Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 5741 - 5760 of 5857
Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
State comment on Report A/HRC/29/28/Add.4 from 18 August 2014 to 27 August 2014 15 May 2015 Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises Azerbaijan United Nations A/HRC/29/28/Add.4 General UNSPA/HRC/29/28/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f29%2f28%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/7/7/Add.2 from 29 January 2007 to 2 February 2007 4 February 2008 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Peru UNITED NATIONS UNSPA/HRC/7/7/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f7%2f7%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/7/7/Add.3 from 14 May 2007 to 18 May 2007 8 January 2008 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Fiji UNITED NATIONS A General UNSPA/HRC/7/7/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f7%2f7%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/18/32/Add.4 from 12 June 2011 to 16 June 2011 12 August 2011 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Iraq United Nations UNSPA/HRC/18/32/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f18%2f32%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
State comment on Report A/HRC/42/42/Add.3 from 16 April 2018 to 23 April 2018 12 September 2019 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Chad UNSPA/HRC/42/42/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f42%2f42%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/42/42/Add.1 from 16 April 2018 to 23 April 2018 2 July 2019 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Chad United Nations UNSPA/HRC/42/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f42%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Wright v. Jamaica
Wright v. Jamaica CCPR/C/45/D/349/1989 Communication number s : 349/1989 Author: Clifton Wright Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Jamaica Submission date 12 Jan 1989 Date of decision 27 Jul 1992 Comment: Individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/45/D/349/1989https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/423/en-US
Wuyts v. Netherlands
Wuyts v. Netherlands CCPR/C/69/D/785/1997 Communication number s : 785/1997 Author: Alexandre Wuyts Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Netherlands Submission date 24 Jun 1996 Date of decision 17 Jul 2000 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/785/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/884/en-US
X. H. L. v. Netherlands
X. H. L. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/102/D/1564/2007 Communication number s : 1564/2007 Author: X. H. L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Netherlands Submission date 08 Jan 2007 Date of decision 22 Jul 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1564/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1507/en-US
X. J. v. Netherlands
X. J. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/105/D/1840/2008 Communication number s : 1840/2008 Author: X. J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Netherlands Submission date 08 Sep 2008 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1840/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1249/en-US
X.Q.H. v. New Zealand
X.Q.H. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/110/D/2197/2012 Communication number s : 2197/2012 Author: X.Q.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country New Zealand Submission date 22 Mar 2012 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2197/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1821/en-US
X.Q.L. v. Australia
X.Q.L. v. Australia CAT/C/52/D/455/2011 Communication number s : 455/2011 Author: X.Q.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 52 Country Australia Submission date 03 Mar 2011 Date of decision 02 May 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/52/D/455/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1828/en-US
X, Y, and Z v. Sweden
X Y and Z v. Sweden CAT/C/20/D/61/1996 Communication number s : 061/1996 Author: X Y and Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Sweden Submission date 27 Jun 1996 Date of decision 06 May 1998 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/20/D/61/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/247/en-US
X and Y v. Netherlands
X and Y v. Netherlands CAT/C/15/D/31/1995 Communication number s : 031/1995 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 15 Country Netherlands Submission date 19 Sep 1995 Date of decision 20 Nov 1995 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/15/D/31/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/224/en-US
X and Z v. Finland
X and Z v. Finland CAT/C/52/D/485/2011 Communication number s : 483/2011 485/2011 Author: Mr. X and Mr. Z both represented by Marjaana Laine of the Refugee Advice Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Finland Submission date 14 JUTBCAT/C/52/D/485/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3225/en-US
X. v. Afghanistan,Sweden
X. v. Afghanistan Sweden CCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008 Communication number s : 1833/2008 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Afghanistan Sweden Submission date 26 Nov 2008 Date of decision 01 Nov 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1390/en-US
X. v. Argentina
X. v. Argentina CRPD/C/11/D/8/2012 Communication number s : 008/2012 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 16 Country Argentina Submission date 22 Jun 2012 Date of decision 11 Apr 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/11/D/8/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1989/en-US
X v. Australia,Lebanon
X v. Australia Lebanon CAT/C/42/D/324/2007 Communication number s : 324/2007 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 42 Country Australia Lebanon Submission date 02 May 2007 Date of decision 30 Apr 2009 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/42/D/324/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/69/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
X v. Canada
X v. Canada CAT/C/67/D/791/2016 Communication number s : 791/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Sergei Voronov Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Canada Submission date 08 Dec 2016 Date of decision 05 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/791/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2678/en-US