Skip to main content

Top Menu

  • Om FRA
  • Samarbejde
  • Newsroom
  • Cookies
  • Contact

Select site language

  • Български
  • Čeština
  • Dansk
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • English
  • Español
  • Eesti
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gaeilge
  • Hrvatski
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Lietuvių
  • Latviešu
  • Malti
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Română
  • Slovenčina
  • Slovenščina
  • Svenska

Custom Topbar

Home

Search the FRA website

      • Work on rights
        • Retfærdighed, ofres rettigheder og retligt samarbejde
          • Ofrenes rettigheder
          • Forsvarets rettigheder
          • Civilret
          • Retligt samarbejde og retssamfund
          • Sikkerhed
          • Erhvervslivet og menneskerettigheder
        • Ligestilling, ikkeforskelsbehandling og racisme
          • Børn, unge og ældre
          • Mennesker med handicap
          • Hadforbrydelser
          • Racemæssig eller etnisk baggrund
          • Religion og tro
          • Roma
          • Sex, seksuel orientering og kønsidentitet
        • Asyl, migration og grænser
          • Adgang til asyl
          • Grænser og informationssystemer
          • Beskyttelse af børn
          • Irregulær migration, tilbagesendelse og tilbageholdelse i forbindelse med immigration
          • Regulær migration og integration
          • Ulovlig handel og udnyttelse af arbejdskraften
        • Databeskyttelse, privatlivets fred og ny teknologi
          • Kunstig intelligens og big data
          • Grænser og informationssystemer
          • Databeskyttelse
          • Ulovlig profilering
        • Støtte til menneskerettighedssystemer og -forkæmpere
          • EU's charter om grundlæggende rettigheder
          • Mellemstatslige menneskerettighedssystemer
          • Nationale menneskerettighedssystemer og -organer
          • Civilsamfundet
        • Environmental and social sustainability
          • Climate change and environmental protection
          • Just and green transition
          • Business and human rights
          • Human rights due diligence
          • Consumer protection
      • EU's charter om grundlæggende rettigheder
        • Hvad er grundlæggende rettigheder?
        • What is the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights?
        • Præambel
        • Afsnit I: Værdighed
          • 1 - Den menneskelige værdighed
          • 2 - Ret til livet
          • 3 - Ret til respekt for menneskets integritet
          • 4 - Forbud mod tortur og umenneskelig eller nedværdigende behandling eller straf
          • 5 - Forbud mod slaveri og tvangsarbejde
        • Afsnit II: Friheder
          • 6 - Ret til frihed og sikkerhed
          • 7 - Respekt for privatliv og familieliv
          • 8 - Beskyttelse af personoplysninger
          • 9 - Ret til at indgå ægteskab og ret til at stifte familie
          • 10 - Ret til at tænke frit og til samvittigheds
          • 11 - Ytrings
          • 12 - Forsamlings
          • 13 - Frihed for kunst og videnskab
          • 14 - Ret til uddannelse
          • 15 - Erhvervsfrihed og ret til at arbejde
          • 16 - Frihed til at oprette og drive egen virksomhed
          • 17 - Ejendomsret
          • 18 - Asylret
          • 19 - Beskyttelse i tilfælde af udsendelse, udvisning og udlevering
        • Afsnit III: Ligestilling
          • 20 - Lighed for loven
          • 21 - Ikke-forskelsbehandling
          • 22 - Kulturel, religiøs og sproglig mangfoldighed
          • 23 - Ligestilling mellem kvinder og mænd
          • 24 - Børns rettigheder
          • 25 - Ældres rettigheder
          • 26 - Integration af mennesker med handicap
        • Afsnit IV: Solidaritet
          • 27 - Ret til information og høring af arbejdstagerne i virksomheden
          • 28 - Forhandlingsret og ret til kollektive skridt
          • 29 - Ret til arbejdsformidling
          • 30 - Beskyttelse i tilfælde af ubegrundet opsigelse
          • 31 - Retfærdige og rimelige arbejdsforhold
          • 32 - Forbud mod børnearbejde og beskyttelse af unge på arbejdspladsen
          • 33 - Familieliv og arbejdsliv
          • 34 - Social sikring og social bistand
          • 35 - Sundhedsbeskyttelse
          • 36 - Adgang til tjenesteydelser af almen økonomisk interesse
          • 37 - Miljøbeskyttelse
          • 38 - Forbrugerbeskyttelse
        • Afsnit V: Borgerrettigheder
          • 39 - Stemmeret og valgbarhed til Europa-Parlamentet
          • 40 - Stemmeret og valgbarhed til kommunale valg
          • 41 - Ret til god forvaltning
          • 42 - Ret til aktindsigt
          • 43 - Den Europæiske Ombudsmand
          • 44 - Ret til at indgive andragender
          • 45 - Fri bevægelighed og opholdsret
          • 46 - Diplomatisk og konsulær beskyttelse
