eu-charter

Cairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh

EU Charter and Charter resources
Previous title

Teideal VII

Forálacha ginearálta

Next title
Previous article

Airteagal 51 - Raon feidhme

Next article

Airteagal 51 - Raon feidhme

1. Tá forálacha na Cairte seo dírithe ar institiúidí, comhlachtaí, oifigí agus gníomhaireachtaí an Aontais le hurraim chuí do phrionsabal na coimhdeachta, agus ar na Ballstáit an tráth a gcuireann siad dlí an Aontais chun feidhme, agus an tráth sin amháin. Dá dheasca sin, tabharfaidh siad aird ar na cearta, déanfaidh siad na prionsabail a urramú agus cuirfidh a gcur i bhfeidhm chun cinn i gcomhréir lena gcumhachtaí faoi seach agus na teorainneacha atá ar chumhachtaí an Aontais mar atá siad tugtha dó sna Conarthaí á n-urramú acu. 2. Ní dhéanann an Chairt seo raon feidhme dhlí an Aontais a fhorleathnú thar chumhachtaí an Aontais ná aon chumhacht ná aon chúram nua a bhunú don Aontas, ná cumhachtaí agus cúraimí atá sainithe sna Conarthaí a mhodhnú..

CHARTERPEDIA RESOURCES

Mínithe

  • Text:

    Is é is aidhm d'Airteagal 51 raon feidhme na Cairte a chinneadh. Féachtar ann lena shuíomh go soiléir gur maidir le hinstitiúidí agus comhlachtaí an Aontais is mó atá feidhm ag an gCairt, de réir phrionsabal na coimhdeachta. Dréachtaíodh an fhoráil seo i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 6(2) den Chonradh ar an Aontas Eorpach, lenar cuireadh de cheangal ar an Aontas cearta bunúsacha a urramú, agus i gcomhréir leis an sainordú arna eisiúint ag Comhairle Eorpach Köln. Tá an téarma `institiúidí` cumhdaithe sna conarthaí. Is minic, sna conarthaí, a úsáidtear an abairt `comhlachtaí, oifigí agus gníomhaireachtaí` chun tagairt a dhéanamh do na heagrais uile arna mbunú leis na conarthaí nó le reachtaíocht thánaisteach (féach, mar shampla, Airteagal 15 nó Airteagal 16 den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh).
    Maidir leis na Ballstáit, eascraíonn sé go glan soiléir as cásdlí na Cúirte Breithiúnais nach bhfuil an ceanglas maidir le cearta bunúsacha a urramú, a shainítear i gcomhthéacs an Aontais, ceangailteach ar na Ballstáit ach amháin nuair a ghníomhaíonn siad laistigh de raon feidhme dhlí an Aontais (breithiúnas an 13 Iúil 1989, Cás 5/88 Wachauf [1989] ECR 2609; breithiúnas an 18 Meitheamh 1991, Cás C-260/89 ERT [1991] ECR I-2925; breithiúnas an 18 Nollaig 1997 (C–309/96 Annibaldi [1997] ECR I–7493). Dhaingnigh an Chúirt Bhreithiúnais an cásdlí seo sna téarmaí seo a leanas: `Fairis sin, ba chóir a mheabhrú go bhfuil na ceanglais a eascraíonn ó chosaint ceart bunúsach i ndlíchóras an Chomhphobail ceangailteach freisin ar na Ballstáit nuair a chuireann siad rialacha Comhphobail chun feidhme ...` (breithiúnas an 13 Aibreán 2000, Cás C-292/97, [2000] ECR I-2737, mír 37 de na forais). Ar ndóigh, tá feidhm ag an riail seo, mar atá sí cumhdaithe sa Bhunreacht, maidir le húdaráis láir agus maidir le comhlachtaí réigiúnacha nó áitiúla, agus maidir le heagraíochtaí poiblí, nuair a chuireann siad chun feidhme dlí an Aontais.
    Daingníonn mír 2, i dteannta an dara habairt de mhír 1, nach bhféadfaidh sé a bheith de thoradh ar an gCairt go leathnaítear na cumhachtaí agus na cúraimí a thugtar don Aontas leis na conarthaí. Luaitear go sonrach anseo iarmhairtí loighciúla phrionsabal na coimhdeachta agus nach bhfuil de chumhachtaí ag an Aontas ach a bhfuil tugtha dó. Níl éifeacht ar bith leis na cearta bunúsacha mar a ráthaítear san Aontais iad seachas i gcomhthéacs na gcumhachtaí a chinntear leis na conarthaí. Dá bhrí sin, is laistigh de theorainneacha na gcumhachtaí céanna sin amháin a eascróidh aon oibleagáid a bheidh ar institiúidí an Aontais, de bhun an dara habairt de mhír 1, prionsabail a leagtar síos sa Chairt a chur chun cinn.
    Daingníonn mír 2 freisin nach bhféadfaidh sé a bheith de thoradh ar an gCairt raon feidhme dhlí an Aontais a leathnú níos faide ná cumhachtaí an Aontais mar atá arna mbunú sna conarthaí. Tá an riail seo bunaithe cheana ag an gCúirt Bhreithiúnais i dtaca leis na cearta bunúsacha a aithnítear mar chuid de dhlí an Aontais (breithiúnas an 17 Feabhra 1998, C–249/96 Grant [1998] ECR I–621, pointe 45 de na forais). I gcomhréir leis an riail seo, ní gá a rá nach féidir an tagairt don Chairt in Airteagal 6 den Chonradh ar an Aontas Eorpach a thuiscint mar ní a leathnaíonn as féin raon gníomhaíochta na mBallstát a mheasfar mar `chur chun feidhme dhlí an Aontais` (de réir bhrí mhír I agus an chásdlí thuasluaite).

