eu-charter

Cairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh

Previous title

Teideal I

Dínit

Next title
Previous article

Airteagal 1 - Dínit an duine

Next article

Airteagal 1 - Dínit an duine

Tá dínit an duine dosháraithe. Ní mór an dínit sin a urramú agus a chosaint..

  • Text:

    Ceart bunúsach ann féin is ea dínit an duine; ní hé amháin sin ach is í is bonn, dáiríre, do na cearta bunúsacha. Rinneadh dínit an duine a chumhdach i 1948 i mbrollach an Dearbhaithe Uilechoitinn um Chearta an Duine: `... de bhrí go bhfuil aitheantas ar an dínit inghreamaithe agus ar na cearta comhionanna dosháraithe atá ag gach duine sa teaghlach daonna mar bhunús leis an tsaoirse, leis an gceartas agus leis an tsíocháin sa chruinne`. Sa bhreithiúnas a thug sí an 9 Deireadh Fómhair 2001 i gcás C–377/98 an Ísiltír v. Parlaimint na hEorpa agus an Chomhairle, 2001 ECR I-7079, i bhforais Uimh. 70 – 77, dhaingnigh an Chúirt Bhreithiúnais gur cuid de dhlí an Aontais ceart bunúsach an duine chun a dhínite.
    Fágann sin nach féidir úsáid a bhaint as aon cheann de na cearta a leagtar síos sa Chairt seo chun dochar a dhéanamh do dhínit duine eile, agus gur cuid de shubstaint na gceart a leagtar síos sa Chairt seo í dínit an duine. Ní mór, dá bhrí sin, í a urramú, fiú amháin agus srian á chur ar cheart.

    Source:
    Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
    Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
    Ullmhaíodh na mínithe seo i dtosach faoi údarás Praesidium an Choinbhinsiúin a dhréachtaigh an Chairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh. Tugadh suas chun dáta iad faoi chúram Praesidium an Choinbhinsiúin Eorpaigh i bhfianaise na gcoigeartuithe dréachtaithe a rinne an Coinbhinsiún sin ar théacs na Cairte (go háirithe ar Airteagail 51 agus 52) agus i bhfianaise an fhoráis a tháinig ar dhlí an Aontais. Cé nach bhfuil stádas dlí acu iontu féin, is mór is fiú iad mar uirlis léirithe arb é is aidhm di forálacha na Cairte a shoiléiriú.
  • CJEU Case C-473/16 / Judgment
    F v Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal.
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Third Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Asylum and migration
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2018:36
  • Hungary / Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal / 5.Beuf.10.142/2018 (EBD2018.B.23.)
    Defendant with foreign nationality and public prosecutor representing the State
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • CJEU Case C-473/16 / Opinion
    F v Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Advocate General
    Type:
    Opinion
    Policy area:
    Asylum and migration
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2017:739
  • Croatia / Constitutional Court / U-III-1095/2014
    Paolo Biasiol from Rijeka v Leopold Kesten from Rijeka and Getro Plc.
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Constitutional Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • CJEU Case T-531/14 / Judgment
    Leïmonia Sotiropoulou and Others v Council of the European Union
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    General Court (Second Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Employment and social policy
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:T:2017:297
  • Croatia / Constitutional Court / U-I-60/1991
    Applicants: Nike Karabaić, Antun Lisec from Vetovo, Hrvatski pokret za život i obitelj, Hrvatski katolički zbor "MI", Stjepan Herceg, U ime obitelji association, Saša Čajić and Daniel Majer
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Constitutional Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Public Health
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Bulgaria / Supreme Administrative Court / 10383/2015
    The Commission for the Protection against Discrimination (CPD) v the director of an elementary school in the town of R
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Supreme Administrative Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • France / Court of cassation / 15-18958
    M. X. v la Caisse des dépôts et consignations
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Court of cassation
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Employment and social policy
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • CJEU - Joined Cases C-404/15 and C-659/15 PPU / Judgment
    Pál Aranyosi and Robert Căldăraru v Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Bremen
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Grand Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2016:198
  • Poland / Regional Court / IV U 1470/12
    R.P. v Director of the Pension Department in the Ministry of the Interior
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Regional Court in Częstochowa
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):

0 results found

0 results found

0 results found