Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1561 - 1580 of 1702
T.T.P. v. Australia
T.T.P. v. Australia CAT/C/65/D/756/2016 Communication number s : 756/2016 Author: T.T.P. represented by counsel Mr. John Phillip Sweeney Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 65 Country Australia Submission date 25 May 2016 Date of JUTBCAT/C/65/D/756/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2474/en-US
T.V. and A.G. v. Uzbekistan
T.V. and A.G. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/116/D/2044/2011 Communication number s : 2044/2011 Author: T.V. and A.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 16 Feb 2009 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2044/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2101/en-US
T.Z. v. Switzerland
T.Z. v. Switzerland CAT/C/62/D/688/2015 Communication number s : 688/2015 Author: T.Z. represented by counsel Stephanie Motz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Switzerland Submission date 07 Jul 2015 Date of decision 22 Nov 2017 JUTBCAT/C/62/D/688/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2334/en-US
T v. Australia
T v. Australia CAT/C/58/D/599/2014 Communication number s : 599/2014 Author: T Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Australia Submission date 30 Apr 2014 Date of decision 03 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/58/D/599/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3011/en-US
T. v. Australia
T. v. Australia CCPR/C/61/D/706/1996 Communication number s : 706/1996 Author: G.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Australia Submission date 10 May 1996 Date of decision 04 Nov 1997 Comment: Pursuant to rule 85 of the Committee JUTBCCPR/C/61/D/706/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/374/en-US
Taito Fa’afete v. New Zealand
Taito Fa afete v. New Zealand CCPR/C/114/D/1909/2009 Communication number s : 1909/2009 Author: Tony Ellis counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country New Zealand Submission date 12 May 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/1909/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1983/en-US
Tatyana v. Poland
Tatyana v. Poland CCPR/C/101/D/1517/2006 Communication number s : 1517/2006 Author: Tatyana Rastorgueva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Poland Submission date 25 Sep 2006 Date of decision 28 Mar 2011 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1517/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1616/en-US
Tenth session of the Human Rights Council's Universal Periodic Review to be held from 24 January to 4 February 2011
Human Rights Council Universal Periodic Review 20 January 2011BACKGROUND RELEASE Sixteen Countries Will Have Their Human Rights Records Examined Sixteen States will have their human rights records examined during the tenth session of the Human Rights UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/01/tenth-session-human-rights-councils-universal-periodic-review-be-held-24
Tharchanamoorthy v. Australia
Tharchanamoorthy v. Australia CAT/C/72/D/944/2019 Communication number s : 944/2019 Author: Niroshanth Tharchanamoorthy Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Australia Submission date 23 May 2019 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/944/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3341/en-US
The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway
The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway CERD/C/67/D/30/2003 Communication number s : 030/2003 Author: The Jewish community of Oslo the Jewish community of Trondheim Rolf Kirchner Julius Paltiel the Norwegian Antiracist Centre and Nadeem Butt Type of JUTBCERD/C/67/D/30/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1740/en-US
The Special Rapporteur on the right to education- Mission to the Seychelles
The Special Rapporteur on the right to education Mission to the Seychelles A/HRC/26/27/ADD.1 NULL 2014 05 05T00:00:00 SR Education United Nations A/HRC/26/27/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 6 May 2014 Original: English Human Rights Council Twenty UHRIA/HRC/26/27/ADD.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/146547a1-8e1f-438c-890d-95188492b020
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Transparency of Party Funding Theme II MKD 2010 03 26 2010 08 30 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 26 March 2010 GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2009-6E-Final-FYROM-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2009-6E-Final-FYROM-PF-PUBLIC
Thomas James Hickey v. Australia
Thomas James Hickey v. Australia CCPR/C/111/D/1995/2010 Communication number s : 1995/2010 Author: Elizabeth Gail Hickey Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Australia Submission date 14 Feb 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1995/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1858/en-US
Tillman v. Australia
Tillman v. Australia CCPR/C/98/D/1635/2007 Communication number s : 1635/2007 Author: Kenneth Davidson Tillman Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Australia Submission date 09 Oct 2007 Date of decision 18 Mar 2010 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1635/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1576/en-US
Timur Ilyasov v. Kazakhstan
Timur Ilyasov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/111/D/2009/2010 Communication number s : 2009/2010 Author: Timur Ilyasov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 21 Jul 2010 Date of decision 23 Jul 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2009/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1861/en-US
Toonen v. Australia
Toonen v. Australia CCPR/C/50/D/488/1992 Communication number s : 488/1992 Author: Nicholas Toonen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Australia Submission date Date of decision 31 Mar 1994 Comment: Individual opinion submitted by JUTBCCPR/C/50/D/488/1992https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/702/en-US
Toregozhina v. Kazakhstan
Toregozhina v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/124/D/2257/2013 Communication number s : 2257/2013 2334/2014 Author: Bakhytzhan Toregozhina Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 07 Nov 2012 Date of decision 15 Oct 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2257/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3096/en-US
U.S. v. Finland
U.S. v. Finland CAT/C/30/D/197/2002 Communication number s : 197/2002 Author: U.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 30 Country Finland Submission date 07 Jan 2002 Date of decision 01 May 2003 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/30/D/197/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/168/en-US
UN Human Rights Recommendations to the Syrian Arab Republic: The Second Cycle of The Universal Periodic Review (2016)
The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights OHCHR for Syria is pleased to provide this compilation of human rights recommendations made to the Syrian Arab Republic in 2016 in the context of the second Universal Periodic Review UPR UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/compilations/un-human-rights-recommendations-syrian-arab-republic-second-cycle-universal
UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW: NEW ZEALAND
UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW: NEW ZEALAND A/HRC/12/8 NULL 2009 06 04T00:00:00 UPR UNITED NATIONS A Distr. GENERAL General Assembly A/HRC/12/8 4 June 2009 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS UHRIA/HRC/12/8https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/fc4a0815-877f-433e-ba6d-a3452774baf8