eu-charter

Cairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh

Airteagal 24 - Cearta an linbh

Airteagal 24 - Cearta an linbh

1. Beidh ag leanaí an ceart chun cibé cosaint agus cúram is gá ar mhaithe lena ndea-bhail. Féadfaidh siad a dtuairimí a nochtadh go saorálach. Cuirfear na tuairimí sin san áireamh i dtaca le hábhair a bhaineann leo i gcomhréir lena n-aois agus lena n-aibíocht.
2. I ngach gníomh a bhaineann le leanaí, bíodh sé á ghlacadh ag údaráis phoiblí nó ag institiúidí príobháideacha, ní mór leas an linbh a bheith ar na dálaí is tábhachtaí atá le cur san áireamh.
3. Beidh ag gach leanbh an ceart chun caidreamh pearsanta agus teagmháil dhíreach a bheith aige nó aici go tráthrialta lena bheirt nó lena beirt thuismitheoirí mura rud é go bhfuil sé sin contrártha le leasanna an linbh.

    • Text:

      Tá an tAirteagal seo bunaithe ar Choinbhinsiún Nua-Eabhrac um Chearta an Linbh, a síníodh an 20 Samhain 1989 agus atá daingnithe ag na Ballstáit uile, agus go háirithe ar Airteagail 3, 9, 12 agus 13 de.

      Cuirtear san áireamh i mír 3 go bhféadfadh sé, mar chuid de bhunú limistéir shaoirse, shlándála agus cheartais, go n-áireofaí i reachtaíocht an Aontais maidir le hábhair shibhialta a bhfuil impleachtaí trasteorann acu, a dtugann Airteagal 81 den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh cumhachtaí ina leith, cearta cuairte lena gcinntítear go bhféadfaidh leanaí teagmháil phearsanta, dhíreach a bheith acu ar bhonn rialta lena mbeirt tuismitheoirí.

      Source:
      Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
      Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
      Ullmhaíodh na mínithe seo i dtosach faoi údarás Praesidium an Choinbhinsiúin a dhréachtaigh an Chairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh. Tugadh suas chun dáta iad faoi chúram Praesidium an Choinbhinsiúin Eorpaigh i bhfianaise na gcoigeartuithe dréachtaithe a rinne an Coinbhinsiún sin ar théacs na Cairte (go háirithe ar Airteagail 51 agus 52) agus i bhfianaise an fhoráis a tháinig ar dhlí an Aontais. Cé nach bhfuil stádas dlí acu iontu féin, is mór is fiú iad mar uirlis léirithe arb é is aidhm di forálacha na Cairte a shoiléiriú.
    • M. A. v État belge
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Tenth Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Irregular migration and return
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2021:197
    • A v Migrationsverket
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Fourth Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Asylum and migration
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2021:168
    • TQ v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (First Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Irregular migration and return
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2021:9
    • B. M. M. and Others v État belge
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Third Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2020:577
    • Michnea v. Romania
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      European Court of Human Rights
      Deciding body:
      Court (Fourth Section)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Education, training, youth, sport
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0707JUD001039519
    • Voica v. Romania
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      European Court of Human Rights
      Deciding body:
      Court (Fourth Section)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Education, training, youth, sport
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Mr. … v. State of Luxembourg (anonymised judgment)
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Higher Administrative Court of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • A and S v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Second Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2018:248
    • B. M. M. and Others v État belge
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Advocate General
      Type:
      Opinion
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2020:222
    • Abdurahman Mohamed, alias Armiyas Tofer vs. Belgian State
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Council of State
      Type:
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):

    0 results found

    0 results found

    0 results found