        • Afsnit VI: Retfærdighed i retssystemet
          • 47 - Adgang til effektive retsmidler og til en upartisk domstol
          • 48 - Uskyldsformodning og ret til et forsvar
          • 49 - Legalitetsprincippet og princippet om proportionalitet mellem lovovertrædelse og straf
          • 50 - Ret til ikke at blive retsforfulgt eller straffet to gange for samme lovovertrædelse
        • Afsnit VII: Almindelige bestemmelser
          • 51 - Anvendelsesområde
          • 52 - Rækkevidde og fortolkning af rettigheder og principper
          • 53 - Beskyttelsesniveau
          • 54 - Forbud mod misbrug af rettigheder
      • Tools
        • EU Fundamental Rights Information System - EFRIS
        • Criminal detention database
        • Anti-Muslim hatred database
        • National human rights structures navigator
        • Case-law database
        • Charterpedia
        • FRA e-learning platform
        • Data visualisation
        • Equality data collection: promising practices
        • Fighting hate crime: promising practices
      • Produkter
    • About FRA
      • Who we are
        • Structure of FRA
        • Management Board
          • Management Board members
          • Management Board meeting documents
        • Executive Board
        • Scientific Committee
          • Scientific Committee members
        • Director
        • Management team
      • What we do
        • Research and data
        • Capacity-building
        • Advising
        • Convening people
        • FRA for children
          • What are my rights?
          • Where do my rights come from?
        • Areas of work
          • Multi-annual Framework 2007-2022
        • Work Programme
          • Archive
        • Annual Activity report
          • Archive
        • Projects
      • Working at FRA
        • Vacancies and selections
          • Previous vacancies
        • What we offer
        • Work-life balance
        • Application instructions
        • Seconded National Experts
        • Traineeship
        • Study visits at FRA
      • Procurement
        • Ongoing procedures
        • Closed procedures
        • Contracts awarded
      • Finance and budget
        • Financial Rules
        • Financial documents
      • Aktindsigt
        • Access to documents
        • Anmodningen om aktindsigt
      • Data protection within FRA
        • Records registry
    • Cooperation
      • EU-institutionerne og andre -organer
        • European Parliament
        • Council of the European Union
        • European Commission
        • EU agencies
          • Justice and Home Affairs Agencies Network
        • European Committee of the Regions
        • European Economic and Social Committee
        • European Ombudsman
        • EU CRPD Framework
          • Promotion
          • Protection
          • Monitoring
          • Review process
          • Resources
      • EU’s medlemsstater
        • National Liaison Officers
        • National Parliaments
      • Europarådet
      • Civilsamfundet og platformen for grundlæggende rettigheder
        • Activities
        • Civic space
        • Platform library
        • How to register
      • Nationale menneskerettighedsinstitutioner, ligestillingsorganer samt ombudsmandsinstitutioner
      • FN, OSCE og andre internationale organisationer
        • EEA and Norway Grants
      • FRANET
    • Newsroom
      • Media contacts
      • News
      • Press releases
      • Stories
      • Events
        • Past Events
      • FRA products 2025/2026
        • FRA products 2024
        • FRA products 2023
        • FRA products 2022
        • FRA products 2021
        • FRA Products 2020
        • FRA Products 2019
      • Multimedia
        • Videos
        • Infographics
        • Podcasts
      • Speeches
      • Press packs
        • EU LGBTIQ survey - Press pack
        • Fundamental Rights Survey
        • EU LGBTI survey II
        • From institutions to community living for persons with disabilities: perspectives from the ground
        • Second European Union Minorities and Discrimination Survey – Main results
        • Second European Union Minorities and Discrimination Survey (EU-MIDIS II) Muslims
        • Together in the EU: Promoting the participation of migrants and their descendants
        • Second European Union Minorities and Discrimination Survey (EU-MIDIS II) Roma
        • Severe labour exploitation in the EU
        • Child-friendly justice – perspectives and experiences of professionals: Press pack
        • Fundamental rights at EU borders
        • Violence against women press pack
        • Jewish people’s experiences and perceptions of hate crime, discrimination and antisemitism
        • EU LGBT Press pack
        • Child-friendly justice – perspectives and experiences of children
      • Newsletter
    • Account
      • Log in

