Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1161 - 1180 of 1536
PAKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
PAKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/PAK/CO/1 NULL 2017 06 01T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/PAK/CO/1 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 1 June 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/PAK/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/a78d3f49-640b-4514-9506-a6c817a55a2e
PAKSAS v. Lithuania
PAKSAS v. Lithuania LTU 06/01/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Electoral rights: Disproportionate restriction of the right to free elections due to the permanent and irreversible nature of the applicant s disqualification from standing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4324
PANASENKO v. Portugal
PANASENKO v. Portugal PRT 22/07/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the ineffectiveness of the court appointed defence counsel preventing the accused from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9645
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine (no. 2)
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine no. 2 UKR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: These cases 1 concern the systemic problem of the irreducibility of life sentences in Ukraine violations of Article 3 . Under Article 46 of the Convention in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52757
PEZONE v. Italy
PEZONE v. Italy ITA 18/03/2004 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention on account of a miscalculation of the applicant s sentence non deduction of detention on remand and inability to obtain EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43167
PICHKUR v. Ukraine
PICHKUR v. Ukraine UKR 07/02/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 15:31:54 Case Description: Discrimination with regard to property rights: Entitlement to the pension dependent on the retired person s place of residence resulting in the applicant s deprivation of his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15011
PILLA v. Italy
PILLA v. Italy ITA 02/06/2006 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:19:39 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention due to the belated delivery of a decision on remission of sentence i.e. after the date of actual release leading to an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-41789
PROKOPOVICH v. Russia
PROKOPOVICH v. Russia RUS 18/02/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Protection of private life and home: Unlawful eviction of the applicant from a flat after the death of her late partner who held tenancy rights to the flat. Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27530
Paksas v. Lithuania
Paksas v. Lithuania CCPR/C/110/D/2155/2012 Communication number s : 2155/2012 Author: Rolandas Paksas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Lithuania Submission date 24 Jun 2011 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2155/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1819/en-US
Palandjian and Palandjian v. Hungary
Palandjian and Palandjian v. Hungary CCPR/C/80/D/1106/2002 Communication number s : 1106/2002 Author: Rebecca Palandjian and Aghabab Palandjian Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Hungary Submission date 21 Jun 1999 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1106/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1052/en-US
Pauger (2) v. Austria
Pauger 2 v. Austria CCPR/C/65/D/716/1996 Communication number s : 716/1996 Author: Dietmar Pauger Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Austria Submission date 22 Jan 1996 Date of decision 25 Mar 1999 Comment: See also the author s JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/716/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/771/en-US
Penarrieta et al. v. Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
Penarrieta et al. v. Bolivia Plurinational State of CCPR/C/31/D/176/1984 Communication number s : 176/1984 Author: Juana Penarrieta Rose Mary Garcia Maria Pura de Toro Nelva B. de Toro Etty Caceres Maria Luisa de Ruiz Aurora de Lafuente Sofia de Rodriguez JUTBCCPR/C/31/D/176/1984https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/484/en-US
Perterer v. Austria
Perterer v. Austria CCPR/C/81/D/1015/2001 Communication number s : 1015/2001 Author: Paul Perterer Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Austria Submission date 31 Jul 2001 Date of decision 20 Jul 2004 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1015/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1124/en-US
Petersen v. Germany
Petersen v. Germany CCPR/C/80/D/1115/2002 Communication number s : 1115/2002 Author: Werner Petersen Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Germany Submission date 31 Jan 2002 Date of decision 01 Apr 2004 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1115/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/854/en-US
Pezoldova v. Czech Republic
Pezoldova v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/76/D/757/1997 Communication number s : 757/1997 Author: Alzbeta Pezoldova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Czech Republic Submission date 30 Sep 1996 Date of decision 25 Oct 2002 Comment: Two JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/757/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1025/en-US
Phillip v. Trinidad and Tobago
Phillip v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/64/D/594/1992 Communication number s : 594/1992 Author: Irving Phillip Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 13 Feb 1994 Date of decision 20 Oct 1998 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/64/D/594/1992https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/806/en-US
Piandiong et al. v. Philippines
Piandiong et al. v. Philippines CCPR/C/70/D/869/1999 Communication number s : 869/1999 Author: Alexander Padilla and Ricardo III Sunga legal counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 70 Country Philippines Submission date 15 Jun 1999 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/70/D/869/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/912/en-US
Preiss v. Czech Republic
Preiss v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/93/D/1497/2006 Communication number s : 1497/2006 Author: Richard Preiss Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Czech Republic Submission date 22 Mar 2006 Date of decision 17 Jul 2008 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1497/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1369/en-US
Prince v. South Africa
Prince v. South Africa CCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006 Communication number s : 1474/2006 Author: Gareth Anver Prince Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country South Africa Submission date 20 Oct 2005 Date of decision 31 Oct 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1380/en-US
Protocol No. 6 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms concerning the Abolition of the Death Penalty (ETS No. 114)
Protocol No. 6 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms concerning the Abolition of the Death Penalty ETS No. 114 114 Strasbourg 1983 04 28T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty COEETS No. 114https://rm.coe.int/168007952b