision 14 Nov 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/51/D/387/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2099/en-US
S. N. A. W. et al. v. Switzerland
S. N. A. W. et al. v. Switzerland CAT/C/35/D/231/2003 Communication number s : 231/2003 Author: S.N.A.W. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 35 Country Switzerland Submission date 12 Jun 2003 Date of decision 24 Nov 2005 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/35/D/231/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/119/en-US
S.P. v. Russian Federation
S.P. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/118/D/2152/2012 Communication number s : 2152/2012 Author: S.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Russian Federation Submission date 24 Feb 2011 Date of decision 27 Oct 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2152/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2214/en-US
S.S. v. Canada
S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/62/D/715/2015 Communication number s : 715/2015 Author: S.S. represented by counsel Raj S. Bhambi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Canada Submission date 20 Nov 2015 Date of decision 28 Nov 2017 JUTBCAT/C/62/D/715/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2411/en-US
S.S. v. Canada
S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/59/D/581/2014 Communication number s : 581/2014 Author: S.S. represented by counsel Rajwinder Bhambi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 59 Country Canada Submission date 02 Jan 2014 Date of decision 30 Nov 2016 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/59/D/581/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2202/en-US
S.T. v. Russian Federation
S.T. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014 Communication number s : 065/2014 Author: S.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Russian Federation Submission date 08 Nov 2013 Date of decision 25 Jan 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2651/en-US
S.V. et al. v. Canada
S.V. et al. v. Canada CAT/C/26/D/49/1996 Communication number s : 049/1996 Author: S.V. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 26 Country Canada Submission date 15 May 1996 Date of decision 15 May 2001 Comment: exact date of admissibility JUTBCAT/C/26/D/49/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/200/en-US
S. V. v. Canada
S. V. v. Canada CCPR/C/105/D/1827/2008 Communication number s : 1827/2008 Author: S. V. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Canada Submission date 26 Sep 2008 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1827/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1536/en-US
SACALEANU v. Romania
SACALEANU v. Romania ROU 06/12/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 19 judgments in respect of 101 applications 1 relates to the long standing structural problem of non implementation or delayed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12744
SAVRAN v. Denmark
SAVRAN v. Denmark DNK 07/12/2021 00:00:00 10/12/2021 10:51:13 Case Description: The cases concern expulsion orders combined with permanent re entry bans following criminal convictions finally upheld during proceedings requesting revocation of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59071
SAYGILI AND BILGIC v. Turkey
SAYGILI AND BILGIC v. Turkey TUR 20/08/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the closure of a newspaper for a period of 30 days which was erroneously considered to be the successor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37244
SEGERSTEDT-WIBERG AND OTHERS v. Sweden
SEGERSTEDT WIBERG AND OTHERS v. Sweden SWE 06/09/2006 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Protection of private life freedom of expression and association and lack of domestic remedy: Unjustified storage by the Security Service of information EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2144