Main menu

Home
  • Work on rights
    Work on rights
    • Retfærdighed, ofres rettigheder og retligt samarbejde
      • Ofrenes rettigheder
      • Forsvarets rettigheder
      • Civilret
      • Retligt samarbejde og retssamfund
      • Sikkerhed
      • Erhvervslivet og menneskerettigheder
    • Ligestilling, ikkeforskelsbehandling og racisme
      • Børn, unge og ældre
      • Mennesker med handicap
      • Hadforbrydelser
      • Racemæssig eller etnisk baggrund
      • Religion og tro
      • Roma
      • Sex, seksuel orientering og kønsidentitet
    • Asyl, migration og grænser
      • Adgang til asyl
      • Grænser og informationssystemer
      • Beskyttelse af børn
      • Irregulær migration, tilbagesendelse og tilbageholdelse i forbindelse med immigration
      • Regulær migration og integration
      • Ulovlig handel og udnyttelse af arbejdskraften
    • Databeskyttelse, privatlivets fred og ny teknologi
      • Kunstig intelligens og big data
      • Grænser og informationssystemer
      • Databeskyttelse
      • Ulovlig profilering
    • Støtte til menneskerettighedssystemer og -forkæmpere
      • EU's charter om grundlæggende rettigheder
      • Mellemstatslige menneskerettighedssystemer
      • Nationale menneskerettighedssystemer og -organer
      • Civilsamfundet
    • Environmental and social sustainability
      • Climate change and environmental protection
      • Just and green transition
      • Business and human rights
      • Human rights due diligence
      • Consumer protection
  • EU's charter om grundlæggende rettigheder
    EU's charter om grundlæggende rettigheder
    • Hvad er grundlæggende rettigheder?
    • What is the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights?
    • Præambel
    • Afsnit I: Værdighed
      • 1 - Den menneskelige værdighed
      • 2 - Ret til livet
      • 3 - Ret til respekt for menneskets integritet
      • 4 - Forbud mod tortur og umenneskelig eller nedværdigende behandling eller straf
      • 5 - Forbud mod slaveri og tvangsarbejde
    • Afsnit II: Friheder
      • 6 - Ret til frihed og sikkerhed
      • 7 - Respekt for privatliv og familieliv
      • 8 - Beskyttelse af personoplysninger
      • 9 - Ret til at indgå ægteskab og ret til at stifte familie
      • 10 - Ret til at tænke frit og til samvittigheds
      • 11 - Ytrings
      • 12 - Forsamlings
      • 13 - Frihed for kunst og videnskab
      • 14 - Ret til uddannelse
      • 15 - Erhvervsfrihed og ret til at arbejde
      • 16 - Frihed til at oprette og drive egen virksomhed
      • 17 - Ejendomsret
      • 18 - Asylret
      • 19 - Beskyttelse i tilfælde af udsendelse, udvisning og udlevering
    • Afsnit III: Ligestilling
      • 20 - Lighed for loven
      • 21 - Ikke-forskelsbehandling
      • 22 - Kulturel, religiøs og sproglig mangfoldighed
      • 23 - Ligestilling mellem kvinder og mænd
      • 24 - Børns rettigheder
      • 25 - Ældres rettigheder
      • 26 - Integration af mennesker med handicap
    • Afsnit IV: Solidaritet
      • 27 - Ret til information og høring af arbejdstagerne i virksomheden
      • 28 - Forhandlingsret og ret til kollektive skridt
      • 29 - Ret til arbejdsformidling
      • 30 - Beskyttelse i tilfælde af ubegrundet opsigelse
      • 31 - Retfærdige og rimelige arbejdsforhold
      • 32 - Forbud mod børnearbejde og beskyttelse af unge på arbejdspladsen
      • 33 - Familieliv og arbejdsliv
      • 34 - Social sikring og social bistand
      • 35 - Sundhedsbeskyttelse
      • 36 - Adgang til tjenesteydelser af almen økonomisk interesse
      • 37 - Miljøbeskyttelse
      • 38 - Forbrugerbeskyttelse
    • Afsnit V: Borgerrettigheder
      • 39 - Stemmeret og valgbarhed til Europa-Parlamentet
      • 40 - Stemmeret og valgbarhed til kommunale valg
      • 41 - Ret til god forvaltning
      • 42 - Ret til aktindsigt
      • 43 - Den Europæiske Ombudsmand
      • 44 - Ret til at indgive andragender
      • 45 - Fri bevægelighed og opholdsret
      • 46 - Diplomatisk og konsulær beskyttelse
    • Afsnit VI: Retfærdighed i retssystemet
      • 47 - Adgang til effektive retsmidler og til en upartisk domstol
      • 48 - Uskyldsformodning og ret til et forsvar
      • 49 - Legalitetsprincippet og princippet om proportionalitet mellem lovovertrædelse og straf
      • 50 - Ret til ikke at blive retsforfulgt eller straffet to gange for samme lovovertrædelse
    • Afsnit VII: Almindelige bestemmelser
      • 51 - Anvendelsesområde
      • 52 - Rækkevidde og fortolkning af rettigheder og principper
      • 53 - Beskyttelsesniveau
      • 54 - Forbud mod misbrug af rettigheder
  • Tools
    Tools
    • EU Fundamental Rights Information System - EFRIS
    • Criminal detention database
    • Anti-Muslim hatred database
    • National human rights structures navigator
    • Case-law database
    • Charterpedia
    • FRA e-learning platform
    • Data visualisation
    • Equality data collection: promising practices
    • Fighting hate crime: promising practices
  • Produkter

