Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 162
11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 12 February 2002 in accordance UNIV-11-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment New York 10 December 1984 Entry into force : 26 June 1987 in accordance with article 27 1 . 1 UNIV-9https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-9&chapter=4&clang=_en
A/HRC/46/5: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Belarus
United Nations A/HRC/46/5 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 January 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty sixth session 22 February 19 March 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic UPRA/HRC/46/5https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc465-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-belarus
A/HRC/47/13: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Myanmar
United Nations A/HRC/47/13 General Assembly Distr.: General 12 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/13https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4713-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-myanmar
A/HRC/47/5: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Lebanon
United Nations A/HRC/47/5 General Assembly Distr.: General 7 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/5https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc475-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-lebanon
A/HRC/47/6: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Mauritania
United Nations A/HRC/47/6 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 April 2021 English Original: English/French Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal UPRA/HRC/47/6https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc476-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-mauritania
A/HRC/47/8: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Australia
United Nations A/HRC/47/8 General Assembly Distr.: General 24 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/8https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc478-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-australia
A.W.K. v. New Zealand
A.W.K. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010 Communication number s : 1998/2010 Author: A.W.K. represented by counsel Frank Deliu Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 112 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Aug 2010 Date of decision 28 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1896/en-US
Aden et al. v. Denmark
Aden et al. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015 Communication number s : 2531/2015 Author: Nimo Mohamed Aden and Liban Muhammed Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Sep 2014 Date of decision 25 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2791/en-US
CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVI v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2312/08 34179/08 LOZO A. MEHIC I. BIH 7/18/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 7 No punishment without law Article 7 1 Heavier penalty Retroactivity Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD000231208https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122716
Dafnis v. Greece
Dafnis v. Greece CCPR/C/135/D/3740/2020 Communication number s : 3740/2020 Author: Andreas Dafnis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Greece Submission date 20 Apr 2020 Date of decision 19 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3740/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3678/en-US
Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Outcomes of Australia, Saint Lucia, and Nepal
8 July 2021 The Human Rights Council in a midday meeting adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Australia Saint Lucia and Nepal. Speaking on the Universal Periodic Review outcome of Australia were Malawi Marshall Islands Morocco Namibia Nepal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2021/07/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-australia
Human Rights Council adopts Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Sweden, Grenada, Turkey and Kiribati
29 September 2020 Begins General Debate on Human Rights Bodies and Mechanisms The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Sweden Grenada Turkey and Kiribati. It also started the general debate on human rights UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/general-comments-and-recommendations/2020/09/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on Nauru, Rwanda and Nepal
Human Rights Council MORNING 7 June 2011 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on Nauru Rwanda and Nepal. Marlene Moses Permanent Representative of Nauru to the United Nations in New York said the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-nauru-rwanda
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review on Micronesia and Mauritania
Human Rights Council MORNING 18 March 2011 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Micronesia and Mauritania. Jeem Lippwe Deputy Permanent Representative of the Federated States of Micronesia to the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-micronesia
Human Rights Council holds Annual thematic discussion on sharing best practices and promoting technical cooperation
Human Rights Council MIDDAY 21 March 2012 Discussion Focuses on Paving the Way towards the Second Cycle of the Universal Periodic Review The Human Rights Council during its midday meeting today held its annual thematic discussion on sharing of best UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/03/human-rights-council-holds-annual-thematic-discussion-sharing-best-practices
Human Rights Council holds general debate on Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights CouncilMIDDAY 15 March 2019 The Human Rights Council during a midday meeting held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review. In the discussion speakers said that the Universal Periodic Review was one of the great successes of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-holds-general-debate-universal-periodic-review
Manuel v. New Zealand
Manuel v. New Zealand CCPR/C/91/D/1385/2005 Communication number s : 1385/2005 Author: Benjamin Manuel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country New Zealand Submission date 06 Apr 2005 Date of decision 18 Oct 2007 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1385/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1379/en-US
Pillai et al. v. Canada
Pillai et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008 Communication number s : 1763/2008 Author: Ernest Sigman Pillai and Laeticia Swenthi Joachimpillai Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Canada Submission date 29 Feb 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1631/en-US