Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 61 - 80 of 87
NOVOSELETSKIY v. Ukraine
NOVOSELETSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 22/05/2005 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:02:34 Case Description: Lacking protection of the right to respect for home private and family life and interference with right to enjoy his possessions: Eviction from a State owned flat which EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26440
OLARU v. the Republic of Moldova
OLARU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/10/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Structural problem highlighted by the Court applying the pilot judgment procedure: violations of the applicants right of access to a court and right to peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7092
OTAVA v. the Czech Republic
OTAVA v. the Czech Republic CZE 27/08/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions: Excessive burden due to deprivation of property acquired in good faith without adequate compensation Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6184
PERO MARIC v. Croatia
PERO MARIC v. Croatia HRV 17/03/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: This case concerns the violation of the applicant s right of peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to the failure of the domestic courts to compensate him in proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59907
PLATAKOU v. Greece
PLATAKOU v. Greece GRC 06/09/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Denial of access to a court erroneous dismissal of an application for compensation for expropriated EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22174
PRAVEDNAYA v. Russia
PRAVEDNAYA v. Russia RUS 30/03/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the quashing of final court decisions delivered in the applicants favour on account of newly discovered circumstances these most often being EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13583
PROJECT-TRADE D.O.O. v. Croatia
PROJECT TRADE D.O.O. v. Croatia HRV 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: This case concerns the unlawful interference with the applicant company s right to peaceful enjoyment of its possessions due to the cancellation and revocation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57449
S.C. CONTINENTAL HOTELS S.A. v. Romania
S.C. CONTINENTAL HOTELS S.A. v. Romania ROU 08/10/2019 00:00:00 14/10/2019 17:04:30 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions of the applicant a privatised company as a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52979
S.C. TOTALGAZ INDUSTRIE S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. TOTALGAZ INDUSTRIE S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 03/12/2019 00:00:00 09/12/2019 17:24:35 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant company s right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to the recalculation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54303
SAVA v. Romania
SAVA v. Romania ROU 16/03/2021 00:00:00 06/04/2021 20:53:01 Case Description: This case concerns an interference with the applicant s right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions due to a 2006 final domestic court decision which maintained a rental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57065
SOCIETATEA ROMANA DE TELEVIZIUNE v. the Republic of Moldova
SOCIETATEA ROMANA DE TELEVIZIUNE v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 15/10/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 11:48:46 Case Description: Freedom of information and protection of property: Friendly settlement with special undertaking: authorities acknowledged the breach EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7626
SOVTRANSAVTO HOLDING v. Ukraine
SOVTRANSAVTO HOLDING v. Ukraine UKR 06/11/2002 00:00:00 07/11/2016 13:25:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Breach of the principle of legal certainty due to the objection protest procedure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-25689
TANASOV v. Romania
TANASOV v. Romania ROU 31/10/2017 00:00:00 12/10/2018 15:40:34 Case Description: This case concerns a disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions on account of the confiscation of two silver ingots EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48093
TETU v. France
TETU v. France FRA 22/12/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 12:11:57 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of compulsory liquidation proceedings thus disproportionate infringement of the right to property on account of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33425
TKACHEVY v. Russia
TKACHEVY v. Russia RUS 14/05/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to enjoyment of possessions on account of the authorities failures related to expropriation of the applicants property Article 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13930
TODOROV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
TODOROV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 13/10/2021 00:00:00 21/05/2022 19:35:01 Case Description: This case concerns a disproportionate interference in 2011 and 2012 with the right to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions of the applicants Todorov and Others EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60335
TRAFIK OIL - 1 EOOD v. Bulgaria
TRAFIK OIL 1 EOOD v. Bulgaria BGR 18/05/2021 00:00:00 21/05/2021 14:55:48 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant company s right to the peaceful enjoyment of its possessions and the absence of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57639
UKRAINE-TYUMEN v. Ukraine
UKRAINE TYUMEN v. Ukraine UKR 22/02/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of property rights and functioning of justice: Arbitrary deprivation of bona fide owners of their possessions in the Ukraine Tuymen case part of the company EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31330
UNSPED PAKET SERVISI SAN. VE TIC. A.S. v. Bulgaria
UNSPED PAKET SERVISI SAN. VE TIC. A.S. v. Bulgaria BGR 13/01/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant company s right to the peaceful enjoyment of its possessions as the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3914
URBARSKA OBEC TRENCIANSKE BISKUPICE v. Slovakia
URBARSKA OBEC TRENCIANSKE BISKUPICE v. Slovakia SVK 02/06/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate deprivation of possessions due to compulsory transfer of the applicant association s land to members of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8081