You are here

  • Home
  • Work On Rights
  • Environmental and social sustainability
  • Consumer protection
  • Enforcing consumer rights to combat greenwashing
7
March
2024

Enforcing consumer rights to combat greenwashing

Consumer protection
Justice, victims’ rights and judicial cooperation
Environmental and social sustainability
Tackling greenwashing is an issue where human rights, consumer rights and climate goals align. Companies use greenwashing to convince people to buy products that are not always as environmentally friendly as they claim to be. They mislead consumers and harm the environment. This report shows how a human rights approach can combat greenwashing. It is based on consultations with experts in 10 Member States. The report identifies gaps in existing laws and enforcement. It includes case studies of consumers seeking remedies for misleading environmental claims.
Read news item
  • Read Online
  • Country Research
  • Related
Export to PDF
Search inside this publication
  • Key findings
    • A human rights approach to environmental protection empowers consumers
    • Environmental protection – the advantages and limitations of consumer laws
    • Adopting more precise legal frameworks to ensure uniform interpretation
    • Ensuring effective enforcement of rights
      • Dissuasive sanctions
      • Rules on burden of proof and disclosure of information
    • Enhancing cohesion of the supervisory system
    • Representative action and procedural rights of civil society organisations
    • Significance of awareness-raising
  • Introduction
    • Human rights implications of ‘greenwashing’
    • Legal and policy background
      • EU law on consumer and environmental protection
      • Recent EU developments addressing greenwashing
      • EU commitment to international instruments
      • Due diligence and reporting
    • Methodology
    • Structure
  • 1. Consumers’ right to reliable information and environmental impact
    • 1.1 Combating greenwashing as a misleading commercial practice
      • 1.1.1. Applying rules on misleading practices in cases of greenwashing
      • 1.1.2. Enforcement
    • 1.2. Carbon-neutral and carbon ‘offsetting’ claims
    • 1.3. Combating greenwashing through advertising regulations
      • 1.3.1. Judicial and administrative measures
      • 1.3.2. Non-binding self-regulatory codes
    • 1.4. Labels and certification
    • 1.5. Aarhus Convention provisions relevant to consumer protection
    • 1.6. Due diligence and reporting obligations
  • 2. Legal requirements for enforcing collective consumer and environmental rights
    • 2.1. Collective consumer actions relating to the environment
      • 2.1.1. Enforcement under general consumer law
      • 2.1.2. Environmental claims regulated by specific legislation
      • 2.1.3. Environmental claims dispersed in different laws
    • 2.2. Legal standing in collective actions relating to the environment
    • 2.3. Requirement of harm and possibility of actio popularis
    • 2.4. Burden of proof in collective consumer and environmental claims
  • 3. Ways forward
    • 3.1. Ensuring effective enforcement of rights
    • 3.2. Enhancing cohesion of the supervisory system
    • 3.3. Representative action and procedural rights of civil society organisations
    • 3.4. Training and awareness-raising
    • 3.5. Guidance for business
    • 3.6. Incorporating sustainability into consumer protection policy
    • 3.7 Due diligence and reporting
  • About this publication


Key findings

Human rights and the environment are intrinsically linked: a clean, healthy and sustainable environment is essential to the enjoyment of a range of human rights. Under international human rights treaties and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, governments have an obligation to protect, respect, promote and fulfil all human rights. This includes an obligation to prevent foreseeable harm to rights, such as that presented by climate change. There is growing recognition of these links in international soft law and in regional human rights frameworks.

The key messages on human rights and climate change of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights highlight the human rights obligations of states and the responsibilities of other actors, including businesses, with respect to climate change-related agreements, policies and actions.

