Skip to main content

Top Menu

  • Az FRA-ról
  • Együttműködés
  • Newsroom
  • Cookies
  • Contact

Select site language

  • Български
  • Čeština
  • Dansk
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • English
  • Español
  • Eesti
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gaeilge
  • Hrvatski
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Lietuvių
  • Latviešu
  • Malti
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Română
  • Slovenčina
  • Slovenščina
  • Svenska

Custom Topbar

Home

Search the FRA website

      • Work on rights
        • Igazságszolgáltatás, a sértettek jogai és igazságügyi együttműködés
          • Bűncselekmények áldozatainak jogai
          • Vádlottak jogai
          • Polgári igazságszolgáltatás
          • Igazságügyi együttműködés és jogállamiság
          • Biztonság
          • Üzleti tevékenység és emberi jogok
        • Egyenlőség, megkülönböztetésmentesség és rasszizmus
          • Gyermekek, fiatalok és idősebbek
          • Fogyatékossággal élők
          • Gyűlölet-bűncselekmények
          • Faji és etnikai származás
          • Vallás és meggyőződés
          • Romák
          • Nem, szexuális irányultság és társadalmi nem
        • Menedékjog, migráció és határok
          • A menekültügyi eljárásokhoz való hozzáférés
          • Határok és információs rendszerek
          • Gyermekvédelem
          • Irreguláris migráció, visszaküldés és idegenrendészeti őrizet
          • Legális migráció és integráció
          • Emberkereskedelem és munkaerő-kizsákmányolás
        • Adatvédelem, magánélet és új technológiák
          • Mesterséges intelligencia és nagy adathalmazok
          • Határok és információs rendszerek
          • Adatvédelem
          • Jogellenes profilalkotás
        • Az emberi jogi rendszerek és jogvédők támogatása
          • Az Európai Unió Alapjogi Chartája
          • Kormányközi emberi jogi rendszerek
          • Nemzeti emberi jogi rendszerek és szervek
          • Civil társadalom
        • Environmental and social sustainability
          • Climate change and environmental protection
          • Just and green transition
          • Business and human rights
          • Human rights due diligence
          • Consumer protection
      • Az EU Alapjogi Chartája
        • Mik azok az alapvető jogok?
        • What is the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights?
        • Preambulum
        • I. Cím: Méltóság
          • 1 - Az emberi méltóság
          • 2 - Az élethez való jog
          • 3 - A személyi sérthetetlenséghez való jog
          • 4 - A kínzás és az embertelen vagy megalázó bánásmód és büntetés tilalma
          • 5 - A rabszolgaság és a kényszermunka tilalma
        • II. Cím: Szabadságok
          • 6 - A szabadsághoz és biztonsághoz való jog
          • 7 - A magán
          • 8 - A személyes adatok védelme
          • 9 - A házasságkötéshez és a családalapításhoz való jog
          • 10 - A gondolat-, a lelkiismeret
          • 11 - A véleménynyilvánítás és a tájékozódás szabadsága
          • 12 - A gyülekezés és az egyesülés szabadsága
          • 13 - A művészet és a tudomány szabadsága
          • 14 - Az oktatáshoz való jog
          • 15 - A foglalkozás megválasztásának szabadsága és a munkavállaláshoz való jog
          • 16 - A vállalkozás szabadsága
          • 17 - A tulajdonhoz való jog
          • 18 - A menedékjog
          • 19 - Védelem a kitoloncolással, a kiutasítással és a kiadatással szemben
        • III. Cím: Egyenlőség
          • 20 - A törvény előtti egyenlőség
          • 21 - A megkülönböztetés tilalma
          • 22 - A kulturális, vallási és nyelvi sokféleség
          • 23 - A nők és férfiak közötti egyenlőség
          • 24 - A gyermekek jogai
          • 25 - Az idősek jogai
          • 26 - A fogyatékkal élő személyek beilleszkedése
        • IV. Cím: Szolidaritás
          • 27 - A munkavállalók joga a vállalkozásnál a tájékoztatáshoz és konzultációhoz
          • 28 - A kollektív tárgyaláshoz és fellépéshez való jog
          • 29 - A munkaközvetítői szolgáltatások igénybevételéhez való jog
          • 30 - Az indokolatlan elbocsátással szembeni védelem
          • 31 - Tisztességes és igazságos munkafeltételek
          • 32 - A gyermekmunka tilalma és a fiatalok munkahelyi védelme
          • 33 - A család és a munka
          • 34 - A szociális biztonság és a szociális segítségnyújtás
          • 35 - Egészségvédelem
          • 36 - Az általános gazdasági érdekű szolgáltatásokhoz való hozzáférés
          • 37 - Környezetvédelem
          • 38 - A fogyasztók védelme
        • V. Cím: A polgárok jogai
          • 39 - Aktív és passzív választójog az európai parlamenti választásokon
          • 40 - Aktív és passzív választójog a helyhatósági választásokon
          • 41 - A megfelelő ügyintézéshez való jog
          • 42 - A dokumentumokhoz való hozzáférés joga
          • 43 - Az európai ombudsman
          • 44 - A petíciós jog
          • 45 - A mozgás és a tartózkodás szabadsága
          • 46 - A diplomáciai és konzuli védelem
        • VI. Cím: Igazságszolgáltatás
          • 47 - A hatékony jogorvoslathoz és a tisztességes eljáráshoz való jog
          • 48 - Az ártatlanság vélelme és a védelemhez való jog
          • 49 - A bűncselekmények és büntetések törvényességének és arányosságának elvei
          • 50 - A kétszeres eljárás alá vonás és a kétszeres büntetés tilalma
        • VII. Cím: Általános rendelkezések
          • 51 - Alkalmazási kör
          • 52 - A jogok és elvek hatálya és értelmezése
          • 53 - A védelem szintje
          • 54 - A joggal való visszaélés tilalma
      • Tools
        • EU Fundamental Rights Information System - EFRIS
        • Criminal detention database
        • Anti-Muslim hatred database
        • National human rights structures navigator
        • Case-law database
        • Charterpedia
        • FRA e-learning platform
        • Data visualisation
        • Equality data collection: promising practices
        • Fighting hate crime: promising practices
      • Termékek
    • About FRA
      • Who we are
        • Structure of FRA
        • Management Board
          • Management Board members
          • Management Board meeting documents
        • Executive Board
        • Scientific Committee
          • Scientific Committee members
        • Director
        • Management team
      • What we do
        • Research and data
        • Capacity-building
        • Advising
        • Convening people
        • FRA for children
          • What are my rights?
          • Where do my rights come from?
        • Areas of work
          • Multi-annual Framework 2007-2022
        • Work Programme
          • Archive
        • Annual Activity report
          • Archive
        • Projects
      • Working at FRA
        • Vacancies and selections
          • Previous vacancies
        • What we offer
        • Work-life balance
        • Application instructions
        • Seconded National Experts
        • Traineeship
        • Study visits at FRA
      • Procurement
        • Ongoing procedures
        • Closed procedures
        • Contracts awarded
      • Finance and budget
        • Financial Rules
        • Financial documents
      • A dokumentumokhoz való hozzáférés
        • Access to documents
        • A dokumentumokhoz való hozzáférés iránti kérelem
      • Data protection within FRA
        • Records registry
    • Cooperation
      • Uniós intézmények és más szervek
        • European Parliament
        • Council of the European Union
        • European Commission
        • EU agencies
          • Justice and Home Affairs Agencies Network
        • European Committee of the Regions
        • European Economic and Social Committee
        • European Ombudsman
        • EU CRPD Framework
          • Promotion
          • Protection
          • Monitoring
          • Review process
          • Resources
      • Az EU tagállamai
        • National Liaison Officers
        • National Parliaments
      • Európa Tanács
      • A civil társadalom és az alapjogi platform
        • Activities
        • Civic space
        • Platform library
        • How to register
      • Nemzeti emberi jogi intézmények, egyenlőségi szervek és ombudsmani intézmények
      • Az ENSZ, az EBESZ és más nemzetközi szervezetek
        • EEA and Norway Grants
      • FRANET
    • Newsroom
      • Media contacts
      • News
      • Press releases
      • Stories
      • Events
        • Past Events
      • FRA products 2026
        • FRA products 2025
        • FRA products 2024
        • FRA products 2023
        • FRA products 2022
        • FRA products 2021
        • FRA Products 2020
        • FRA Products 2019
      • Multimedia
        • Videos
        • Infographics
        • Podcasts
      • Speeches
      • Press packs
        • EU LGBTIQ survey - Press pack
        • Fundamental Rights Survey
        • EU LGBTI survey II
        • From institutions to community living for persons with disabilities: perspectives from the ground
        • Second European Union Minorities and Discrimination Survey – Main results
        • Second European Union Minorities and Discrimination Survey (EU-MIDIS II) Muslims
        • Together in the EU: Promoting the participation of migrants and their descendants
        • Second European Union Minorities and Discrimination Survey (EU-MIDIS II) Roma
        • Severe labour exploitation in the EU
        • Child-friendly justice – perspectives and experiences of professionals: Press pack
        • Fundamental rights at EU borders
        • Violence against women press pack
        • Jewish people’s experiences and perceptions of hate crime, discrimination and antisemitism
        • EU LGBT Press pack
        • Child-friendly justice – perspectives and experiences of children
      • Newsletter
    • Account
      • Log in

