Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 361 - 380 of 380
Tillman v. Australia
Tillman v. Australia CCPR/C/98/D/1635/2007 Communication number s : 1635/2007 Author: Kenneth Davidson Tillman Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Australia Submission date 09 Oct 2007 Date of decision 18 Mar 2010 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1635/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1576/en-US
UPR Ecuador
UPR Ecuador A/HRC/36/4 NULL 2017 07 10T00:00:00 UPR 117. The recommendations formulated during the interactive dialogue/listed below have been examined by Ecuador and enjoy the support of Ecuador: 117.1 Update and continue implementing the National Plan UHRIA/HRC/36/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/77678adf-0906-49ac-9241-1d024ce883ff
UPR Netherlands
UPR Netherlands A/HRC/36/15 NULL 2017 07 18T00:00:00 UPR 131.1 Ratify the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families Uganda Algeria Bangladesh Egypt Ghana Sudan Guatemala Philippines 131.2 UHRIA/HRC/36/15https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/0d506ff6-e61f-4674-9875-c1dc77ed805c
UPR Trust Funds: achievements, good practices and lessons learned over the past 15 years and optimized support to States in the implementation of recommendations emanating from the fourth cycle
In three cycles since its establishment by the Human Rights Council the UPR has evolved into a unique peer review process to prepare for to undergo and to support a comprehensive and consistently regular check up of the status of human rights in all UN UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/statements/2023/03/upr-trust-funds-achievements-good-practices-and-lessons-learned-over-past-15
UPR UK
UPR UK A/HRC/36/9 NULL 2017 07 14T00:00:00 UPR 134.1 Further consider its position on accepting the right of individual petition to the United Nations beyond the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against UHRIA/HRC/36/9https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/9447ed19-e0b4-4898-beb2-67d42d83b67e
V.W. v. Germany
V.W. v. Germany CRC/C/87/D/75/2019 Communication number s : 075/2019 Author: M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 87 Country Germany Submission date 18 Jan 2019 Date of decision 31 May 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/87/D/75/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2969/en-US
VISIT TO THE BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA :REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF UNILATERAL COERCIVE MEASURES ON THE ENJOYMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, ALENA DOUHAN
VISIT TO THE BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA :REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF UNILATERAL COERCIVE MEASURES ON THE ENJOYMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ALENA DOUHAN A/HRC/48/59/ADD.2 NULL 2021 10 04T00:00:00 SR Unilateral coercive measures UHRIA/HRC/48/59/ADD.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/212fdbe5-aeb1-4e99-9ad3-ad8dbf986fe4
VISIT TO THE PLURINATIONAL STATE OF BOLIVIA - REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT EXPERT ON THE EFFECTS OF FOREIGN DEBT AND OTHER RELATED INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS OF STATES ON THE FULL ENJOYMENT OF ALL HUMAN RIGHTS, PARTICULARLY ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AN
VISIT TO THE PLURINATIONAL STATE OF BOLIVIA REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT EXPERT ON THE EFFECTS OF FOREIGN DEBT AND OTHER RELATED INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS OF STATES ON THE FULL ENJOYMENT OF ALL HUMAN RIGHTS PARTICULARLY ECONOMIC SOCIAL AND CULT UHRIA/HRC/43/45/ADD.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/e1f2733d-2181-4daf-a71c-2758999c80f8
Vidal Martins v. Uruguay
Vidal Martins v. Uruguay CCPR/C/15/D/57/1979 Communication number s : 057/1979 Author: Sophie Vidal Martins Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 15 Country Uruguay Submission date 13 Aug 1979 Date of decision 23 Mar 1982 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/15/D/57/1979https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/560/en-US
Wolf v. Panama
Wolf v. Panama CCPR/C/44/D/289/1988 Communication number s : 289/1988 Author: Dieter Wolf Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 44 Country Panama Submission date 30 Jan 1988 Date of decision 26 Mar 1992 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/44/D/289/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/284/en-US
Wooden v. Mexico
Wooden v. Mexico CAT/C/71/D/759/2016 Communication number s : 759/2016 Author: Ronald James Wooden Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Mexico Submission date 07 Jul 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/759/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3357/en-US
Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent
Report to HRC A/HRC/27/68/Add.1 from 4 December 2013 to 14 December 2013 23 September 2014 Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent Brazil United Nations A/HRC/27/68/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 23 September 2014 Original: English UNSPA/HRC/27/68/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f27%2f68%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent
Report to HRC A/HRC/24/52/Add.2 from 14 January 2013 to 18 January 2013 21 August 2013 Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent Panama United Nations A/HRC/24/52/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General 21 August 2013 English Original: Spanish UNSPA/HRC/24/52/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f24%2f52%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
Report to HRC A/HRC/22/44/Add.2 from 23 January 2012 to 1 February 2012 11 June 2013 Working Group on Arbitrary Detention El Salvador United Nations A/HRC/22/44/Add.2 Distr.: General 11 January 2013 General Assembly English Original: Spanish Human Rights UNSPA/HRC/22/44/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f22%2f44%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2006/56/Add.1 from 5 July 2005 to 13 July 2005 17 January 2006 Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances Colombia UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council E/CN.4/2006/56/Add.1 17 January 2006 Original: UNSPE/CN.4/2006/56/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2006%2f56%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/7/7/Add.4 from 9 July 2007 to 13 July 2007 4 February 2008 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Chile UNITED NATIONS A UNSPA/HRC/7/7/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f7%2f7%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/24/45/Add.1 from 18 February 2013 to 22 February 2013 5 August 2013 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras United UNSPA/HRC/24/45/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f24%2f45%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X et al. v. Slovenia
X et al. v. Slovenia CCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017 Communication number s : 3024/2017 Author: X et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Slovenia Submission date 05 Dec 2013 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3545/en-US
Y.F. v. Panama
Y.F. v. Panama CRC/C/83/D/48/2018 Communication number s : 048/2018 Author: Y.F. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Panama Submission date 21 Jun 2018 Date of decision 03 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/83/D/48/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2630/en-US
Young v. Australia
Young v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/941/2000 Communication number s : 941/2000 Author: Edward Young Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 29 Jun 1999 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Committee members Ruth JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/941/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1076/en-US