eu-charter

Cairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh

Airteagal 3 - An ceart chun iomláine an duine

Airteagal 3 - An ceart chun iomláine an duine

1. Tá ag gach duine an ceart go dtabharfar meas ar a iomláine nó ar a hiomláine choirp agus mheabhrach.

2. I réimsí na míochaine agus na bitheolaíochta, ní mór na nithe seo a leanas go háirithe a urramú:

(a) toiliú saor feasach an duine i dtrácht, de réir na nósanna imeachta atá leagtha síos le dlí;

(b) toirmeasc ar chleachtais dea-ghinice, go háirithe na cleachtais sin arb é is aidhm dóibh daoine a roghnú;

(c) toirmeasc ar fhoinse bhrabúis a dhéanamh den chorp daonna agus de bhaill den chorp, ina gcáil mar chorp agus mar bhaill den chorp;

(d) toirmeasc ar chlónáil atáirgeach daoine..

    • Text:

      1. Sa bhreithiúnas a thug sí an 9 Deireadh Fómhair 2001 i gCás C–377/98 an Ísiltír v. Parlaimint na hEorpa agus an Chomhairle 2001 ECR I-7079, forais Uimh. 70, 78 – 80, dhaingnigh an Chúirt Bhreithiúnais gur cuid de dhlí an Aontais ceart bunúsach an duine chun a iomláine agus go gcuimsíonn sé, i gcomhthéacs na míochaine agus na bitheolaíochta, saorthoiliú feasach an deontóra agus an fhaighteora.
      2. Tá prionsabail Airteagal 3 den Chairt san áireamh cheana féin sa Choinbhinsiún um Chearta an Duine agus an Bhithmhíochaine, arna ghlacadh ag Comhairle na hEorpa (ETS 164 agus prótacal breise ETS 168). Níl sé d'aidhm ag an gCairt imeacht ó na prionsabail sin agus ní thoirmisctear dá bhrí sin ach an chlónáil atáirgeach. Ní údaraítear ná ní thoirmisctear foirmeacha eile clónála. Ní choisceann sí mar sin, beag ná mór, ar an reachtas saghsanna eile clónála a thoirmeasc.
      3. An tagairt do chleachtais dea-ghinice, go háirithe na cleachtais sin arb é is aidhm dóibh daoine a roghnú, baineann sí leis na hócáidí sin a d'fhéadfadh a bheith ann ina ndéantar cláir roghnaithe a eagrú agus a chur chun feidhme, a chuimsíonn feachtais aimridithe, an toircheas éigeantach, cleamhnais eitneacha éigeantacha, gan ach iad a lua; gníomhartha iad uile a meastar gur cionta idirnáisiúnta iad i Reacht na Cúirte Coiriúla Idirnáisiúnta arna ghlacadh sa Róimh an 17 Iúil 1998 (féach Airteagal 7(1)(g) de).

      Source:
      Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
      Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
      Ullmhaíodh na mínithe seo i dtosach faoi údarás Praesidium an Choinbhinsiúin a dhréachtaigh an Chairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh. Tugadh suas chun dáta iad faoi chúram Praesidium an Choinbhinsiúin Eorpaigh i bhfianaise na gcoigeartuithe dréachtaithe a rinne an Coinbhinsiún sin ar théacs na Cairte (go háirithe ar Airteagail 51 agus 52) agus i bhfianaise an fhoráis a tháinig ar dhlí an Aontais. Cé nach bhfuil stádas dlí acu iontu féin, is mór is fiú iad mar uirlis léirithe arb é is aidhm di forálacha na Cairte a shoiléiriú.
    • La Quadrature du Net and Others v Premier ministre and Others
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Grand Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Information society
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2020:791
    • Anonymous plaintiff v. Higher Regional Court Celle (Oberlandesgericht Celle)
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Federal Constitutional Court
      Type:
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2019:rs20191106.1bvr027617
    • Third country national v. Secretary of State of Justice and Security
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Council of State
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:NL:RVS:2018:1802
    • Request for an abstract review of constitutionality made by a Group of Members of the Parliament.
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Constitutional Court
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Defendant with foreign nationality and public prosecutor representing the State
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Front populaire pour la libération de la saguia-el-hamra et du rio de oro (Front Polisario) v Council of the European Union
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      General Court (Eight Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      External relations
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:T:2015:953
    • Parrillo v. Italy
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      European Court of Human Rights
      Deciding body:
      Court (Grand Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0827JUD004647011
    • Jane Agius v Attorney General, Minister for Home Affairs and National Security, Prime Minister
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Centre public d’action sociale d’Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve v Moussa Abdida
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Advocate General Bot
      Type:
      Opinion
      Policy area:
      Asylum and migration
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2014:2167
    • A, B and C
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Advocate General Sharpston
      Type:
      Opinion
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):

