Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1521 - 1536 of 1536
Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
Report to HRC A/HRC/32/45/Add.1 from 7 December 2015 to 16 December 2015 12 May 2016 Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises Brazil United Nations A/HRC/32/45/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: UNSPA/HRC/32/45/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f32%2f45%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.2 from 28 August 2006 to 1 September 2006 23 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Ecuador UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
X. v. Czech Republic v. Czech Republic
X. v. Czech Republic v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/113/D/1961/2010 Communication number s : 1961/2010 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Czech Republic Submission date 04 Jan 2010 Date of decision 02 Apr 2015 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1961/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1952/en-US
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569
Yama and Khalid v. Slovakia
Yama and Khalid v. Slovakia CCPR/C/76/D/876/1999 Communication number s : 876/1999 Author: L. Yama and N. Khalid Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country Slovakia Submission date 02 Aug 1999 Date of decision 31 Oct 2002 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/876/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/934/en-US
Yoon and Choi v. Republic of Korea
Yoon and Choi v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/88/D/1321 1322/2004 Communication number s : 1322/2004 1321/2004 Author: Yeo Bum Yoon and Myung Jin Choi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 18 Oct 2004 JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1321-1322/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1323/en-US
Zündel (2) v. Canada
Z ndel 2 v. Canada CCPR/C/89/D/1341/2005 Communication number s : 1341/2005 Author: Ernst Z ndel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 89 Country Canada Submission date 24 Jan 2005 Date of decision 20 Mar 2007 Comment: Request for interim JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1341/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1332/en-US
ZAICEVS v. Latvia
ZAICEVS v. Latvia LVA 31/10/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:38 Case Description: Right of appeal in criminal matters: Inability to challenge a sentence to three days administrative detention for contempt of court an offence under the Code of Regulatory EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31212
ZAMBIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ZAMBIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/ZMB/CO/4 NULL 2023 03 28T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/ZMB/CO/4 International Covenant on Distr.: General 11 April 2023 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/ZMB/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/728d6fb2-d596-4fe2-8fed-9e77c87cd302
ZELENCHUK AND TSYTSYURA v. Ukraine
ZELENCHUK AND TSYTSYURA v. Ukraine UKR 22/08/2018 00:00:00 05/09/2018 11:48:13 Case Description: The cases 1 of this group concern the long lasting moratorium on the alienation of agricultural land found by the Court to be in violation of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50173
ZUSTOVIC v. Croatia
ZUSTOVIC v. Croatia HRV 22/07/2021 00:00:00 06/08/2021 16:22:04 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial on account of the applicant s inability under the Administrative Disputes Act to obtain reimbursement of costs of the judicial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58201
Zentralrat Deutscher Sinti und Roma et al. v. Germany
Zentralrat Deutscher Sinti und Roma et al. v. Germany CERD/C/72/D/38/2006 Communication number s : 038/2006 Author: Zentralrat Deutscher Sinti und Roma et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Germany Submission date 29 Aug 2006 JUTBCERD/C/72/D/38/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1732/en-US
de León Castro v. Spain
de Le n Castro v. Spain CCPR/C/95/D/1388/2005 Communication number s : 1388/2005 Author: Jos Luis de Le n Castro Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Spain Submission date 23 Aug 2004 Date of decision 19 Mar 2009 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1388/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1016/en-US
decision on the merits: Unione Nazionale Dirigenti dello Stato (UNADIS) v. Italy, Complaint No. 147/2017
decision on the merits: Unione Nazionale Dirigenti dello Stato UNADIS v. Italy Complaint No. 147/2017 ITA 01 01 000 01 02 000 01 04 000 04 01 000 04 04 000 05 00 000 06 04 000 24 00 163 91 00 163 2021 06 30 2021 11 10 European Committee of Social Rights ESCcc-147-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-147-2017-dmerits-en
v. Austria
v. Austria CCPR/C/44/D/415/1990 Communication number s : 415/1990 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 44 Country Austria Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCCPR/C/44/D/415/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1777/en-US