    Source:
    Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
    Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
    Ullmhaíodh na mínithe seo i dtosach faoi údarás Praesidium an Choinbhinsiúin a dhréachtaigh an Chairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh. Tugadh suas chun dáta iad faoi chúram Praesidium an Choinbhinsiúin Eorpaigh i bhfianaise na gcoigeartuithe dréachtaithe a rinne an Coinbhinsiún sin ar théacs na Cairte (go háirithe ar Airteagail 51 agus 52) agus i bhfianaise an fhoráis a tháinig ar dhlí an Aontais. Cé nach bhfuil stádas dlí acu iontu féin, is mór is fiú iad mar uirlis léirithe arb é is aidhm di forálacha na Cairte a shoiléiriú.

Cásdlí

National Constitutional Law

4 results found

  • Constitution of the Republic of Croatia
    URL:
    Constitution of the Republic of Croatia
    Tír:
    Croatia
  • De Belgische Grondwet
    URL:
    De Belgische Grondwet
    Tír:
    Belgium

    Artikel 191. Iedere vreemdeling die zich op het grondgebied van België bevindt, geniet de bescherming verleend aan personen en aan goederen, behoudens de bij de wet gestelde uitzonderingen.

  • La Constitution Belge
    URL:
    La Constitution Belge
    Tír:
    Belgium

    Article 191; Tout étranger qui se trouve sur le territoire de la Belgique jouit de la protection accordée aux personnes et aux biens, sauf les exceptions établies par la loi

  • The Belgian Constitution
    URL:
    The Belgian Constitution
    Tír:
    Belgium

    Article 191. All foreigners on Belgian soil benefit from the protection provided to persons andproperty, except for those exceptions provided for by the law.

Dlí an AE

3 results found

Dlí idirnáisiúnta

0 results found

Táirgí

  • Report / Paper / Summary
    4
    November
    2021

    Legal aid for returnees deprived of liberty

    This report outlines to what extent legal aid is available to those held in pre-removal detention in the 27 EU Member States, and in North Macedonia and Serbia, during procedures related to their return. These involve decisions on return, on detention pending removal, the removal itself and on bans on entry. The report also examines when people are entitled to free legal aid and how this aid is funded, as well as who provides representation and various factors that limit the scope of legal aid.
    © Freshideas / Adobestock
  • Report / Paper / Summary
    11
    October
    2021