Protecting consumer rights and protecting the environment can align in several ways, since both aim to promote sustainable practices and responsible consumption by addressing green marketing, encouraging sustainable consumption and consumer education, and combating ‘greenwashing’.

Greenwashing refers to the practice of conveying false or misleading information about the environmental friendliness of a company’s products. It involves using deceptive advertising or marketing tactics to convince the public that the company’s products, goals and policies are environmentally sound. It can be found in advertising, sponsorship and public messaging in the media, including on social media. Examples of greenwashing can range from simply changing the name or label of a product to make it seem more natural, even if it contains harmful chemicals, to launching elaborate and expensive campaigns that portray highly polluting companies as being eco-friendly.

In today’s dynamic business landscape, companies are faced with growing demands from consumers, governments and investors to embrace sustainability and address climate change. Regrettably, however, some companies seek to capitalise on the increasing demand for environmentally friendly products and use greenwashing to project an image of social responsibility without actually changing their operational practices, thus diverting public attention from the negative impact these may have. Greenwashing therefore results in a range of potential harms to consumers as rights holders, by deceiving and disempowering them through encouraging economic choices that do not in fact advance sustainability goals.

Recognising the potential role of consumers in advancing responses to climate change has led the EU and national legislators to connect consumer and environmental protection in EU legislative and policy initiatives.

The European Green Deal emphasises the importance of empowering consumers to make informed decisions. The 2022 proposal on empowering consumers for the green transition, adopted in February 2024, aims to strengthen consumer rights, in particular by revising the unfair commercial practices directive (UCPD), in order to expressly address greenwashing practices. In addition, a 2023 proposal for a new green claims directive provides more specific rules on substantiation and communication of environmental claims.

The report examines legal frameworks in selected EU Member States (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland and Portugal) to assess whether they ensure consumers’ access to accurate information about the environmental effects of products and services, and whether they hold companies accountable for making misleading green claims (greenwashing). This report presents examples of the application of existing legislation, where available, and points to shortcomings or inconsistencies in its implementation. In addition, the report identifies areas for improvement and proposes solutions to address the gaps in effective protection (see Chapter 3 on ways forward). The findings are relevant for EU and national policymakers, and also for enforcement bodies when implementing provisions targeting misleading environmental claims.


A human rights approach to environmental protection empowers consumers


Adopting a human rights approach to environmental protection and corporate climate accountability requires a focus on the obligations of governments and the responsibilities of large companies, and also on empowering consumers as rights holders. It can help promote sustainable consumption, as it encourages consumers to make choices that are good for both themselves and the environment. Tackling greenwashing is an example of an issue for which human rights, consumer rights and climate goals align.

Furthermore, consumer empowerment depends on access to information and effective access to justice to ensure the enforcement of rights. As demonstrated by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)’s prior research on business and human rights, the presence of procedural obstacles frequently prevents individuals from asserting their rights against corporations, thereby rendering those rights ineffectual. A rights-based approach to environmental protection also aims to increase access to justice not only for individual victims but also for communities. This includes allowing non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to represent communities and protect the environment in the public interest. In July 2022, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution declaring that everyone has the right to a healthy environment. Allowing NGOs to challenge greenwashing without having to prove individual harm is therefore consistent with emerging international law and acknowledges the right of communities to actively participate in shaping policies related to climate change.


Environmental protection – the advantages and limitations of consumer laws

Environmental protection can be improved through more effective protection of consumer rights. Incorporating sustainability into consumer protection policy can promote economic and social development and environmental goals.

Consumer protection laws can empower consumers to make informed decisions and hold businesses accountable for the negative environmental impacts that may result from misleading claims, but their potential may be hindered by lack of awareness and procedural obstacles.

The research suggests that consumer law is more effective than administrative environmental law in addressing greenwashing. This is because consumer law is specifically designed to protect consumers from deceptive advertising, whereas administrative environmental law focuses primarily on regulating environmental impact. Consumer law offers legal protection and advantageous procedural rules to consumers who have been misled by greenwashing claims, and it can result in penalties for companies involved in such practices. In contrast, environmental law may not have the same extent of enforcement measures, and experts did not identify the legal possibility to tackle greenwashing through traditional environmental laws in most countries covered by the research. Furthermore, laws on access to environmental information are primarily directed towards public authorities and not corporations; therefore, their application is limited.

However, the study shows that the existing legal framework on consumer protection in several Member States addresses environmental harm only to a limited extent. Consumer protection laws should explicitly address the environmental impact of products and services in order to improve their effectiveness.


