Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 6781 - 6800 of 6829
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/30/34/Add.1 from 7 October 2014 to 10 October 2014 17 August 2015 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination C te d Ivoire United UNSPA/HRC/30/34/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f30%2f34%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/42/42/Add.1 from 16 April 2018 to 23 April 2018 2 July 2019 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Chad United Nations UNSPA/HRC/42/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f42%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/36/47/Add.1 from 10 October 2016 to 19 October 2016 12 September 2017 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Central African UNSPA/HRC/36/47/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f36%2f47%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X and Y v. Georgia
X and Y v. Georgia CEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009 Communication number s : 024/2009 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Georgia Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2051/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/66/D/776/2016 Communication number s : 776/2016 Author: X and Y represented by counsel Marcel Zirngast Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Switzerland Submission date 19 Oct 2016 Date of decision 23 Apr JUTBCAT/C/66/D/776/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2581/en-US
X v. Australia,Lebanon
X v. Australia Lebanon CAT/C/42/D/324/2007 Communication number s : 324/2007 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 42 Country Australia Lebanon Submission date 02 May 2007 Date of decision 30 Apr 2009 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/42/D/324/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/69/en-US
X v. Canada
X v. Canada CAT/C/67/D/791/2016 Communication number s : 791/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Sergei Voronov Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Canada Submission date 08 Dec 2016 Date of decision 05 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/791/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2678/en-US
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984
X v. Hungary
X v. Hungary CCPR/C/125/D/2901/2016 Communication number s : 2901/2016 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country Hungary Submission date 08 Dec 2016 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2901/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3285/en-US
X v. Latvia
X v. Latvia CCPR/C/136/D/3254/2018 Communication number s : 3254/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Latvia Submission date 02 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3254/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3494/en-US
X v. Norway
X v. Norway CCPR/C/115/D/2474/2014 Communication number s : 2474/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Norway Submission date 28 Oct 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2474/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2018/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/900/2018 Communication number s : 900/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 Dec 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/900/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3362/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/67/D/775/2016 Communication number s : 775/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Roman Schuler Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Switzerland Submission date 24 Oct 2016 Date of decision 05 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/775/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2625/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date 16 Feb 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2638/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2428/en-US
Y.A.A. and F.H.M. v. Denmark
Y.A.A. and F.H.M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2681/2015 Communication number s : 2681/2015 Author: Y.A.A. and F.H.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Nov 2015 Date of decision 10 Mar 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2681/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2293/en-US
Y AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
Y AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 05/09/2022 00:00:00 19/09/2022 09:34:09 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to protect the life of a woman who was a victim of domestic violence had filed several complaints stating that she feared for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61103
Y.B.F., S.A.Q. and Y.Y. v. Switzerland
Y.B.F. S.A.Q. and Y.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/50/D/467/2011 Communication number s : 467/2011 Author: Y.B.F. S.A.Q. and Y.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Switzerland Submission date 24 Jun 2011 Date of decision 31 May 2013 JUTBCAT/C/50/D/467/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3/en-US
Y.B. and N.S. v. Belgium
Y.B. and N.S. v. Belgium CRC/C/79/D/12/2017 Communication number s : 012/2017 Author: Y.B. and N.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Belgium Submission date 22 Mar 2017 Date of decision 27 Sep 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/79/D/12/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2421/en-US
Y.F. v. Panama
Y.F. v. Panama CRC/C/83/D/48/2018 Communication number s : 048/2018 Author: Y.F. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Panama Submission date 21 Jun 2018 Date of decision 03 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/83/D/48/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2630/en-US