    Human rights cities in the EU: a framework for reinforcing rights locally

    This report proposes a framework for becoming, and functioning as, a ‘human rights city’ in the EU. It includes ‘foundations’, ‘structures’ and ‘tools’ for mayors, local administrations and grassroots organisations to reinforce fundamental rights locally. It is based on existing good practice and expert input by representatives of human rights cities in the EU, academic experts, international organisations and city networks.
    Creativemarc © adobestock.com, 2021
  • Report / Paper / Summary
    22
    September
    2021

    Protecting civic space in the EU

    Civil society organisations play a vital role in promoting fundamental rights, but they face diverse challenges across the European Union. This report presents FRA’s findings on a range of such challenges. The findings are based on research, and on two online consultations with civil society organisations, carried out in 2020.
    blvdone © adobestock.com, 2021
  • Fundamental Rights Report
    10
    June
    2021

    Fundamental Rights Report 2021

    FRA’s Fundamental Rights Report 2021 reviews major developments in the field in 2020, identifying both achievements and areas of concern. It also presents FRA’s opinions on these developments, including a synopsis of the evidence supporting these opinions. This year’s focus chapter explores the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on fundamental rights. The remaining chapters cover: the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights; equality and non-discrimination; racism, xenophobia and related intolerance; Roma equality and inclusion; asylum, borders and migration; information society, privacy and data protection; rights of the child; access to justice; and the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
  • Opinion / Position Paper
    30
    April
    2021

    Equality in the EU 20 years on from the initial implementation of the equality directives

    This opinion illustrates the extent and nature of lived experiences of inequality and discrimination across the EU. It does so with reference to the grounds of discrimination and areas of life covered by the racial and employment equality directives, as well as in relation to the grounds and areas covered by the proposed Equal Treatment Directive.
    syahrir © adobestock.com, 2021
  • Handbook / Guide / Manual
    17
    December
    2020

    Handbook on European law relating to asylum, borders and immigration - Edition 2020

    The European Convention on Human Rights and European Union law provide an increasingly important framework for the protection of the rights of foreigners. European Union legislation relating to asylum, borders and immigration is developing fast. There is an impressive body of case law by the European Court of Human Rights relating in particular to Articles 3, 5, 8 and 13 of the ECHR. The Court of Justice of the European Union is increasingly asked to pronounce on the interpretation of European Union law provisions in this field. The third edition of this handbook, updated up to July 2020, presents this European Union legislation and the body of case law by the two European courts in an accessible way.
    Jonathan Stutz / Adobe Stock
  • Fundamental Rights Report
    11
    June
    2020

    Ten years on: unlocking the Charter’s full potential

    This focus takes a closer look at the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which has been legally binding for 10 years. At EU level, it has gained visibility and sparked a new fundamental rights culture. At national level, awareness and use of the Charter are limited. Courts increasingly use the Charter, showing the impact of this modern instrument. But its use by governments and parliaments remains low. For instance, there is little indication of anyone regularly scrutinising national legislation that transposes EU law for compatibility with the Charter.
  • Fundamental Rights Report
    11
    June
    2020

    Fundamental Rights Report 2020

    FRA’s Fundamental Rights Report 2020 reviews major developments in the field in 2019, identifying both achievements and areas of concern. It also presents FRA’s opinions on these developments, including a synopsis of the evidence supporting these opinions. This year’s focus chapter explores how to unlock the full potential of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.
  • Report / Paper / Summary
    12
    November
    2019

    The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights on its 10th anniversary: views of civil society and national human rights institutions

    The Charter is most effective, and has a real impact on people’s lives, when parliaments, governments and courts at local, regional and national levels all actively apply it. The national sphere is particularly relevant. A strong fundamental rights architecture and committed national governments and parliaments are key to letting the Charter unfold its potential at this level. Civil society organisations (CSOs) and national human rights institutions (NHRIs) are also crucial given their contributions to the protection and promotion of Charter rights.
  • Report / Paper / Summary
    17
    May
    2018

    Challenges facing civil society organisations working on human rights in the EU – Summary

    Civil society organisations in the European Union play a crucial role in promoting fundamental
    rights, but it has become harder for them do so – due to both legal and practical restrictions.
    This summary outlines the main
    findings and FRA’s opinions on the different
    types and patterns of challenges faced by civil society
    organisations across the EU,