Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 50
11. Convention on the Rights of the Child
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. Convention on the Rights of the Child New York 20 November 1989 Entry into force : 2 September 1990 in accordance with article 49 1 . Registration : 2 September 1990 No. 27531 Status : UNIV-11https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11&chapter=4&clang=_en
11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 12 February 2002 in accordance UNIV-11-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
8. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 8. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women New York 18 December 1979 1 Entry into force : 3 September 1981 in accordance with article 27 1 . Registration : 3 UNIV-8https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-8&chapter=4&clang=_en
A/HRC/47/11: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Oman
United Nations A/HRC/47/11 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/11https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4711-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-oman
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24027/07 11949/08 36742/08 66911/09 67354/09 PEIRCE G. COOPER B. ARANI M. JONES A. BRANDON B. RAJA A. JONES J. GBR 4/10/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD002402707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110267
CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 42184/05 OTTY T. OLBOURNE B. GBR 11/4/2008 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 14 P1 1 238 343 100 258 369 311 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104JUD004218405 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104JUD004218405https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-89309
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF HARKINS AND EDWARDS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HARKINS AND EDWARDS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9146/07 32650/07 Aslam Y. Rasool L. GBR 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Extradition Conditional United States of America No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD000914607https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108599
CASE OF MONT BLANC TRADING LTD AND ANTARES TITANIUM TRADING LTD v. UKRAINE
CASE OF MONT BLANC TRADING LTD AND ANTARES TITANIUM TRADING LTD v. UKRAINE 11161/08 LANDOLT P. UKR 1/14/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Equality of arms Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0114JUD001116108https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207406
CASE OF PELLADOAH v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF PELLADOAH v. THE NETHERLANDS 16737/90 N/A NLD 9/22/1994 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 c Not necessary to examine Art. 6 2 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 270 339 348 399 403 500h 445 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0922JUD001673790https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57902
CASE OF SIC - SOCIEDADE INDEPENDENTE DE COMUNICAÇÃO v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF SIC SOCIEDADE INDEPENDENTE DE COMUNICA O v. PORTUGAL 29856/13 CORREIRA AFONSO R. PRT 7/27/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Article 41 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0727JUD002985613https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-211572
CASE OF SUKHOVETSKYY v. UKRAINE
CASE OF SUKHOVETSKYY v. UKRAINE 13716/02 N/A UKR 3/28/2006 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 3 Not necessary to examine under Art. 14 P1 3 Article 43 of the Law on Parliamentary Elections 2001 Article 24 of the Constitution 343 100 353 574 476 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0328JUD001371602https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-72893
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24724/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002472494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58593
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24888/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002488894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58594
CASE OF VALIULIENĖ v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF VALIULIEN v. LITHUANIA 33234/07 MICKEVICIUS H. LTU 3/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Positive obligations Substantive aspect Non pecuniary damage award Article 116 of the old Criminal Code Article 140 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0326JUD003323407https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117636
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 66069/09 130/10 3896/10 CREIGHTON S. WOODS B. Chivers Solicitors GBR 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading punishment Inhuman ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD006606909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108610
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS ON THE 15TH TO THE 19TH PERIODIC REPORTS OF MAURITIUS, ADOPTED BY THE COMMITTEE AT ITS 82ND SESSION, 11 FEBRUARY-1 MARCH 2013 : COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS ON THE 15TH TO THE 19TH PERIODIC REPORTS OF MAURITIUS ADOPTED BY THE COMMITTEE AT ITS 82ND SESSION 11 FEBRUARY 1 MARCH 2013 : COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION CERD/C/MUS/CO/15 19 NULL 2013 04 18T00:00:00 CERD UHRICERD/C/MUS/CO/15-19https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/07968eae-e725-47dc-af5a-cc03375abc56
Chytil v. Czech Republic
Chytil v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/90/D/1452/2006 Communication number s : 1452/2006 Author: Renatus J. Chytil Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 90 Country Czech Republic Submission date 16 Jan 2006 Date of decision 24 Jul 2007 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1452/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1001/en-US
Concluding Observations on the 8th Periodic Report Of Mauritius
Concluding Observations on the 8th Periodic Report Of Mauritius CEDAW/C/MUS/CO/8 NULL 2018 11 14T00:00:00 CEDAW Concluding observations on the eighth periodic report of Mauritius 1.The Committee considered the eighth periodic report of Mauritius UHRICEDAW/C/MUS/CO/8https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8e7de672-61e0-48ef-92e5-0cc1a1bbcf80