Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3081 - 3100 of 4001
S.C. RAISA M. SHIPPING. S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. RAISA M. SHIPPING. S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 08/07/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court due to the lack of sufficient diligence of the competent court to ensure that EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13425
S.C. TEXTINC S.A. v. Romania
S.C. TEXTINC S.A. v. Romania ROU 06/02/2018 00:00:00 13/02/2018 17:06:02 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the principle of legal certainty due to the quashing of a final domestic decision in favour of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48855
S.C. UZINEXPORT S.A. v. Romania
S.C. UZINEXPORT S.A. v. Romania ROU 30/06/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Dismissal by the High Court of Cassation and Justice of a claim by a company seeking to obtain default interest EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17582
S.E.M.A. v. France
S.E.M.A. v. France CRC/C/92/D/130/2020 Communication number s : 130/2020 Author: S.E.M.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 92 Country France Submission date 09 Dec 2020 Date of decision 25 Jan 2023 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/92/D/130/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3747/en-US
S.F.A. v. Denmark
S.F.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/85/2015 Communication number s : 085/2015 Author: S.F.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/85/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2427/en-US
S.F.A. v. Denmark
S.F.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/85/2015 Communication number s : 085/2015 Author: S.F.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date 22 Apr 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/85/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2637/en-US
S.F. AND OTHERS v. Sweden
S.F. AND OTHERS v. Sweden SWE 15/08/2012 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Risk of ill treatment in case of deportation to Iran. Status of Execution: The applicant was granted permanent residence. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2196
S.F. v. Switzerland
S.F. v. Switzerland CHE 30/09/2020 00:00:00 15/10/2020 16:39:02 Case Description: Right to life: Failure of police to prevent a suicide committed in an unusual way by a vulnerable detainee left unguarded in a police cell for forty minutes without paying EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56081
S.G. v. Netherlands
S.G. v. Netherlands CAT/C/32/D/135/1999 Communication number s : 135/1999 Author: S.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Netherlands Submission date 19 Jul 1999 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: Under rule 108 9 the State JUTBCAT/C/32/D/135/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/151/en-US
S. H. v. Finland
S. H. v. Finland FIN 29/10/2008 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of medical insurance proceedings due to the inability for the applicant to comment on two medical opinions included EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4990
S.I. v. Slovenia
S.I. v. Slovenia SVN 13/01/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference as a result of the excessive length of proceedings concerning custody and visiting rights relating to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7142
S.L. AND J.L. v. Croatia
S.L. AND J.L. v. Croatia HRV 19/10/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Failure of the state to protect the property rights of minors under a real estate swap agreement on the grounds that the Social Welfare Centre EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10305
S.M.M. v. the United Kingdom
S.M.M. v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to ensure the effectiveness of available procedural safeguards and to act with appropriate due diligence in managing and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48329
S.M. and S.V. v. Denmark
S.M. and S.V. v. Denmark CCPR/C/130/D/2752/2016 Communication number s : 2752/2016 Author: S.M. and S.V. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Mar 2016 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2752/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3265/en-US
S.M. v. Croatia
S.M. v. Croatia HRV 25/06/2020 00:00:00 23/07/2020 11:27:33 Case Description: Prohibition of forced labour: Lack of an effective investigation into the applicant s allegations of human trafficking and/or forced prostitution. Article 4 procedural limb EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55651
S.N., E.R. v. North Macedonia
S.N. E.R. v. North Macedonia CEDAW/C/75/D/107/2016 Communication number s : 107/2016 Author: S.N. E.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country North Macedonia Submission date Date of decision 24 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/107/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2703/en-US
S.R. v. Canada
S.R. v. Canada CAT/C/74/D/973/2019 Communication number s : 973/2019 Author: S.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Canada Submission date 29 Oct 2019 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/74/D/973/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3287/en-US
SÄRGAVA v. Estonia
S RGAVA v. Estonia EST 16/02/2022 00:00:00 03/03/2022 15:55:23 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of sufficient procedural safeguards to protect privileged data during the seizure and the subsequent examination of a lawyer s laptop and mobile EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59837
S.S. v. Australia
S.S. v. Australia CAT/C/60/D/648/2015 Communication number s : 648/2015 Author: S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Australia Submission date 14 Oct 2014 Date of decision 10 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/648/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3430/en-US
S.T.S. v. the Netherlands
S.T.S. v. the Netherlands NLD 07/09/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length and lack of efficiency of proceedings on the lawfulness of the minor s custodial placement in a confined EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4555