Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 80
CASE OF A.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS 37328/97 N/A NLD 1/29/2002 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion Violation of Art. 8 in respect of control of correspondence with the Commission and with lawyer No violation of Art. 8 in respect of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0129JUD003732897https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60019
CASE OF A.D. AND O.D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A.D. AND O.D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 28680/06 MOLE N. GBR 3/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 13 8 No violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage award Section 23 6 of the Children Act 1989 238 354 444 110 451 268 376 425 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316JUD002868006https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97636
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND 28761/11 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD002876111https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146044
CASE OF ARKHESTOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ARKHESTOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 22089/07 SOLVANG O.E. LEMA TRE R. MALTSEVA A. YEZHOVA E. NIKOLAYEV A. AVETISYAN G. BOYARCHUK D. ITSLAYEV D. KOGAN V. SAKALOV A. DOROGOVA L. RUS 1/16/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0116JUD002208907https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-140012
CASE OF B. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF B. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9840/82 N/A GBR 7/8/1987 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 6 1 Just satisfaction reserved Children and Young Persons Act 1969 Children Act 1975 Child Care Act 1980 451 425 268 203 445 41 7 444 110 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0708JUD000984082https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57453
CASE OF BAGIYEVA v. UKRAINE
CASE OF BAGIYEVA v. UKRAINE 41085/05 SIZONENKO V. UKR 4/28/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for home Violation of Article 13 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0428JUD004108505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-162213
CASE OF BECK, COPP AND BAZELEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BECK COPP AND BAZELEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 48535/99 48536/99 48537/99 GBR 10/22/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 No separate issue under Art. 14 8 No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 14 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 10 Not necessary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1022JUD004853599https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60697
CASE OF BENSAID v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BENSAID v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 44599/98 N/A GBR 2/6/2001 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 13 350 193 192 451 429 203 268 107 333 329 444 110 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0206JUD004459998 THIRD SECTION CASE OF ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0206JUD004459998https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59206
CASE OF BERKOVA v. SLOVAKIA
CASE OF BERKOVA v. SLOVAKIA 67149/01 N/A SVK 3/24/2009 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 13 6 1 Damage claim dismissed 14 128 238 354 445 40 136 406 444 110 451 268 358 376 429 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0324JUD006714901https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91802
CASE OF BLAJ v. ROMANIA [Extracts]
CASE OF BLAJ v. ROMANIA Extracts 36259/04 POPESCU C. L. ROU 4/8/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 6 6 3 c Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Article 6 3 c Defence through legal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0408JUD003625904https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142529
CASE OF BRONDA v. ITALY
CASE OF BRONDA v. ITALY 22430/93 N/A ITA 6/9/1998 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Civil Code Article 333 Code of Civil Procedure Article 373 451 203 425 268 376 238 444 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0609JUD002243093 CASE OF BRONDA ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0609JUD002243093https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58194
CASE OF BURANDO HOLDING B.v. AND PORT INVEST v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF BURANDO HOLDING B.v. AND PORT INVEST v. THE NETHERLANDS 3124/16 3205/16 BRAVENBOER H.A. NLD 5/16/2023 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for correspondence Respect for home ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0516JUD000312416https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-224734
CASE OF C.G. AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
CASE OF C.G. AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA 1365/07 EKIMDZHIEV M. BONCHEVA K. BGR 4/24/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 13 Violation of P7 1 Non pecuniary damage award Costs and expenses award Sections 10 42 44 46 of the 1998 Aliens Act ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0424JUD000136507https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-86093
CASE OF CAMENZIND v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF CAMENZIND v. SWITZERLAND 21353/93 N/A CHE 12/16/1997 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Preliminary objection rejected Violation of Art. 13 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1216JUD002135393https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58125
CASE OF CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 7819/77 7878/77 N/A GBR 6/28/1984 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection partially allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 6 3 b Violation of Art. 6 3 c Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0628JUD000781977https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57456
CASE OF CONNORS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CONNORS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 66746/01 N/A GBR 5/27/2004 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 No separate issue under Art. 14 8 No separate issue under P1 1 No separate issue under Art. 6 No violation of Art. 6 No violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0527JUD006674601https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61795
CASE OF DANKEVICH v. UKRAINE
CASE OF DANKEVICH v. UKRAINE 40679/98 N/A UKR 4/29/2003 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 8 with regard to initial period No violation of Art. 8 with regard to later period Violation of Art. 13 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0429JUD004067998https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61062
CASE OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DE WILDE OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM 2832/66 2835/66 2899/66 N/A BEL 6/18/1971 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection partially allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 5 4 No violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 4 No ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0618JUD000283266https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57606
CASE OF DRAKSAS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF DRAKSAS v. LITHUANIA 36662/04 GAUDUTIS J. LTU 7/31/2012 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for correspondence Respect for private life No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0731JUD003666204https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-112588
CASE OF ERIKSSON v. SWEDEN
CASE OF ERIKSSON v. SWEDEN 11373/85 N/A SWE 6/22/1989 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of P1 2 and 13 P1 2 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0622JUD001137385https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57481