Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 161 - 180 of 24566
Aïcha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria
A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria CCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011 Communication number s : 2086/2011 Author: A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache represented by Philippe Grant of Track Impunity Always TRIAL a Swiss association against impunity Type of decision: JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1911/en-US
Aïcha Habouchi v. Algeria
A cha Habouchi v. Algeria CCPR/C/128/D/2819/2016 Communication number s : 2819/2016 Author: A cha Habouchi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Algeria Submission date 07 Apr 2016 Date of decision 27 Mar 2020 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2819/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2871/en-US
A decency threshold for prisons – criteria for assessing conditions of detention
A decency threshold for prisons criteria for assessing conditions of detention fcn fk fkm fkmh fkmv fkrg fmpm ftb 2021 05 06 2018 04 19 European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CPT CPT/Inf 2021 5 CPTCPT/Inf(2021)5-parthttps://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-standards-inf-2021-5-part-en
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002 Communication number s : 1079/2002 Author: A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 29 Apr 2002 Date of decision 19 Mar 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1545/en-US
Açikkollu v. Türkiye
A ikkollu v. T rkiye CCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020 Communication number s : 3730/2020 Author: M m ne A ikkollu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country T rkiye Submission date 29 Jan 2020 Date of decision 25 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3761/en-US
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CAT/C/67/D/854/2017 Communication number s : 854/2017 Author: A represented by counsel Philip Grant of TRIAL International Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 01 Nov JUTBCAT/C/67/D/854/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2623/en-US
A. v. Canada
A. v. Canada CAT/C/57/D/583/2014 Communication number s : 583/2014 Author: A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Canada Submission date 16 Dec 2014 Date of decision 09 May 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/57/D/583/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2115/en-US
A. v. Denmark
A. v. Denmark CCPR/C/116/D/2357/2014 Communication number s : 2357/2014 Author: A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 116 Country Denmark Submission date 17 Mar 2014 Date of decision 30 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2357/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2114/en-US
A. v. Denmark
A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013 Communication number s : 53/2013 Author: A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Apr 2013 Date of decision 19 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3027/en-US
A v. Netherlands
A v. Netherlands CAT/C/21/D/91/1997 Communication number s : 091/1997 Author: A Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 21 Country Netherlands Submission date 23 Oct 1997 Date of decision 13 Nov 1998 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/21/D/91/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/239/en-US
A v. New Zealand
A v. New Zealand CCPR/C/66/D/754/1997 Communication number s : 754/1997 Author: A Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country New Zealand Submission date 19 Apr 1996 Date of decision 15 Jul 1999 Comment: Individual opinion submitted by JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/754/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/802/en-US
A v. Russian Federation
A v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/81/D/137/2018 Communication number s : 137/2018 Author: A Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 81 Country Russian Federation Submission date 21 Sep 2018 Date of decision 23 Feb 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/81/D/137/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3051/en-US
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania LTU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 03/12/2018 15:46:42 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights on account of the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50865
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: CZECH REPUBLIC
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: CZECH REPUBLIC CEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6 NULL 2016 03 10T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 14 March 2016 against Women Original: English UHRICEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/df44459f-375a-4034-b0d5-fafc9b172d4d
ADRIAN CONSTANTIN v. Romania
ADRIAN CONSTANTIN v. Romania ROU 12/07/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings which ended with the applicant s conviction to a suspended prison sentence for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16525
AFGHANISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AFGHANISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/AFG/CO/2 NULL 2017 06 12T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/AFG/CO/2 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 12 June 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/AFG/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f8a1c4a3-5be3-4e9a-b9fc-86481147aa50
AGANIKYAN v. Armenia
AGANIKYAN v. Armenia ARM 05/04/2018 00:00:00 18/04/2018 09:59:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49313
AGGUL AND AL v. Turkey
AGGUL AND AL v. Turkey TUR 22/05/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment right to liberty and security protection of private and family life etc.: The applicants complained i.a. about their eviction from their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28713
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey TUR 18/03/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: These cases concern a violation of the applicants right to freedom of expression on account of domestic court orders blocking access to Google Sites and YouTube EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37256
AKTAS AND ASLANISKENDER v. Turkey
AKTAS AND ASLANISKENDER v. Turkey TUR 25/09/2019 00:00:00 30/10/2019 17:27:44 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to respect for private life on account of the authorities refusal in 2007 of the applicants request for changing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54133