Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 16 of 16
A.F. v. Canada
A.F. v. Canada CCPR/C/131/D/2838/2016 Communication number s : 2838/2016 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Canada Submission date 18 Oct 2016 Date of decision 17 Mar 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2838/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3247/en-US
Buckle v. New Zealand
Buckle v. New Zealand CCPR/C/70/D/858/1999 Communication number s : 858/1999 Author: Margaret Buckle Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 70 Country New Zealand Submission date 21 Sep 1998 Date of decision 25 Oct 2000 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/70/D/858/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/905/en-US
D.N. v. Canada
D.N. v. Canada CCPR/C/127/D/2276/2013 Communication number s : 2276/2013 Author: D.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 127 Country Canada Submission date 20 Jul 2013 Date of decision 24 Oct 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2276/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2800/en-US
F.B. et al. v. France
F.B. et al. v. France CRC/C/86/D/R.77/2019 Communication number s : 77/2019 Author: F.B. et al. Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 86 Country France Submission date 01 Mar 2019 Date of decision 04 Feb 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/86/D/R.77/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3575/en-US
Gorji-Dinka v. Cameroon
Gorji Dinka v. Cameroon CCPR/C/83/D/1134/2002 Communication number s : 1134/2002 Author: Fongum Gorji Dinka Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Cameroon Submission date 14 Mar 2002 Date of decision 17 Mar 2005 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/83/D/1134/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1174/en-US
Hashemi and Hashemi v. Netherlands
Hashemi and Hashemi v. Netherlands CCPR/C/125/D/2489/2014 Communication number s : 2489/2014 Author: Jamshed Hashemi and Maryam Hashemi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Netherlands Submission date 19 Jul 2013 Date of decision 26 JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2489/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3321/en-US
J.S.H.R. v. Spain
J.S.H.R. v. Spain CRC/C/81/D/13/2017 Communication number s : 013/2017 Author: J.S.H.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 81 Country Spain Submission date 20 Sep 2016 Date of decision 15 May 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/81/D/13/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2525/en-US
Madafferi v. Australia
Madafferi v. Australia CCPR/C/81/D/1011/2001 Communication number s : 1011/2001 Author: Francesco Madafferi and Anna Maria Immacolata Madafferi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Australia Submission date 16 Jul 2001 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1011/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1123/en-US
N.K. v. Netherlands
N.K. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/120/D/2326/2013/REV.1 Communication number s : 2326/2013 Author: N.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Netherlands Submission date 10 Dec 2013 Date of decision 18 Jul 2017 Comment: Annex: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2326/2013/REV.1https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2317/en-US
O.V.J. v. Denmark
O.V.J. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/61/D/50/2013 Communication number s : 050/2013 Author: O.V.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 61 Country Denmark Submission date 24 Dec 2012 Date of decision 23 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/50/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2054/en-US
Pillai et al. v. Canada
Pillai et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008 Communication number s : 1763/2008 Author: Ernest Sigman Pillai and Laeticia Swenthi Joachimpillai Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Canada Submission date 29 Feb 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1631/en-US
R.H.M. v. Denmark
R.H.M. v. Denmark CRC/C/86/D/83/2019 Communication number s : 83/2019 Author: R.H.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Denmark Submission date 26 Apr 2019 Date of decision 04 Feb 2021 Comment: Individual opinion of Committee JUTBCRC/C/86/D/83/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3565/en-US
Rajan and Rajan v. New Zealand
Rajan and Rajan v. New Zealand CCPR/C/78/D/820/1998 Communication number s : 820/1998 Author: Keshva Rajan and Sashi Kantra Rajan Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 78 Country New Zealand Submission date 11 Jul 1997 Date of decision 06 JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/820/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1053/en-US
Salgado v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Salgado v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/37/D/11/2006 Communication number s : 011/2006 Author: Constance Ragan Salgado Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 37 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and JUTBCEDAW/C/37/D/11/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1713/en-US
Winata and Li v. Australia
Winata and Li v. Australia CCPR/C/72/D/930/2000 Communication number s : 930/2000 Author: Hendrick Winata and So Lan Li Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Australia Submission date 11 May 2000 Date of decision 26 Jul 2001 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/72/D/930/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/929/en-US
Youcif Almegaryaf and Hisham Matar (represented by TRIAL (Track Impunity Always)) v. Libya
Youcif Almegaryaf and Hisham Matar represented by TRIAL Track Impunity Always v. Libya CCPR/C/110/D/2006/2010 Communication number s : 2006/2010 Author: Youcif Almegaryaf and Hisham Matar represented by TRIAL Track Impunity Always Type of decision: JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2006/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1815/en-US