Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 161 - 180 of 3690
Brychta v. Czech Republic
Brychta v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/97/D/1618/2007 Communication number s : 1618/2007 Author: Frantisek Brychta Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 97 Country Czech Republic Submission date 20 Sep 2006 Date of decision 27 Oct 2009 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/97/D/1618/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1547/en-US
Bujdosó v. Hungary
Bujdos v. Hungary CRPD/C/10/D/4/2011 Communication number s : 004/2011 Author: J nos Fiala Disability Rights Center Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 10 Country Hungary Submission date 14 Sep 2011 Date of decision 09 Sep 2013 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/10/D/4/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1988/en-US
Burdyko v. Belarus
Burdyko v. Belarus CCPR/C/114/D/2017/2010 Communication number s : 2017/2010 Author: Andrei Burdyko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Belarus Submission date 17 Dec 2010 Date of decision 15 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2017/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1977/en-US
Butovenko v. Ukraine
Butovenko v. Ukraine CCPR/C/102/D/1412/2005 Communication number s : 1412/2005 Author: Aleksandr Butovenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Ukraine Submission date 28 Mar 2005 Date of decision 19 Jul 2011 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1412/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1207/en-US
Byrne and Lazarescu v. Canada
Byrne and Lazarescu v. Canada CCPR/C/65/D/742/1997 Communication number s : 742/1997 Author: Pamela R. M. Byrne and Linda E. Lazarescu Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 65 Country Canada Submission date 23 Apr 1996 Date of decision 25 JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/742/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/775/en-US
C.B.D. v. Netherlands
C.B.D. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/45/D/394/1990 Communication number s : 394/1990 Author: C.B.D. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 45 Country Netherlands Submission date 09 Jan 1990 Date of decision 22 Jul 1992 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/45/D/394/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/632/en-US
C.M. v. Switzerland
C.M. v. Switzerland CAT/C/44/D/355/2008 Communication number s : 355/2008 Author: C.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 44 Country Switzerland Submission date 28 Jul 2008 Date of decision 14 May 2010 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/44/D/355/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/67/en-US
C v. Russian Federation
C v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/121/D/2025/2011 Communication number s : 2025/2011 Author: C Type of decision: Discontinuance decision Session No 121 Country Russian Federation Submission date 02 Nov 2009 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2025/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2370/en-US
CABO VERDE: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
CABO VERDE: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CMW/C/CPV/CO/1 3 NULL 2022 06 01T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/CPV/CO/1 3 International Convention on the Distr.: General 2 June 2022 Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Original: English Members of UHRICMW/C/CPV/CO/1-3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f71f2e34-3d43-4420-81cf-983436826d94
CABRAL v. the Netherlands
CABRAL v. the Netherlands NLD 28/11/2018 00:00:00 11/12/2018 15:45:04 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the applicant s conviction on the sole basis of the statements of his co accused EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50907
CAFAGNA v. Italy
CAFAGNA v. Italy ITA 12/01/2018 00:00:00 13/02/2018 11:26:20 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the restriction of the applicant s defence rights resulting in his conviction on the basis of a statement made by an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48795
CAKA v. Albania
CAKA v. Albania ALB 08/03/2010 00:00:00 24/10/2016 16:48:47 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings leading to convictions to terms of imprisonment with regard to following shortcomings: failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-233
CALMANOVICI v. Romania
CALMANOVICI v. Romania ROU 01/10/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Cases mainly concerning irregularities of detention: unjustified extension of the detention on remand lack of immediate appeal against court decisions extending detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16415
CANSAD AND OTHERS v. Turkey
CANSAD AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 13/06/2018 00:00:00 29/06/2018 15:03:37 Case Description: Functioning of justice and lack of a remedy: Unfair criminal proceedings due to their excessive length and lack of access to a lawyer during the initial stage of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49703
CARMEL SALIBA v. Malta
CARMEL SALIBA v. Malta MLT 24/04/2017 00:00:00 24/05/2017 17:23:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings concerning civil liability for a robbery due to the combination of procedural shortcomings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46865
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA 7144/15 BOJIC I. VRANJICAN DEREK T. DRENSKI LASAN V. HRV 6/20/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD000714415https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194217
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A.B. v. SLOVAKIA
CASE OF A.B. v. SLOVAKIA 41784/98 SVK 3/4/2003 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 with regard to refusal to appoint a lawyer No violation of Art. 6 1 with regard to alleged arbitrariness of decision Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0304JUD004178498https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60965
CASE OF A.D. AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF A.D. AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 22681/09 YILMAZ A. YILMAZ S.N. TUR 7/22/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Lawful arrest or detention Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0722JUD002268109https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145708