Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1281 - 1300 of 1300
Working Group on discrimination against women and girls
Report to HRC A/HRC/29/40/Add.2 from 11 September 2014 to 19 September 2014 26 June 2015 Working Group on discrimination against women and girls Peru United Nations A/HRC/29/40/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General 26 June 2015 English Original: Spanish UNSPA/HRC/29/40/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f29%2f40%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on discrimination against women and girls
Report to HRC A/HRC/35/29/Add.2 from 6 December 2016 to 15 December 2016 24 May 2017 Working Group on discrimination against women and girls Kuwait United Nations A/HRC/35/29/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General 24 May 2017 Original: English Human UNSPA/HRC/35/29/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f35%2f29%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on discrimination against women and girls
Report to HRC A/HRC/23/50/Add.2 from 7 January 2013 to 11 January 2013 30 May 2013 Working Group on discrimination against women and girls Tunisia United Nations A/HRC/23/50/Add.2 Distr.: General General Assembly 30 May 2013 Original: English Human Rights UNSPA/HRC/23/50/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f23%2f50%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
X v. Spain
X v. Spain CCPR/C/93/D/1456/2006 Communication number s : 1456/2006 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Spain Submission date 14 Feb 2006 Date of decision 24 Jul 2008 Comment: The texts of two individual opinions one JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1456/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1448/en-US
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 17/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the transgender applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the absence of quick transparent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52421
XENIDES-ARESTIS v. Turkey
XENIDES ARESTIS v. Turkey TUR 22/03/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: These cases concern the continuous denial of access to property in the northern part of Cyprus and the consequent loss of control thereof Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37308
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569
Y.U. v. Russia
Y.U. v. Russia RUS 13/02/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to respect for her family life Article 8 on account of the non enforcement of the judgment taken by the Moscow courts in 2008 2009 ordering EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14038
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine UKR 25/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31204
Yelitze Lisbeth Moreno de Castillo v. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Yelitze Lisbeth Moreno de Castillo v. Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of CCPR/C/121/D/2610/2015 Communication number s : 2610/2015 Author: Yelitze Lisbeth Moreno de Castillo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Venezuela Bolivarian JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2610/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2478/en-US
Yevdokimov and Rezanov v. Russian Federation
Yevdokimov and Rezanov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/101/D/1410/2005 Communication number s : 1410/2005 Author: Denis Yevdokimov and Artiom Rezanov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 Mar 2004 JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1410/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1609/en-US
Young-kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea
Young kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012 Communication number s : 2179/2012 Author: Young kwan Kim et al. represented by counsel Du Jin Oh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Republic of Korea Submission JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1939/en-US
Yuldashev v. Kyrgyzstan
Yuldashev v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/130/D/2405/2014 Communication number s : 2405/2014 Author: Sharobodin Yuldashev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 20 Apr 2012 Date of decision 29 Oct 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2405/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3284/en-US
Z.S. v. Georgia
Z.S. v. Georgia CAT/C/70/D/915/2019 Communication number s : 915/2019 Author: Z.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 Country Georgia Submission date 03 Jan 2019 Date of decision 30 Dec 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/70/D/915/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3421/en-US
ZARA ISAYEVA v. Russia
ZARA ISAYEVA v. Russia RUS 06/07/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14078
ZELENCHUK AND TSYTSYURA v. Ukraine
ZELENCHUK AND TSYTSYURA v. Ukraine UKR 22/08/2018 00:00:00 05/09/2018 11:48:13 Case Description: The cases 1 of this group concern the long lasting moratorium on the alienation of agricultural land found by the Court to be in violation of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50173
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2017 10 18 2017 10 20 I. INTRODUCTION The Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the GRECOGrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIC
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2015 06 19 2015 07 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Luxembourg authorities GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIC
Äärelä and Näkkäläjärvi v. Finland
rel and N kk l j rvi v. Finland CCPR/C/73/D/779/1997 Communication number s : 779/1997 Author: Anni rel and Jouni N kk l j rvi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Finland Submission date 04 Nov 1997 Date of decision 24 Oct 2001 JUTBCCPR/C/73/D/779/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/939/en-US
v. Switzerland
v. Switzerland CAT/C/52/D/481/2011 Communication number s : 481/2011 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Switzerland Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/52/D/481/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1836/en-US