Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 45
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY 30254/18 ANDRESEN K.S.S. NOR 3/24/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0324JUD003025418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216348
CASE OF AHRENS v. GERMANY
CASE OF AHRENS v. GERMANY 45071/09 RIXE G. DEU 3/22/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Respect for private life No violation of Article 14 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0322JUD004507109https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109815
CASE OF ALEXANDRU ENACHE v. ROMANIA
CASE OF ALEXANDRU ENACHE v. ROMANIA 16986/12 BARTHA S.D. MIRCIOI N. ROU 10/3/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae Violation of Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1003JUD001698612https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-177677
CASE OF BEELER v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF BEELER v. SWITZERLAND 78630/12 LUGINB HL J. CHE 10/11/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae Violation of Article 14 8 1 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1011JUD007863012https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-220073
CASE OF BELLI AND ARQUIER-MARTINEZ v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF BELLI AND ARQUIER MARTINEZ v. SWITZERLAND 65550/13 SAMBUC H. P. CHE 12/11/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1211JUD006555013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-188649
CASE OF BERGER-KRALL AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA
CASE OF BERGER KRALL AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA 14717/04 EFERIN LAW FIRM SVN 6/12/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Remainder inadmissible Article 34 Victim No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0612JUD001471704https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-144669
CASE OF BRITISH GURKHA WELFARE SOCIETY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BRITISH GURKHA WELFARE SOCIETY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 44818/11 E. COOPER OF SLATER AND GORDON UK LLP GBR 9/15/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 14 P1 1 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0915JUD004481811https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-166691
CASE OF BUCHS v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF BUCHS v. SWITZERLAND 9929/12 PERRET N. CHE 5/27/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 37 1 b Matter resolved Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527JUD000992912https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-144138
CASE OF BURDEN AND BURDEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BURDEN AND BURDEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 13378/05 GEDYE E. GBR 12/12/2006 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 14 P1 1 The Inheritance Tax Act 1984 The Civil Partnership Act 2004 14 128 109 183 498 238 343 100 298 292 369 304 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1212JUD001337805https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-78427
CASE OF CERNEA v. ROMANIA
CASE OF CERNEA v. ROMANIA 43609/10 ROU 2/27/2018 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 14 P1 3 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Right to free elections general Free expression of the opinion of the people ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0227JUD004360910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-181372
CASE OF CHALDAYEV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF CHALDAYEV v. RUSSIA 33172/16 TOLMACHEVA M.V. RUS 5/28/2019 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0528JUD003317216https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-193262
CASE OF ĒCIS v. LATVIA
CASE OF CIS v. LATVIA 12879/09 ALLIKS A. LVA 1/10/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0110JUD001287909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-188991
CASE OF D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 57325/00 LORD LESTER OF HERNE HILL QC GOLDSTON J. STRUPEK D. CZE 11/13/2007 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 14 P1 2 General measures refused ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1113JUD005732500https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83256
CASE OF ŞERİFE YİĞİT v. TURKEY
CASE OF ER FE Y T v. TURKEY 3976/05 TANRIKULU M.S. KIRIK N. TUR 11/2/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 14 P1 1 No violation of Art. 8 Social Security Act Articles 134 and 143 of the Civil ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102JUD000397605https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-101579
CASE OF EWEIDA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF EWEIDA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 48420/10 36516/10 51671/10 59842/10 AUGHTON AINSWORTH P. DIAMOND ORMERODS GBR 1/15/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 9 Freedom of thought conscience and religion Article 9 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0115JUD004842010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115881
CASE OF FÁBIÁN v. HUNGARY
CASE OF F BI N v. HUNGARY 78117/13 GR D A. HUN 9/5/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Deprivation of property Peaceful enjoyment of possessions ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0905JUD007811713https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-176769
CASE OF FREITAG v. GERMANY
CASE OF FREITAG v. GERMANY 71440/01 KLAUKE U. DEU 7/19/2007 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 6 Remainder inadmissible Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0719JUD007144001https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-81783
CASE OF H. v. FINLAND
CASE OF H. v. FINLAND 37359/09 UOTI K. FIN 11/13/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for private life No violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD003735909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-114486
CASE OF HOPPEN AND TRADE UNION OF AB AMBER GRID EMPLOYEES v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF HOPPEN AND TRADE UNION OF AB AMBER GRID EMPLOYEES v. LITHUANIA 976/20 PA KEVI I T A. LTU 1/17/2023 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 14 11 1 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0117JUD000097620https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-222320
CASE OF HORVÁTH AND KISS v. HUNGARY
CASE OF HORV TH AND KISS v. HUNGARY 11146/11 FARKAS L. HUN 1/29/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 14 P1 2 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 Right to education general National ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0129JUD001114611https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-116124