Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 4321 - 4340 of 4426
Third report on Albania
Third report on Albania ALB 2004 12 17 2005 06 14 CRI 2005 23 Third report on Albania Adopted on 17 December 2004 Strasbourg 14 June 2005 For further information about the work of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance ECRI and about the ECRIALB-CbC-III-2005-023-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ALB-CbC-III-2005-023-ENG
Third report on the Czech Republic
Third report on the Czech Republic CZE 2003 12 05 2004 06 08 CRI 2004 22 Council of Europe European Commission against Racism and Intolerance Third report on the Czech Republic Adopted on 5 December 2003 Strasbourg 8 June 2004 Table of contents ECRICZE-CbC-III-2004-022-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CZE-CbC-III-2004-022-ENG
Third report on "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"
Third report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 2004 06 25 2005 02 15 CRI 2005 4 Third report on the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Adopted on 25 June 2004 Strasbourg 15 February 2005 For further information about the work of the ECRIMKD-CbC-III-2005-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MKD-CbC-III-2005-004-ENG
Timoshenko v. Belarus
Timoshenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/114/D/1950/2010 Communication number s : 1950/2010 Author: Viktor Timoshenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Belarus Submission date 26 Jan 2009 Date of decision 22 Jul 2015 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/1950/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1964/en-US
Tolipkhuzhaev v. Uzbekistan
Tolipkhuzhaev v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/96/D/1280/2004 Communication number s : 1280/2004 Author: Akbarkhudzh Tolipkhuzhaev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 06 May 2004 Date of decision 22 Jul 2009 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1280/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1526/en-US
Tulyaganov v. Uzbekistan
Tulyaganov v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/90/D/1041/2001 Communication number s : 1041/2001 Author: Shevkhie Tulyaganova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 12 Dec 2001 Date of decision 20 Jul 2007 Comment: Under JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1041/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1396/en-US
Turchenyak et al. v. Belarus
Turchenyak et al. v. Belarus CCPR/C/108/D/1948/2010 Communication number s : 1948/2010 Author: Denis Turchenyak et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Belarus Submission date 21 Nov 2009 Date of decision 24 Jul 2013 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/1948/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1672/en-US
UKRAINE: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
UKRAINE: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/UKR/CO/5 6 NULL 2022 10 27T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/UKR/CO/5 6 Convention on the Distr.: General 27 October 2022 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/UKR/CO/5-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/24a45b85-6be2-4e53-99b4-aac0d529bf03
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CERD/C/USA/CO/10 12 NULL 2022 09 21T00:00:00 CERD United Nations CERD/C/USA/CO/10 12 International Convention on Distr.: General 21 September 2022 the Elimination of All Forms Original: English of Racial UHRICERD/C/USA/CO/10-12https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/133396dd-9f5b-43ae-8926-28144f817762
UPR Trust Funds: achievements, good practices and lessons learned over the past 15 years and optimized support to States in the implementation of recommendations emanating from the fourth cycle
In three cycles since its establishment by the Human Rights Council the UPR has evolved into a unique peer review process to prepare for to undergo and to support a comprehensive and consistently regular check up of the status of human rights in all UN UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/statements/2023/03/upr-trust-funds-achievements-good-practices-and-lessons-learned-over-past-15
URUGUAY: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
URUGUAY: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CMW/C/URY/CO/1 NULL 2014 05 01T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/URY/CO/1 International Convention on the Distr.: General 2 May 2014 Protection of the Rights of English All Migrant Workers and Original: Spanish Members of UHRICMW/C/URY/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/5d150656-9732-4d94-bf23-e070e3e60547
Uteeva v. Uzbekistan
Uteeva v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/91/D/1150/2003 Communication number s : 1150/2003 Author: Roza Uteeva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 07 Jan 2003 Date of decision 26 Oct 2007 Comment: Under rule 92 of its JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1150/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1358/en-US
V.D.A. v. Argentina
V.D.A. v. Argentina CCPR/C/101/D/1608/2007 Communication number s : 1608/2007 Author: V.D.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Argentina Submission date 25 May 2007 Date of decision 29 Mar 2011 Comment: In accordance with article JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1608/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1611/en-US
V.F.C. v. Spain
V.F.C. v. Spain CRPD/C/21/D/34/2015 Communication number s : 034/2015 Author: V.F.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 21 Country Spain Submission date 16 Oct 2015 Date of decision 02 Apr 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/21/D/34/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2515/en-US
V.L. v. Belarus
V.L. v. Belarus CCPR/C/116/D/2084/2011 Communication number s : 2084/2011 Author: Vladimir Lemesh Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 116 Country Belarus Submission date 03 Nov 2010 Date of decision 30 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2084/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2102/en-US
V.P. v. Belarus
V.P. v. Belarus CCPR/C/122/D/2166/2012 Communication number s : 2166/2012 Author: V.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 122 Country Belarus Submission date 27 May 2012 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2166/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2381/en-US
V.S. v. Belarus
V.S. v. Belarus CCPR/C/122/D/2182/2012 Communication number s : 2182/2012 Author: V.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 122 Country Belarus Submission date 15 Nov 2010 Date of decision 27 Mar 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2182/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2436/en-US
VICENTE CARDOSO v. Portugal
VICENTE CARDOSO v. Portugal PRT 12/03/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 15:51:34 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the excessive length of the proceedings in the civil courts of first instance including enforcement proceedings and in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8787
VIET NAM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
VIET NAM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/VNM/CO/5 6 NULL 2022 10 21T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/VNM/CO/5 6 Convention on the Distr.: General 21 October 2022 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/VNM/CO/5-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/9c66399f-cabd-48bd-93f2-71d3eac460e3
VISIT TO AZERBAIJAN - REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE RIGHT TO FOOD
VISIT TO AZERBAIJAN REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE RIGHT TO FOOD A/HRC/43/44/ADD.1 NULL 2020 01 15T00:00:00 SR Food United Nations A/HRC/43/44/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 15 January 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty UHRIA/HRC/43/44/ADD.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/7c5a6e01-0ddd-4089-b218-e908a71350c6