Adopting more precise legal frameworks to ensure uniform interpretation

The research found that relevant legislation applicable to greenwashing in Member States covered by this study is the result of the EU acquis, in particular relating to unfair commercial practices.

The broad definition of commercial practices under the UCPD has made it possible to address greenwashing practices in several Member States, prior to the existence of EU and national legislation explicitly providing definitions of environmental claims.

The research found significant discrepancies between Member States in the application of the provisions on unfair commercial practices to greenwashing, not only with respect to the interpretation of specific terms but also as regards the existence of initiatives to challenge greenwashing at all. In some of the Member States, civil society has initiated a significant number of legal actions, while in others few if any cases have been brought based on these provisions.

Moreover, different approaches have emerged as to how the responsibility for the potentially misleading communication is assigned: courts in some Member States require companies to provide evidence for all aspects of environmental claims, while others find that consumers have a responsibility to research information and seek alternative sources before claiming to have been deceived.

Experts consulted in this research claimed that it is necessary to have more precise legislation at the EU level expressly addressing greenwashing and to provide clear criteria to be met by companies when making any kind of green statement.

The new EU legislative initiatives relating to green claims aim to address these gaps, establishing explicit rules on the admissibility and substantiation of sustainable performance claims.

In addition, the research shows that these proposals have triggered more detailed and targeted legislation in Member States or have already been invoked in successful court litigation. Thus, initiatives at the EU level can drive legislative reforms in Member States and help strengthen laws against greenwashing, even before final adoption.


Ensuring effective enforcement of rights

The enforcement of consumer rights to combat greenwashing may be positively or negatively influenced by a variety of factors, such as dissuasiveness of sanctions, burden of proof and conditions for civil-society representation.


Dissuasive sanctions

Judicial and administrative sanctions can foster prevention, namely by serving as a deterrent against unlawful or abusive behaviour, and redress, namely by providing public and official recognition of the wrongdoing and conveying the message that justice is being served.

Sanctions, such as fines, can be an effective tool to combat greenwashing if they are sufficiently severe to be dissuasive. These can be either administrative fines or damages ordered by courts. Administrative fines are fixed by law, and according to experts are too small to have any significant dissuasive effect and effectively deter large corporations, to which they are typically directed, considering large corporations’ substantial financial resources and potential costs of misleading marketing campaigns.

This issue has been addressed in targeted legislation adopted in some countries, where fines for greenwashing can amount to up to 80 % of the cost of the misleading promotional campaign.

The EU plans to introduce penalties for greenwashing in the proposed green claims directive, including fines, confiscation of revenues and temporary exclusion from public procurement (Article 17). The proposal highlights in recital 64 of the preamble that, ‘when setting penalties and measures for infringements, the Member States should foresee that, based on the gravity of the infringement, the level of fines should effectively deprive the non-compliant trader from the economic benefit derived from using the misleading or unsubstantiated explicit environmental claim or non-compliant environmental labelling scheme, including in cases of repeated infringement’.


Rules on burden of proof and disclosure of information

The research finds that the rules concerning burden of proof can impose an excessive burden on consumers pursuing claims.

According to the UCPD, it is for national law to determine the rules regarding burden of proof, but courts and administrative authorities should have the power to request evidence from businesses to support their claims. In most EU Member States studied, the burden of proof usually rests on the company to prove that their information is correct and complete. However, in some Member States the burden of proof falls on the plaintiff if the lawsuit is based on the seller’s contractual obligations. In all Member States, when damages are claimed, the consumer must prove a link between the unlawful act (such as misleading advertising) and the harm.

As regards disclosure, the corporate sustainability reporting directive (CSRD) introduced significant advancements in the regulations governing the disclosure of social and environmental information by companies. It remains to be seen how this directive will improve access to environmental information for evidence purposes.

Disclosure of information is closely linked to access to information. The EU and its 27 Member States are all parties to the Aarhus Convention, which explicitly guarantees the right to access to environmental information held by public authorities. The findings of this research show, however, that in certain cases this access can be limited by law, for example on grounds relating to protected data, pending legal proceedings, intellectual property rights violations and public security. In addition, third-party information of commercial value may be withheld if it could harm a company’s competitive position. Experts consulted for this research expressed concern that these exceptions are sometimes applied too broadly, blocking access to information, contrary to the spirit and purpose of the Aarhus Convention. Furthermore, the review process for challenging these denials is sometimes ineffective and slow, while the relevance of the information may diminish over time.


Enhancing cohesion of the supervisory system

National authorities in individual countries are responsible for the enforcement of EU consumer protection laws. According to the UCPD, a Member State can decide whether these provisions will be enforced through judicial or administrative proceedings, and whether prior use of other avenues, such as codes of conduct, should be required. The current proliferation of regulations at the national and EU levels, while helpful, makes the legal landscape more complex and fragmented, rendering it potentially less effective or even counterproductive.

