Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3881 - 3900 of 4001
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.2 from 28 August 2006 to 1 September 2006 23 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Ecuador UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
X AND Y v. Croatia
X AND Y v. Croatia HRV 03/02/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Denial of a fair hearing due to lack of procedural safeguards in proceedings divesting the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10109
X, Y, A, B, C and D v. Greece
X Y A B C and D v. Greece CCPR/C/126/D/2701/2015 Communication number s : 2701/2015 Author: X Y A B C and D Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Greece Submission date 25 Sep 2015 Date of decision 26 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2701/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2899/en-US
X, Y and others v. Sweden
X Y and others v. Sweden CAT/C/67/D/816/2017 Communication number s : 816/2017 Author: X Y and others Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Sweden Submission date 23 Mar 2017 Date of decision 02 Aug 2019 Comment: Views non violation. JUTBCAT/C/67/D/816/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2624/en-US
X and Y v. Georgia
X and Y v. Georgia CEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009 Communication number s : 024/2009 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Georgia Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2051/en-US
X. v. Afghanistan,Sweden
X. v. Afghanistan Sweden CCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008 Communication number s : 1833/2008 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Afghanistan Sweden Submission date 26 Nov 2008 Date of decision 01 Nov 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1390/en-US
X v. Croatia
X v. Croatia HRV 01/12/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Exclusion of the applicants in the case of X the applicant was divested of her capacity to act while in the case of A.K. and L. the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10089
X. v. Denmark
X. v. Denmark CAT/C/53/D/458/2011 Communication number s : 458/2011 Author: X. represented by counsel Niels Erik Hansen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Denmark Submission date 10 May 2010 Date of decision 28 Nov 2014 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/53/D/458/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2039/en-US
X. v. Denmark,Ethiopia
X. v. Denmark Ethiopia CAT/C/53/D/458/2011 Communication number s : 458/2011 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Denmark Ethiopia Submission date 10 May 2010 Date of decision 28 Nov 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/53/D/458/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1945/en-US
X v. Hungary
X v. Hungary CCPR/C/125/D/2901/2016 Communication number s : 2901/2016 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country Hungary Submission date 08 Dec 2016 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2901/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3285/en-US
X v. Iceland
X v. Iceland CCPR/C/130/D/2818/2016 Communication number s : 2818/2016 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Iceland Submission date 24 Feb 2016 Date of decision 22 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual opinion of Jos Manuel Santos JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2818/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3289/en-US
X v. Latvia
X v. Latvia LVA 26/11/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:49 Case Description: Failure to satisfy the procedural requirements inherent in the right to respect for private life due to refusal by domestic courts to examine the conclusions of a psychological EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31110
X v. Poland
X v. Poland POL 28/02/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: Refusal to grant applicant full parental rights and custody over her youngest child in 2009 based solely or decisively on considerations regarding her sexual orientation violation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59871
X v. Slovenia
X v. Slovenia SVN 28/09/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Authorities failure to exercise the required diligence in the proceedings concerning the withdrawal of the applicant s parental rights which EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7220
X v. Sweden
X v. Sweden SWE 09/04/2018 00:00:00 02/05/2018 10:26:22 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / expulsion: Risk of ill treatment in case of the applicant s deportation ordered by the Migration Agency and confirmed by the Migration Court to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49349
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/900/2018 Communication number s : 900/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 Dec 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/900/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3362/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/59/D/686/2015 Communication number s : 686/2015 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Switzerland Submission date 02 Jun 2015 Date of decision 05 Dec 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/59/D/686/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2183/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/67/D/775/2016 Communication number s : 775/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Roman Schuler Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Switzerland Submission date 24 Oct 2016 Date of decision 05 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/775/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2625/en-US
X. v. Switzerland
X. v. Switzerland CAT/C/53/D/470/2011 Communication number s : 470/2011 Author: X. represented by counsel Monique Bremi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Switzerland Submission date 15 Jul 2011 Date of decision 24 Nov 2014 JUTBCAT/C/53/D/470/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2040/en-US
X v. Turkey
X v. Turkey TUR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Protection against discrimination / protection against ill treatment: Sustained discrimination and inhuman and degrading treatment on account of the homosexual applicant s detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37196