Article 41 - Right to good administration
Article 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
Key facts of the case:
Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market for underground and submarine power cables – Market allocation in connection with projects – Fines – Rights of the defence – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 27(1) – Consistency between the statement of objections and the decision at issue – Access to the file – Single and continuous infringement – Burden of proof – Distortion of arguments and evidence.
Outcome of the case:
On those grounds, the Court (Seventh Chamber) hereby:
255) Further, the right of access to evidence as an application of the general principle of equality of arms pursuant to Articles 41 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union should have at least the same meaning and scope as Article 6(1) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950, as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights.
...
268) Nor is that conclusion called in question by the appellants’ argument that the right of access to evidence, as an application of the general principle of equality of arms provided for in Articles 41 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, should have at least the same meaning and scope as Article 6(1) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR, 16 February 2000, Jasper v. United Kingdom, CE:ECHR:2000:0216JUD002705295).