Everyone has the right to respect for his or her private and family life, home and communications.

    • Text:

      The rights guaranteed in Article 7 correspond to those guaranteed by Article 8 of the ECHR. To take account of developments in technology the word "correspondence" has been replaced by "communications".
      In accordance with Article 52(3), the meaning and scope of this right are the same as those of the corresponding article of the ECHR. Consequently, the limitations which may legitimately be imposed on this right are the same as those allowed by Article 8 of the ECHR:

      "1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.
      2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others."

      Source:
      Official Journal of the European Union C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
      Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
      These explanations were originally prepared under the authority of the Praesidium of the Convention which drafted the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Although they do not as such have the status of law, they are a valuable tool of interpretation intended to clarify the provisions of the Charter.
    • Facebook Ireland Ltd and Others v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Grand Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Information society
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2021:483
    • Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone ; “Académie Fiscale” and Jean Pierre Riquet; “Liga voor Mensenrechten”; “Ligue des Droits de l’Homme”; Patrick Van Assche and others.
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Constitutional Court
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Board of Management of Salesian Secondary College (Limerick)
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      High Court
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • La Quadrature du Net, French Data Network, Igwan.net, Fédération des fournisseurs d'accès à internet associatifs, Free Mobile and Free v. France
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Council of State
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:FR:CEASS:2021:393099.20210421
    • Employee X vs Company Y and the State of Luxembourg
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Court of Cassation
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Employment and social policy
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • M. A. v État belge
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Tenth Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Irregular migration and return
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2021:197
    • A v Migrationsverket
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Fourth Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Asylum and migration
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2021:168
    • Criminal proceedings against H. K.
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Grand Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2021:152
    • Public Prosecutor’s Office of Bolzano and D.G.
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Constitutional Court
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Mr. … and Mrs …. v. Direct Tax Department (anonymised judgment)
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Administrative Court of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):

    0 results found

    0 results found

    0 results found