Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2501 - 2520 of 2819
Mr. S. G. et al. v. Switzerland
Mr. S. G. et al. v. Switzerland CAT/C/46/D/352/2008 Communication number s : 352/2008 Author: Mr. S. G. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Switzerland Submission date 15 Aug 2008 Date of decision 30 May 2011 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/46/D/352/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/59/en-US
Mustafa Onder v. Morocco
Mustafa Onder v. Morocco CAT/C/66/D/845/2017 Communication number s : 845/2017 Author: Mustafa Onder represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Morocco Submission date 17 Oct 2017 Date of decision 10 May 2019 JUTBCAT/C/66/D/845/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2589/en-US
N.M. v.
N.M. v. CEDAW/C/70/D/92/2015 Communication number s : 092/2015 Author: N.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 Country Submission date 04 Jun 2015 Date of decision 09 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/70/D/92/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2642/en-US
N.M. v. Türkiye
N.M. v. T rkiye CEDAW/C/70/D/92/2015 Communication number s : 092/2015 Author: N.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 Country T rkiye Submission date Date of decision 09 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/70/D/92/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2430/en-US
N.S. v. Switzerland,Türkiye
N.S. v. Switzerland T rkiye CAT/C/44/D/356/2008 Communication number s : 356/2008 Author: N.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 44 Country Switzerland T rkiye Submission date 19 Sep 2008 Date of decision 06 May 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCAT/C/44/D/356/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/66/en-US
NATIONAL TURKISH UNION AND KUNGYUN v. Bulgaria
NATIONAL TURKISH UNION AND KUNGYUN v. Bulgaria BGR 08/09/2017 00:00:00 20/09/2017 18:11:03 Case Description: Freedom of assembly: Unjustified refusal of courts to register the applicant association National Turkish Union promoting the rights of the Muslim EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47639
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey TUR 08/10/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37296
NUSRET KAYA AND OTHERS v. Turkey
NUSRET KAYA AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 08/09/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to restrictions imposed on the applicants telephone communications with their families EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37336
Nakrash and Qifen v. China,Sweden,Syrian Arab Republic
Nakrash and Qifen v. China Sweden Syrian Arab Republic CCPR/C/94/D/1540/2007 Communication number s : 1540/2007 Author: Mahmoud Walid Nakrash and Liu Qifen Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 94 Country China Sweden Syrian Arab Republic JUTBCCPR/C/94/D/1540/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1471/en-US
Netherlands: Council of Europe Anti-racism body concerned about xenophobic rhetoric in political discourse and integration of migrants
Netherlands: Council of Europe Anti racism body concerned about xenophobic rhetoric in political discourse and integration of migrants NLD 2019 06 04 Fifth report on the Netherlands en fr dut Press Release 04.06.2019 Press release in Dutch Netherlands: ECRINLD-PR-V-2019-288-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=NLD-PR-V-2019-288-ENG
ODABASI AND KOCAK v. Turkey
ODABASI AND KOCAK v. Turkey TUR 03/07/2006 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified and unnecessary interference due to criminal conviction for publishing a book allegedly defaming the memory of Atat rk. Article 10 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5536
OMER GUNER v. Turkey
OMER GUNER v. Turkey TUR 04/12/2018 00:00:00 17/12/2018 15:41:48 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial on account of the failure of the procedural safeguards in force at the time of the event to prevent the use of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50951
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
ORMANCI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
ORMANCI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 21/03/2005 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Lengthy judicial proceedings: excessive length of proceedings before administrative civil criminal labour land registry military and commercial and consumers courts EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5522
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey TUR 05/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: This group concerns violations of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly including the prosecution of participants and/or the use of excessive force to disperse peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37415
OZDIL AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
OZDIL AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: In the present case the Court found violations of Articles 5 1 and 8 of the Convention on account of the extra legal transfer of all five applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52803
OZGUR RADYO-SES RADYO TELEVIZYON YAYIN YAPIM VE TANITIM AS. v. Turkey
OZGUR RADYO SES RADYO TELEVIZYON YAYIN YAPIM VE TANITIM AS. v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the freedom of expression of the applicant broadcasting companies due to warnings and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37376
P.N. et al. v. Finland
P.N. et al. v. Finland CRC/C/91/D/100/2019 Communication number s : 100/2019 Author: P.N. K.K. and O.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Finland Submission date 30 Sep 2019 Date of decision 12 Sep 2022 Comment: Joint opinion of JUTBCRC/C/91/D/100/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3440/en-US
PASAOGLU v. Turkey
PASAOGLU v. Turkey TUR 08/10/2008 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Rejection of the applicant s request for renewal of his passport on account of a restriction note registered in his name by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5606