Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 4541 - 4555 of 4555
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/7/7/Add.3 from 14 May 2007 to 18 May 2007 8 January 2008 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Fiji UNITED NATIONS A General UNSPA/HRC/7/7/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f7%2f7%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/42/42/Add.1 from 16 April 2018 to 23 April 2018 2 July 2019 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Chad United Nations UNSPA/HRC/42/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f42%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/66/D/776/2016 Communication number s : 776/2016 Author: X and Y represented by counsel Marcel Zirngast Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Switzerland Submission date 19 Oct 2016 Date of decision 23 Apr JUTBCAT/C/66/D/776/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2581/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/75/D/1081/2021 Communication number s : 1081/2021 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Switzerland Submission date 10 Jun 2021 Date of decision 11 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1081/2021https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3613/en-US
X v. Australia
X v. Australia CCPR/C/126/D/3580/2019 Communication number s : 3580/2019 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Australia Submission date 25 May 2018 Date of decision 26 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/3580/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3304/en-US
X v. Canada
X v. Canada CAT/C/67/D/791/2016 Communication number s : 791/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Sergei Voronov Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Canada Submission date 08 Dec 2016 Date of decision 05 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/791/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2678/en-US
X v. Colombia
X v. Colombia CCPR/C/89/D/1361/2005 Communication number s : 1361/2005 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Colombia Submission date 13 Jan 2001 Date of decision 30 Mar 2007 Comment: An individual opinion co signed by JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1361/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1338/en-US
X v. Spain
X v. Spain CCPR/C/93/D/1456/2006 Communication number s : 1456/2006 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Spain Submission date 14 Feb 2006 Date of decision 24 Jul 2008 Comment: The texts of two individual opinions one JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1456/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1448/en-US
Y.F. v. Panama
Y.F. v. Panama CRC/C/83/D/48/2018 Communication number s : 048/2018 Author: Y.F. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Panama Submission date 21 Jun 2018 Date of decision 03 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/83/D/48/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2630/en-US
Y.Z.S. v. Australia
Y.Z.S. v. Australia CAT/C/49/D/417/2010 Communication number s : 417/2010 Author: Y.Z.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Australia Submission date 30 Mar 2010 Date of decision 23 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/49/D/417/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/25/en-US
Y v. Canada
Y v. Canada CAT/C/55/D/512/2012 Communication number s : 512/2012 Author: Y Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 55 Country Canada Submission date 06 Jan 2012 Date of decision 28 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/55/D/512/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1980/en-US
decision on the merits: Unione Nazionale Dirigenti dello Stato (UNADIS) v. Italy, Complaint No. 147/2017
decision on the merits: Unione Nazionale Dirigenti dello Stato UNADIS v. Italy Complaint No. 147/2017 ITA 01 01 000 01 02 000 01 04 000 04 01 000 04 04 000 05 00 000 06 04 000 24 00 163 91 00 163 2021 06 30 2021 11 10 European Committee of Social Rights ESCcc-147-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-147-2017-dmerits-en
Ángela Sariego Rodríguez and Ionut-Cosmin Dincă v. Spain
ngela Sariego Rodr guez and Ionut Cosmin Dinc v. Spain E/C.12/70/D/92/2019 Communication number s : 092/2019 Author: ngela Sariego Rodr guez and Ionut Cosmin Dinc Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 To be confirmed Country Spain JUTBE/C.12/70/D/92/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2986/en-US
v. Algeria
v. Algeria CAT/C/52/D/402/2009 Communication number s : 402/2009 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Algeria Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/52/D/402/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1832/en-US
v. Denmark,France,Paraguay,Switzerland
v. Denmark France Paraguay Switzerland CRC/C/92/2 Communication number s : 109/2019 79/2019 77/2019 83/2019 31/201774/2019 .30/2017 Author: Type of decision: Follow up report Session No 92 Country Denmark France Paraguay Switzerland Submission date Date JUTBCRC/C/92/2https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3755/en-US