Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3841 - 3860 of 4001
WALASEK v. Poland
WALASEK v. Poland POL 18/10/2018 00:00:00 22/11/2018 10:36:08 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment conditions of detention: Detention for 28 days in an overcrowded cell. Article 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50831
WALCZAK v. Poland
WALCZAK v. Poland POL 09/07/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unnecessary interference due to the authorities refusal of family visits by the applicant s wife during detention. Article 8 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55603
WALDEMAR NOWAKOWSKI v. Poland
WALDEMAR NOWAKOWSKI v. Poland POL 17/12/2012 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with property rights: confiscation of the applicant s collection of antique weapons from the Second World War and earlier by domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-19921
WALLISHAUSER v. Austria
WALLISHAUSER v. Austria AUT 19/11/2012 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Domestic courts denied to acknowledge deemed service against a foreign State made in accordance with rules of customary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-551
WELLER v. Hungary
WELLER v. Hungary HUN 30/06/2009 00:00:00 03/11/2016 08:47:27 Case Description: Protection of privation and family life and discrimination: Refusal of maternity benefits because the mother of the children had not been eligible on account of her EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11342
WERNER v. Poland
WERNER v. Poland POL 15/11/2001 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of impartiality of a domestic court and unfairness of since the judge who had requested the applicant s dismissal from the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17759
WERZ v. Switzerland
WERZ v. Switzerland CHE 17/03/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings due to a judgment notification of the Supreme Court of the Canton of Berne 15 months EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4738
WESOLEK v. Poland
WESOLEK v. Poland POL 13/06/2019 00:00:00 27/06/2019 16:34:02 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court on account of the refusal of the applicant s request for full exemption from court fees to challenge EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52320
WETTSTEIN v. Switzerland
WETTSTEIN v. Switzerland CHE 21/03/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair trial due to the lack of impartiality of the cantonal administrative court as two part time judges had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4682
WIESER AND BICOS BETEILIGUNGEN GMBH v. Austria
WIESER AND BICOS BETEILIGUNGEN GMBH v. Austria AUT 16/01/2008 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of correspondence: Unlawful search and seizure of electronic data in a lawyer s owner and general manager of a limited liability EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1013
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria AUT 27/01/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the applicant company EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-967
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria AUT 13/03/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-979
WITEK v. Poland
WITEK v. Poland POL 11/04/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful placement in a psychiatric hospital on the basis of an expert opinion delayed ordering and examination by the district court of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-19105
WITKOWSKI v. Poland
WITKOWSKI v. Poland POL 13/03/2019 00:00:00 03/04/2019 16:35:04 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court due to the applicant s inability to appeal against a judgment given against him by the first EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51865
WITOLD LITWA v. Poland
WITOLD LITWA v. Poland POL 04/04/2000 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary detention in a sobering up centre. Article 5 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17757
WIZERKANIUK v. Poland
WIZERKANIUK v. Poland POL 05/10/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the criminal conviction of a chief editor and co owner of a local newspaper for the publication of an interview EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20600
WLOCH v. Poland (no. 2)
WLOCH v. Poland no. 2 POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Refusal of a domestic court to grant compensation under the relevant provisions for the applicant s unlawful detention on remand. Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39929
WODITSCHKA v. Austria
WODITSCHKA v. Austria AUT 21/01/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / discrimination on the ground of sex: Discriminatory treatment of a male homosexual sentenced to a fine or a suspended prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-985
WOJCIECHOWSKI v. Poland
WOJCIECHOWSKI v. Poland POL 05/06/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and efficient functioning of justice: Disregard of presumption of innocence due to the grounds used by courts to motivate decisions EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18649
WOJTAS-KALETA v. Poland
WOJTAS KALETA v. Poland POL 16/10/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Reprimand of a journalist by her employer Polish Public TV for having expressed in an interview and in an open letter her concerns about inter EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18347