Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 121 - 140 of 7174
A and B v. Azerbaijan
A and B v. Azerbaijan CAT/C/74/D/905/2018 Communication number s : 905/2018 Author: A and B Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 22 Dec 2018 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/74/D/905/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3586/en-US
A and B v. Denmark v. Denmark
A and B v. Denmark v. Denmark CCPR/C/117/D/2291/2013 Communication number s : 2291/2013 Author: A and B Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Submission date 01 Oct 2013 Date of decision 13 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2291/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2128/en-US
A. and S.N. v. Norway
A. and S.N. v. Norway CCPR/C/33/D/224/1987 Communication number s : 224/1987 Author: A. and S.N. names deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 33 Country Norway Submission date 09 Mar 1987 Date of decision 11 Jul 1988 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/33/D/224/1987https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/528/en-US
Aïcha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria
A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria CCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011 Communication number s : 2086/2011 Author: A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache represented by Philippe Grant of Track Impunity Always TRIAL a Swiss association against impunity Type of decision: JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1911/en-US
Aïcha Habouchi v. Algeria
A cha Habouchi v. Algeria CCPR/C/128/D/2819/2016 Communication number s : 2819/2016 Author: A cha Habouchi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Algeria Submission date 07 Apr 2016 Date of decision 27 Mar 2020 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2819/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2871/en-US
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002 Communication number s : 1079/2002 Author: A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 29 Apr 2002 Date of decision 19 Mar 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1545/en-US
Açikkollu v. Türkiye
A ikkollu v. T rkiye CCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020 Communication number s : 3730/2020 Author: M m ne A ikkollu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country T rkiye Submission date 29 Jan 2020 Date of decision 25 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3761/en-US
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CAT/C/67/D/854/2017 Communication number s : 854/2017 Author: A represented by counsel Philip Grant of TRIAL International Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 01 Nov JUTBCAT/C/67/D/854/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2623/en-US
A. v. Denmark
A. v. Denmark CCPR/C/116/D/2357/2014 Communication number s : 2357/2014 Author: A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 116 Country Denmark Submission date 17 Mar 2014 Date of decision 30 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2357/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2114/en-US
A. v. Denmark
A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013 Communication number s : 53/2013 Author: A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Apr 2013 Date of decision 19 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3027/en-US
A v. Netherlands
A v. Netherlands CAT/C/21/D/91/1997 Communication number s : 091/1997 Author: A Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 21 Country Netherlands Submission date 23 Oct 1997 Date of decision 13 Nov 1998 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/21/D/91/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/239/en-US
A v. New Zealand
A v. New Zealand CCPR/C/66/D/754/1997 Communication number s : 754/1997 Author: A Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country New Zealand Submission date 19 Apr 1996 Date of decision 15 Jul 1999 Comment: Individual opinion submitted by JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/754/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/802/en-US
A v. Russian Federation
A v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/81/D/137/2018 Communication number s : 137/2018 Author: A Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 81 Country Russian Federation Submission date 21 Sep 2018 Date of decision 23 Feb 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/81/D/137/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3051/en-US
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: VANUATU
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: VANUATU CEDAW/C/VUT/CO/4 5 NULL 2016 03 09T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/VUT/CO/4 5 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 9 March 2016 against Women Original: English UHRICEDAW/C/VUT/CO/4-5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/2addb075-7489-4def-9bb7-0ee9f35f07c1
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
ALGERIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ALGERIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CMW/C/DZA/CO/2 NULL 2018 05 25T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/DZA/CO/2 International Convention on the Distr.: General 25 May 2018 Protection of the Rights of English All Migrant Workers and Original: French Members of UHRICMW/C/DZA/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/bdb784ca-7a7f-41ef-ab71-0d121b979f7f
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
AMARAL DE SOUSA v. Portugal
AMARAL DE SOUSA v. Portugal PRT 14/02/2002 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9469
ANAGNOSTOPOULOS v. Greece
ANAGNOSTOPOULOS v. Greece GRC 09/04/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfairness and excessive length of civil proceedings relating to pension rights. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22182
ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/ATG/CO/2 4 NULL 2017 06 30T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/ATG/CO/2 4 Convention on the Distr.: General 30 June 2017 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/ATG/CO/2-4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b7f7d059-2247-4707-86c7-6abae0fa8278