eu-charter

Cairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh

Airteagal 7 - Meas ar an saol príobháideach agus ar shaol an teaghlaigh

Airteagal 7 - Meas ar an saol príobháideach agus ar shaol an teaghlaigh

Tá ag gach duine an ceart go ndéanfar a shaol nó a saol príobháideach agus a shaol nó a saol teaghlaigh, a chónaí nó a cónaí agus a chumarsáidí nó a cumarsáidí a urramú.

  • Text:

    Freagraíonn na cearta a ráthaítear in Airteagal 7 do na cearta a ráthaítear in Airteagal 8 den CECD. Chun forbairtí sa teicneolaíocht a chur san áireamh, tá an focal `cumarsáid` curtha isteach in ionad an fhocail `comhfhreagras`.
    I gcomhréir le hAirteagal 52(3) is ionann brí agus raon feidhme dó agus don Airteagal comhfhreagrach sa CECD. Dá dheasca sin, is ionann na teorainneacha a fhéadfar a fhorchur go dlisteanach leis an gceart seo agus na teorainneacha a cheadaítear le hAirteagal 8 den CECD:
    `1. Tá ag gach uile dhuine an ceart chun go mba slán dó a shaol príobháideach agus saol a theaghlaigh, a ionad cónaithe agus a chomhfhreagras.
    2. Ní chuirfidh aon údarás poiblí isteach ar fheidhmiú an chirt seo, ach sa mhéid go mbeidh sin de réir an dlí agus riachtanach i ndaonlathas ar mhaithe leis an tslándáil náisiúnta, le sábháilteacht an phobail nó le leas eacnamaíoch na tíre, chun anord nó coiriúlacht a chosc, chun sláinte nó moráltacht a chosaint nó chun cearta agus saoirsí daoine eile a chosaint.`

    Source:
    Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
    Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
    Ullmhaíodh na mínithe seo i dtosach faoi údarás Praesidium an Choinbhinsiúin a dhréachtaigh an Chairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh. Tugadh suas chun dáta iad faoi chúram Praesidium an Choinbhinsiúin Eorpaigh i bhfianaise na gcoigeartuithe dréachtaithe a rinne an Coinbhinsiún sin ar théacs na Cairte (go háirithe ar Airteagail 51 agus 52) agus i bhfianaise an fhoráis a tháinig ar dhlí an Aontais. Cé nach bhfuil stádas dlí acu iontu féin, is mór is fiú iad mar uirlis léirithe arb é is aidhm di forálacha na Cairte a shoiléiriú.
  • Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Asylgerichtshofs
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Opinion of Advocate General
    Type:
    Opinion
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Yoshikazu Iida v Stadt Ulm
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Advocate General
    Type:
    Opinion
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2012:296
  • Secretary of State for the Home Department v Muhammad Sazzadur Rahman, Fazly Rabby Islam, Mohibullah Rahman
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Opinion of Advocate General
    Type:
    Opinion
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Commission v Austria
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Murat Dereci and Others v Bundesministerium für Inneres
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Advocate General
    Type:
    Opinion
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2011:626
  • Asociación Nacional de Establecimientos Financieros de Crédito (ASNEF), Federación de Comercio Electrónico y Marketing Directo (FECEMD) v Administración del Estado
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    European Court of Justice (Third Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Murat Deveci and Others v Bundesministerium für Inneres
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Grand Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Criminal proceedings against Magatte Gueye (C-483/09) and Valentín Salmerón Sánchez (C-1/10).
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Fourth Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2011:583
  • Malgožata Runevič-Vardyn, Łukasz Paweł Wardyn v Vilniaus miesto savivaldybės administracija, Lietuvos Respublikos teisingumo ministerija, Valstybinė lietuvių kalbos komisija, Vilniaus miesto savivaldybės administracijos Teisės departamento Civilinės metrikacijos skyrius
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Second Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2011:291
  • Criminal proceedings against Magatte Gueye (C-483/09) and Valentín Salmerón Sánchez (C-1/10
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Advocate General
    Type:
    Opinion
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2011:297

0 results found

0 results found

0 results found