Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 281 - 300 of 12845
BABADAG v. Turkey
BABADAG v. Turkey TUR 12/01/2011 00:00:00 09/11/2016 16:14:15 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35626
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/BHR/CO/1 NULL 2018 11 15T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/BHR/CO/1 International Covenant on Distr.: General 15 November 2018 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/BHR/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ef2bcb58-bc2d-4a70-8a0f-59a393dcf797
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/BHR/CO/2 3 NULL 2017 05 29T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/BHR/CO/2 3 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 29 May 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/BHR/CO/2-3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/2b4b69f2-8805-4d8f-900f-73aa61bc578e
BAISUEV AND ANZOROV v. Georgia
BAISUEV AND ANZOROV v. Georgia GEO 18/03/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:13:47 Case Description: Unlawful and arbitrary detention of the applicants Russian citizens of Chechen origin by police officers and failure to inform them promptly of the reasons for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5900
BAJALDZIEV v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
BAJALDZIEV v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 25/01/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Denial of a fair trial: lack of objective impartiality in that the bench of the Supreme Court included a judge who had presided the Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6610
BAJIC v. North Macedonia
BAJIC v. North Macedonia MKD 10/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial due to the failure of the Supreme Court to communicate to the applicant the public prosecutor s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58423
BAKAN v. Turkey
BAKAN v. Turkey TUR 12/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusals by administrative courts to grant legal aid on the ground that actions were ill founded or that applicants failed to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37358
BAKOS v. Hungary
BAKOS v. Hungary HUN 07/01/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and lack of a remedy: Poor conditions of pre trial and post conviction detention resulting mainly from a structural problem of overcrowding and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10737
BALAKIN v. the Republic of Moldova
BALAKIN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 26/04/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lack of relevant and sufficient reasoning of detention orders lengthy examination of the lawfulness of detention on remand EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6950
BALASA v. Romania
BALASA v. Romania ROU 20/07/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Lack of a fair trial and partial non enforcement of a property title without compensation Status of Execution: Reopening of proceedings possible. As concerns the property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17510
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BALSAN v. the Czech Republic
BALSAN v. the Czech Republic CZE 18/10/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a fair trial because of the refusal to grant the applicant the right to question or have questioned the co EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6208
BALSYTE-LIDEIKIENE v. Lithuania
BALSYTE LIDEIKIENE v. Lithuania LTU 04/02/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due to the inability in administrative proceedings to question the experts on whose expert EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4213
BALTA AND DEMIR v. Turkey
BALTA AND DEMIR v. Turkey TUR 23/09/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Conviction on the basis of a statement by an anonymous witness whom neither the applicants nor the trial court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37356
BALTINS v. Latvia
BALTINS v. Latvia LVA 08/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:32:42 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Domestic courts failure to properly address the incitement plea in criminal proceedings raised by the applicant who claimed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31154
BANEL v. Lithuania
BANEL v. Lithuania LTU 18/09/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of effective investigation resulting in failure to establish the responsibility of the administrative authorities for the accidental death of a thirteen EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4363
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/BGD/CO/1 NULL 2017 04 27T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/BGD/CO/1 International Covenant on Distr.: General 27 April 2017 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/BGD/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/9a2678b7-7fac-43a9-a1f9-91fe5bdfa5fe
BANNIKOV v. Latvia
BANNIKOV v. Latvia LVA 11/09/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:49 Case Description: Excessive length of pre trial detention: lack of sufficient grounds to justify the applicant s continued detention. Status of Execution: On 1 October 2005 the provisions of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31106
BARANOWSKI PIOTR v. Poland
BARANOWSKI PIOTR v. Poland POL 02/01/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Belated examination of the applicant s appeal against the prolongation of his detention on remand. Article 5 4 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18931