The research findings and the experts consulted for this study point to the fragmentation of the current supervisory system regarding issues such as misleading commercial practices or access to environmental information. In addition to instances of shared competence by administrative and judicial bodies, a number of experts highlighted the existence of multiple national authorities responsible for overseeing various consumer rights. This may lead to confusion among consumers about the respective competencies of supervisory bodies.

Furthermore, in some Member States the authorities can refuse to take any action when an alleged infringement is reported, and in some Member States consumers cannot appeal their decisions.


Representative action and procedural rights of civil society organisations


Consumer and environmental protection associations play an important role in empowering rights holders and protecting environmental interests. They do this by promoting transparency and accuracy in environmental marketing, advocating for stronger consumer protection laws, filing complaints on behalf of consumers or in the public interest and raising awareness among consumers. Furthermore, civil-society organisations bring expert knowledge about environmental issues, which judges may not possess, especially in cases where companies use scientific terms to promote their products.

The 2020 representative actions directive (RAD) allows consumers in the EU to protect their collective interests through legal action brought by representative ‘qualified entities’. The RAD distinguishes between domestic and cross-border representative actions, with different criteria for each, and Member States have more flexibility in setting criteria for qualified entities in domestic actions.

The research confirms that the legal standing of NGOs in litigation relating to consumer and environmental rights varies across Member States, which can make judicial procedures against multinational corporations more difficult.

In some Member States, NGOs are allowed to sue even if their rights or legal interests are not affected by the acts or omissions in question, while in other Member States legal action brought by an NGO based on its statutory objectives, such as environmental protection, may be considered inadmissible in litigation based on consumer rights, owing to lack of legal standing for such claims.

Environmental organisations are often barred from pursuing legal action in consumer affairs, where legal standing is reserved for qualified consumer organisations. Furthermore, in certain Member States, only nationally recognised NGOs have legal standing to file a legal action, even though the defendant may be a multinational corporation and the alleged environmental concerns span multiple countries and have been raised throughout the EU.


Significance of awareness-raising


Consumers who are aware of greenwashing practices are more likely to make informed decisions and avoid products that are not environmentally friendly. This can lead to declines in sales and customer loyalty for companies that engage in greenwashing practices. In addition, consumers can alert market surveillance authorities and amplify the impact of awareness-raising campaigns, and also initiate litigation.

However, complaints and the decisions of administrative bodies are often not published, further hindering transparency and educational effect in this regard.

The research finds that raising awareness of greenwashing practices is primarily carried out by civil society organisations who often face significant resource constraints.

Raising awareness among consumers is essential to combat greenwashing practices and ensure that companies are held accountable for their environmental claims. In addition, Member States’ obligation to promote human rights includes ensuring that people are aware of their rights. Raising awareness is therefore another way to protect consumers and the environment through a human rights approach to climate protection.

Introduction

Country Research

05 March 2024

Business and human rights: promoting environmental protection through enforcement of consumer rights

These documents were commissioned under contract as background material for comparative analysis by the FRA for the project ‘Business and human rights: promoting environmental protection through enforcement of consumer rights’. The information and views contained in the documents do not necessarily reflect the views or the official position of the FRA. The documents are made publicly available for transparency and information purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or legal opinion.
Downloads
07 March 2024
Country research - Business and human rights: promoting environmental protection through enforcement of consumer rights - Austria (438.67 KB)
Sprog
English
07 March 2024
Country research - Business and human rights: promoting environmental protection through enforcement of consumer rights - Belgium (582.7 KB)
Sprog
English
07 March 2024
Country research - Business and human rights: promoting environmental protection through enforcement of consumer rights - Bulgaria (585.91 KB)
Sprog
English
07 March 2024
Country research - Business and human rights: promoting environmental protection through enforcement of consumer rights - Denmark (507.88 KB)
Sprog
English
07 March 2024
Country research - Business and human rights: promoting environmental protection through enforcement of consumer rights - France (888.91 KB)
Sprog
English
07 March 2024
Country research - Business and human rights: promoting environmental protection through enforcement of consumer rights - Germany (931.2 KB)
Sprog
English
07 March 2024
Country research - Business and human rights: promoting environmental protection through enforcement of consumer rights - Italy (467.89 KB)
Sprog
English
07 March 2024
Country research - Business and human rights: promoting environmental protection through enforcement of consumer rights - The Netherlands (974.75 KB)
Sprog
English
07 March 2024
Country research - Business and human rights: promoting environmental protection through enforcement of consumer rights - Poland (422.72 KB)
Sprog
English
07 March 2024
Country research - Business and human rights: promoting environmental protection through enforcement of consumer rights - Portugal (504.25 KB)
Sprog
English
Related
Report / Paper / Summary
Environmental and social sustainability
Climate change and environmental protection
15
December
2025