    42 results found

    • Latvijas Republikas Satversme
      Tír:
      Latvia

      94. Ikvienam ir tiesības uz brīvību un personas neaizskaramību. 

    • Latvijas Republikas Satversme
      Tír:

      94. Ikvienam ir tiesības uz brīvību un personas neaizskaramību. (..)

    • Constitution of the Italian Republic
      Tír:
      Italy

      Art. 32. (...) No one may be obliged to undergo any health treatment except under the provisions of the law. The law may not under any circumstances violate the limits imposed by respect for the human person.

    • Costituzione della Repubblica Italiana
      Tír:
      Italy

       Art. 32. (...) Nessuno può essere obbligato a un determinato trattamento sanitario se non per disposizione di legge. La legge non può in nessun caso violare i limiti imposti dal rispetto della persona umana. 

    • Constitution of Ireland
      Tír:
      Ireland

      Article 40.3(...) The State shall, in particular, by its laws protect as best it may from unjust attack and, in the case of injustice done, vindicate the life, person, good name, and property rights of every citizen.(...)

    • Magyarország Alaptörvénye
      Tír:
      Hungary

      II. cikk (SZABADSÁG ÉS FELELŐSSÉG) Az emberi méltóság sérthetetlen. Minden embernek joga van az élethez és az emberi méltósághoz [...] III. cikk (SZABADSÁG ÉS FELELŐSSÉG)(1) [...] Tilos az emberkereskedelem. (2) Tilos emberen tájékoztatáson alapuló, önkéntes hozzájárulása nélkül orvosi vagy tudományos kísérletet végezni. (3) Tilos az emberi fajnemesítést célzó gyakorlat, az emberi test és testrészek haszonszerzési célú felhasználása, valamint az emberi egyedmásolás.

    • The Fundamental Law of Hungary
      Tír:
      Hungary

      Article II (Freedom and Responsibility) Human dignity shall be inviolable. Every human being shall have the right to life and human dignity [...] Article III (Freedom and Responsibility) (1) [...] Trafficking in human beings shall be prohibited. (2) It shall be prohibited to perform medical or scientific experiment on human beings without their informed and voluntary consent. (3) Practices aimed at eugenics and the use of the human body or its parts for financial gain, as well as human cloning shall be prohibited.

    • Constitution of the Hellenic Republic
      Tír:
      Greece

      Article 5 (2)All persons living within the Greek territory shall enjoy full protection of their life, honour and liberty irrespective of nationality, race or language and of religious or political beliefs. Exceptions shall be permitted only in cases provided by international law [...]

    • Το Σύνταγμα της Ελλάδας
      Tír:
      Greece

      Άρθρο 5(2). Όλoι όσoι βρίσκoνται στην Eλληνική Eπικράτεια απoλαμβάνoυν την απόλυτη πρoστασία της ζωής, της τιμής και της ελευθερίας τoυς, χωρίς διάκριση εθνικότητας, φυλής, γλώσσας και θρησκευτικών ή πoλιτικών πεπoιθήσεων. Eξαιρέσεις επιτρέπoνται στις περιπτώσεις πoυ πρoβλέπει τo διεθνές δίκαιo [...]

    • Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany
      Tír:
      Germany

      Article 2 (1) Every person shall have the right to free development of his personality insofar as he does not violate the rights of others or offend against the constitutional order or the moral law. (2) Every person shall have the right to life and physical integrity. Freedom of the person shall be inviolable. These rights may be interfered with only pursuant to a law. Article 104 (1) Liberty of the person may be restricted only pursuant to a formal law and only in compliance with the procedures prescribed therein. Persons in custody may not be subjected to mental or physical mistreatment. (...)

    • Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland
      Tír:
      Germany

      Artikel 2(1) Jeder hat das Recht auf die freie Entfaltung seiner Persönlichkeit, soweit er nicht die Rechte anderer verletzt und nicht gegen die verfassungsmäßige Ordnung oder das Sittengesetz verstößt. (2) Jeder hat das Recht auf Leben und körperliche Unversehrtheit. Die Freiheit der Person ist unverletzlich. In diese Rechte darf nur auf Grund eines Gesetzes eingegriffen werden. Artikel 104 (1) Die Freiheit der Person kann nur auf Grund eines förmlichen Gesetzes und nur unter Beachtung der darin vorgeschriebenen Formen beschränkt werden. Festgehaltene Personen dürfen weder seelisch noch körperlich mißhandelt werden. (...)

    • Constitution of Finland
      Tír:
      Finland

      Section 7 Right to life, personal liberty and integrity Everyone has the right to life, personal liberty, integrity and security. No one shall be sentenced to death, tortured or otherwise treated in a manner violating human dignity. The personal integrity of the individual shall not be violated, nor shall anyone be deprived of liberty arbitrarily or without a reason prescribed by an Act. A penalty involving deprivation of liberty may be imposed only by a court of law. (...)

    • Suomen perustuslaki
      Tír:
      Finland

      7 § Oikeus elämään sekä henkilökohtaiseen vapauteen ja koskemattomuuteen Jokaisella on oikeus elämään sekä henkilökohtaiseen vapauteen, koskemattomuuteen ja turvallisuuteen. Ketään ei saa tuomita kuolemaan, kiduttaa eikä muutoinkaan kohdella ihmisarvoa loukkaavasti. Henkilökohtaiseen koskemattomuuteen ei saa puuttua eikä vapautta riistää mielivaltaisesti eikä ilman laissa säädettyä perustetta. Rangaistuksen, joka sisältää vapaudenmenetyksen, määrää tuomioistuin. (...)

    • Constitution of the Republic of Estonia
      Tír:
      Estonia

      Article 18. (…) No one may be subjected to medical or scientific experiments against his or her free will.

    • Eesti Vabariigi Põhiseadus
      Tír:
      Estonia

      § 18. (…) Kedagi ei tohi tema vaba tahte vastaselt allutada meditsiini- ega teaduskatsetele.

    • The Constitution of the Republic of Cyprus
      Tír:
      Cyprus

      Article 7
      1. Every person has the right to life and corporal integrity.
      2. [Deleted]
      3. Deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention of this Article when it results from the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary -
      (a) in defence of person or property against the infliction of aproportionate and otherwise unavoidable and irreparable evil;
      (b) in order to effect an arrest or to prevent the escape of a person lawfully detained;
      (c) in action taken for the purpose of quelling a riot or insurrection.

    • Tο Σύνταγμα της Κυπριακής Δημοκρατίας
      Tír:
      Cyprus

      ΑΡΘΡΟΝ 7
      1. Έκαστος έχει το δικαίωμα ζωής και σωματικής ακεραιότητος.
      2. [Διαγράφηκε].
      3. Η αποστέρησης της ζωής δεν θεωρείται παράβασις του παρόντος άρθρου, οσάκις προέρχεται εκ της χρήσεως της απολύτως αναγκαίας βίας, ότε και όπως ο νόμος ορίζη:
      (α) επί αμύνης προσώπου ή περιουσίας προς αποτροπήν αναλόγου και άλλως αναποτρέπτου και ανεπανορθώτου κακού,
      (β) προς διενέργειαν συλλήψεως ή προς παρεμπόδισιν αποδράσεως προσώπου νομίμως κρατουμένου,
      (γ) επί πράξεως γενομένης προς σκοπόν καταστολής ταραχών ή στάσεως.

    • Constitution of the Republic of Bulgaria
      Tír:
      Bulgaria

       Article 29 [...] (2) No one shall be subjected to medical, scientific or other experimentation without his voluntary written consent.Article 52 [...] (4) No one shall be subjected to forcible medical treatment or sanitary measures except in circumstances established by law.

    • КОНСТИТУЦИЯ на Република България
      Tír:
      Bulgaria

      Чл. 29. [...] (2) Никой не може да бъде подлаган на медицински, научни или други опити без неговото доброволно писмено съгласие.Чл. 52. [...] (4) Никой не може да бъде подлаган принудително на лечение и на санитарни мерки освен в предвидените от закона случаи.

    • De Belgische Grondwet
      Tír:
      Belgium

      Art. 22bis(tweede wijziging)

      Elk kind heeft recht op eerbiediging van zijn morele, lichamelijke, geestelijke en seksuele integriteit. (....)