Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 161 - 180 of 9244
Butovenko v. Ukraine
Butovenko v. Ukraine CCPR/C/102/D/1412/2005 Communication number s : 1412/2005 Author: Aleksandr Butovenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Ukraine Submission date 28 Mar 2005 Date of decision 19 Jul 2011 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1412/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1207/en-US
Bwalya v. Zambia
Bwalya v. Zambia CCPR/C/48/D/314/1988 Communication number s : 314/1988 Author: Peter Chiiko Bwalya Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 48 Country Zambia Submission date 30 Mar 1988 Date of decision 14 Jul 1993 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/48/D/314/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/377/en-US
Byahuranga v. Denmark
Byahuranga v. Denmark CCPR/C/82/D/1222/2003 Communication number s : 1222/2003 Author: Jonny Rubin Byahuranga Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Aug 2003 Date of decision 01 Nov 2004 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/1222/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1148/en-US
C.A. v. Italy
C.A. v. Italy CCPR/C/18/D/127/1982 Communication number s : 127/1982 Author: C.A. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 18 Country Italy Submission date 26 Jun 1982 Date of decision 31 Mar 1983 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/18/D/127/1982https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/479/en-US
C.C.N. v. Sweden
C.C.N. v. Sweden CCPR/C/136/D/3701/2020 Communication number s : 3701/2020 Author: C.C.N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Sweden Submission date 03 Jan 2020 Date of decision 24 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3701/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3680/en-US
C.F. et al. v. Canada
C.F. et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/24/D/113/1981 Communication number s : 113/1981 Author: C.F. M.L and J. L.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 24 Country Canada Submission date 10 Dec 1981 Date of decision 12 Apr 1985 Comment: earlier JUTBCCPR/C/24/D/113/1981https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/366/en-US
C.L.D. v. France
C.L.D. v. France CCPR/C/43/D/439/1990 Communication number s : 439/1990 Author: C.L.D. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 43 Country France Submission date 26 Dec 1990 Date of decision 08 Nov 1991 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/43/D/439/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/448/en-US
C.L.D. v. France
C.L.D. v. France CCPR/C/33/D/228/1987 Communication number s : 228/1987 Author: C.L.D. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 33 Country France Submission date 16 May 1987 Date of decision 18 Jul 1988 Comment: Two individual JUTBCCPR/C/33/D/228/1987https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/639/en-US
C.M. v. Switzerland
C.M. v. Switzerland CAT/C/44/D/355/2008 Communication number s : 355/2008 Author: C.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 44 Country Switzerland Submission date 28 Jul 2008 Date of decision 14 May 2010 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/44/D/355/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/67/en-US
C.M. v. Switzerland
C.M. v. Switzerland CHE 17/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:45:10 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure of the Social Insurance Tribunal to send to the applicant the observations of the opposing party concerning his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46747
C.N. v. Burundi
C.N. v. Burundi CAT/C/60/D/579/2013 Communication number s : 579/2013 Author: G.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Burundi Submission date 11 Dec 2013 Date of decision 01 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/579/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3016/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CADENE v. France
CADENE v. France FRA 08/06/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 12:02:12 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a tribunal to complain against fines for driving offences appeals declared inadmissible on the basis of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33403
CANADY v. Slovakia
CANADY v. Slovakia SVK 30/03/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to an independent and impartial tribunal following the imposition of a fine by the administrative authorities. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7911
CANADY v. Slovakia (no. 2)
CANADY v. Slovakia no. 2 SVK 20/01/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to an independent and impartial tribunal following the imposition of a fine by the administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8143
CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN
CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN 68519/10 LINDBERG C. O. SWE 4/3/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Iraq 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0403JUD006851910 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN Application ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0403JUD006851910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142085
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND 58802/12 MOTZ S. HASSAN T. CHE 1/7/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 13 3 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 3 Prohibition of torture Expulsion 350 620 444 110 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0107JUD005880212https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-139903
CASE OF A.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8000/08 THE AIRE CENTRE GBR 9/20/2011 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 8 in case of expulsion to Nigeria Sections 3 5 a and 5 of the Immigration Act 1971 Sections 82 1 82 2 j and k and 84 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920JUD000800008https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-106282
CASE OF A. AND B. v. MONTENEGRO
CASE OF A. AND B. v. MONTENEGRO 37571/05 RADULOVIC P. MNE 3/5/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Possessions ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0305JUD003757105https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-116972
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972