Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3301 - 3320 of 4001
STAVEBNA SPOLOCNOST TATRY POPRAD, S.R.O. v. Slovakia
STAVEBNA SPOLOCNOST TATRY POPRAD S.R.O. v. Slovakia SVK 03/08/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of right to court due to the rejection by the Constitutional Court of an appeal as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8205
STAVROPOULOS AND OTHERS v. Greece
STAVROPOULOS AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 25/09/2020 00:00:00 15/10/2020 16:39:02 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Unnecessary and unlawful interference with the right not to manifest one s belief due to the registry office s referring in the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56105
STEBNITSKIY AND KOMFORT v. Ukraine
STEBNITSKIY AND KOMFORT v. Ukraine UKR 03/05/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference due to a court decision concerning the applicant company s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31084
STEFANEC v. the Czech Republic
STEFANEC v. the Czech Republic CZE 18/10/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and freedom of expression: Denial of access to the Constitutional Court which limited its consideration to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6198
STEFANELLI v. San Marino
STEFANELLI v. San Marino SMR 08/05/2000 00:00:00 02/11/2016 17:41:24 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the lack of a public hearing at first instance and on appeal. Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11190
STEGARESCU AND BAHRIN v. Portugal
STEGARESCU AND BAHRIN v. Portugal PRT 04/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due to the lack of a remedy to challenge one s placement in security cells which had a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9695
STEININGER v. Austria
STEININGER v. Austria AUT 17/07/2012 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:17:47 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court due to the limited power of review of the Administrative Court as regards the applicant companies EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-537
STELIAN ROSCA v. Romania
STELIAN ROSCA v. Romania ROU 04/09/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Absence of a legal basis for an involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation in the context of incapacitation proceedings and inability to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13103
STEPHENS v. Malta (no. 1)
STEPHENS v. Malta no. 1 MLT 14/09/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:19 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Detention after unlawful arrest order made during the course of extradition proceedings and declared illegal. Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4093
STETTNER v. Poland
STETTNER v. Poland POL 24/06/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: excessive length of the examination of an appeal against the lawfulness of a decision to extend pre trial detention. Article 5 4 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17638
STIPIC AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
STIPIC AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 22/07/2021 00:00:00 06/08/2021 16:22:04 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Non enforcement of domestic judgments ordering the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina to pay work related benefits due to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58281
STOCKHOLMS FORSAKRINGS- OCH SKADESTANDSJURIDIK AB v. Sweden
STOCKHOLMS FORSAKRINGS OCH SKADESTANDSJURIDIK AB v. Sweden SWE 16/12/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant company s obligation to pay the costs arising from a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2116
STOICESCU (I) v. Romania
STOICESCU I v. Romania ROU 26/10/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Protection of private life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to comply with the obligation to protect the applicant s physical and psychological EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17498
STOIMENOV v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
STOIMENOV v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 05/07/2007 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:59:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the failure to respect the principle of equality of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5030
STOIMENOVIKJ AND MILOSHEVIKJ v. North Macedonia
STOIMENOVIKJ AND MILOSHEVIKJ v. North Macedonia MKD 25/06/2021 00:00:00 09/07/2021 15:53:26 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the lack of impartiality of the Supreme Court the composition of which in a civil case included EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58073
STOJAKOVIC v. Austria
STOJAKOVIC v. Austria AUT 09/02/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the lack of an oral hearing before the Appeals Commissions at the Ministry for Public Service and Sports and the Federal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-477
STOJANOVSKI AND OTHERS v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
STOJANOVSKI AND OTHERS v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 23/01/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful interference due to the dismissal of the applicants claims in restitution proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6548
STOLDER v. Italy
STOLDER v. Italy ITA 10/05/2010 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Arbitrary monitoring of correspondence under the special prison regime provided for by the Prisons Act. Article 8 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44683
STOLKOWSKI v. Poland
STOLKOWSKI v. Poland POL 21/03/2022 00:00:00 07/04/2022 12:15:01 Case Description: Excessive individual burden on applicant who did not receive compensation in 2015 after lengthy impoundment of his car in police car park between 2005 and 2010/2011 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60121
STOLLENWERK v. Germany
STOLLENWERK v. Germany DEU 07/12/2017 00:00:00 24/01/2018 09:34:38 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Infringement of the principle of equality of arms because the Court of Appeal took its decisions relating to the continuation of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48749