Climate change - ECtHR and CJEU Case-Law

This factsheet outlines key judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) relating to the intersection of climate change and human rights. The issues examined include territorial jurisdiction, standards of protection, standing and victim status, and procedural guarantees in climate-related cases, including the rights of access to information. It is intended to assist legal practitioners, policymakers, and researchers in understanding and applying the evolving human rights jurisprudence in the context of climate change within the European legal space.
Read news item
Four business professionals in a meeting beneath a world map made of sustainability and energy-related words in blue tones.
Rawpixel.com / adobestock.com
Report / Paper / Summary
Human rights due diligence
Equality, non-discrimination and racism
Justice, victims’ rights and judicial cooperation
Environmental and social sustainability
22
October
2025

A Human Rights Approach to Due Diligence: Reflections on key principles

This publication discusses how businesses can meet their human rights and environmental responsibilities. It focuses on key elements of mandatory human rights due diligence and presents reflections on principles from international law and EU law. The paper explains why risk-based human rights due diligence is needed and how it should be implemented. It also highlights the importance of stakeholder engagement, access to remedies, and oversight. It aims to inform EU policymakers and stakeholders about ways to effectively promote responsible business conduct and to ensure adequate protection of rightsholders.
Read news item
Planting a seedling
lovelyday12 / Adobestock
Report / Paper / Summary
Climate change and environmental protection
Business and human rights
Environmental and social sustainability
15
January
2025

Towards a fundamental rights-compliant European Green Deal

Climate change affects the daily lives of everyone in the EU and has significant environmental, economic, social and health impacts. To tackle this, the European Green Deal was adopted in 2019. This report examines the Green Deal from a fundamental rights perspective, with the aim of protecting the right to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment for all. It highlights the lack of fundamental rights in EU climate policy and the need to incorporate these rights into future legislation. It also considers how applying a human-rights-based approach to climate policy could support a fair and inclusive transition.
Read news item
Report / Paper / Summary
National human rights systems and bodies
National human rights systems and bodies
21
January
2021
All language versions now available
16 April 2021

Strong and effective national human rights institutions: challenges, promising practices and opportunities - Summary

National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) are a vital part of the country-level human rights protection system. By raising awareness, providing advice, monitoring and holding authorities to account, they have a central role in navigating the great human rights challenges of our day – tackling both persistent concerns like discrimination and inequality, and novel issues such as the rights implications of artificial intelligence and of the COVID-19 pandemic.
© Freshideas / Adobestock
Report / Paper / Summary
Business and human rights
Justice, victims’ rights and judicial cooperation
Environmental and social sustainability
Business and human rights
6
October
2020

Business and human rights – access to remedy

Business activity affects not just customers, employees, and contractors along supply chains, but often entire communities and the environment. This makes it vital that every business complies with human rights. This comparative report looks at the realities victims face when they seek redress for business-related human rights abuses. It presents the findings of fieldwork research on the views of professionals regarding the different ways people can pursue complaints. The findings highlight that obstacles to achieving justice are often multi-layered.
Read news item
Law scales being held by many hands
freshidea © adobestock.com, 2020
Report / Paper / Summary
National human rights systems and bodies
Support for human rights systems and defenders
3
September
2020
Summary version now available
21 January 2021

Strong and effective national human rights institutions – challenges, promising practices and opportunities

National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) are a vital part of the country-level human rights protection system. This report, published 10 years after FRA’s first in-depth study on NHRIs, looks at such bodies in the EU, as well as the Republic of North Macedonia, the Republic of Serbia, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. It explores relevant developments, challenges to their effectiveness and ways to maximise their impact.
Read news item
Om FRA

Læs mere om agenturet og dets arbejde her.

  • Om FRA
  • EU’s Charter om Grundlæggende Rettigheder
  • Hvor du kan få hjælp
  • Nyt
  • Abonnér på opdateringer
Kontakt
Address
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights
Schwarzenbergplatz 11
A-1040 Vienna, Austria
E-mail
Kontakt os
Newsletter
Abonnér på opdateringer
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Newsletter
  • E-mail
  • RSS

© European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, 2007-2026

  • About this website
  • Legal notice
  • Cookies
  • Data Protection
  • Accessibility