Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 61 - 80 of 285
CREDIT AND INDUSTRIAL BANK AND MORAVEC v. the Czech Republic
CREDIT AND INDUSTRIAL BANK AND MORAVEC v. the Czech Republic CZE 21/10/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the impossibility for the company management to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6048
CROATIA BUS D.O.O. v. Croatia
CROATIA BUS D.O.O. v. Croatia HRV 02/06/2022 00:00:00 02/06/2022 14:41:20 Case Description: This case concerns the applicant passenger transport company s lack of access to a court on account of the failure of the Split Administrative Court in 2014 to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60385
CUMHURIYET VAKFI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
CUMHURIYET VAKFI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 08/01/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concern a violation of the applicant company s right to freedom of expression on account of lack of procedural guarantees in interim injunction EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37190
DAMJANOVIC AND EUROMAG D.O.O. v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
DAMJANOVIC AND EUROMAG D.O.O. v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 31/10/2017 00:00:00 03/11/2017 16:53:53 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of administrative proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48061
DANILENKOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
DANILENKOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 10/12/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The State s failure in its positive obligation to ensure effective and clear judicial protection of the applicants against discrimination by their employer a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13577
DARESKIZB LTD v. Armenia
DARESKIZB LTD v. Armenia ARM 08/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: Freedom of expression and functioning of justice: Unjustified interference on account of the publication ban on the applicant company s newspaper as a consequence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58611
DEES v. Hungary
DEES v. Hungary HUN 09/02/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Protection of private life and home: Authorities failure to discharge their positive obligation to put an end to the nuisance caused by intensive traffic circulation and a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10503
DELTA PEKARNY A.S. v. the Czech Republic
DELTA PEKARNY A.S. v. the Czech Republic CZE 02/01/2015 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:15:20 Case Description: Disproportionate interference in the rights of the applicant company due to the search of its property by the competition authorities in 2003 in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39
DI MARCO v. Italy
DI MARCO v. Italy ITA 26/07/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Violation of the right to protection of the applicant s property due to the excessively low compensation awarded to him following the lawful occupation and expropriation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28234
DICHAND AND OTHERS v. Austria
DICHAND AND OTHERS v. Austria AUT 26/05/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the injunction prohibiting the applicant editor and media company from repeating certain critical EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-829
DIGITEL TELEKOM COMPANY DOO AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
DIGITEL TELEKOM COMPANY DOO AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 21/01/2021 00:00:00 15/03/2021 16:05:41 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab. EXEC 77162 company, bih, EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56981
DIMITAR YORDANOV v. Bulgaria
DIMITAR YORDANOV v. Bulgaria BGR 06/12/2018 00:00:00 17/12/2018 15:41:48 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful interference through exposure of the applicant s residential property to daily mine detonations in close proximity in disrespect of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50961
DMD GROUP, A.S. v. Slovakia
DMD GROUP A.S. v. Slovakia SVK 05/01/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of the right to a hearing before a tribunal established by law due to the district court s president s decision EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8145
DMF A.S v. Slovakia
DMF A.S v. Slovakia SVK 05/02/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Excessive length of criminal proceedings to which the applicant company was civil party. Status of Execution: Proceedings are terminated. General measures are covered in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8435
DRAFT - OVA A.S. v. Slovakia
DRAFT OVA A.S. v. Slovakia SVK 09/09/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:46:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns a breach of the right to a fair trial on account of extraordinary appeals lodged by the Prosecutor General and allowed by the Supreme EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7721
DUBUS S.A. v. France
DUBUS S.A. v. France FRA 11/09/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: denial of a fair hearing due to the lack of independence and impartiality of disciplinary proceedings initiated by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33273
EAST WEST ALLIANCE LIMITED v. Ukraine
EAST WEST ALLIANCE LIMITED v. Ukraine UKR 02/06/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of property and lack of a remedy: Unlawful interference due to arbitrary acts of tax authorities against the applicant company resulting in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31133
EDATA-TRANS S.R.L. v. the Republic of Moldova
EDATA TRANS S.R.L. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 17/03/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:43 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to on account of the authorities refusal in 2006 to accept the deduction of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54965
EKO-ELDA AVEE v. Greece
EKO ELDA AVEE v. Greece GRC 09/06/2006 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:29:11 Case Description: Protection of property: Refusal of the tax authorities to pay the applicant company interest in respect of a delay in reimbursing unduly paid tax. Article 1 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-21302
EUROMAK METAL DOO v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
EUROMAK METAL DOO v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 08/10/2018 00:00:00 30/10/2018 16:53:51 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the deprivation of the applicant company of the right to deduct value EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50655