Main menu

Home
  • Work on rights
    Work on rights
    • Igazságszolgáltatás, a sértettek jogai és igazságügyi együttműködés
      • Bűncselekmények áldozatainak jogai
      • Vádlottak jogai
      • Polgári igazságszolgáltatás
      • Igazságügyi együttműködés és jogállamiság
      • Biztonság
      • Üzleti tevékenység és emberi jogok
    • Egyenlőség, megkülönböztetésmentesség és rasszizmus
      • Gyermekek, fiatalok és idősebbek
      • Fogyatékossággal élők
      • Gyűlölet-bűncselekmények
      • Faji és etnikai származás
      • Vallás és meggyőződés
      • Romák
      • Nem, szexuális irányultság és társadalmi nem
    • Menedékjog, migráció és határok
      • A menekültügyi eljárásokhoz való hozzáférés
      • Határok és információs rendszerek
      • Gyermekvédelem
      • Irreguláris migráció, visszaküldés és idegenrendészeti őrizet
      • Legális migráció és integráció
      • Emberkereskedelem és munkaerő-kizsákmányolás
    • Adatvédelem, magánélet és új technológiák
      • Mesterséges intelligencia és nagy adathalmazok
      • Határok és információs rendszerek
      • Adatvédelem
      • Jogellenes profilalkotás
    • Az emberi jogi rendszerek és jogvédők támogatása
      • Az Európai Unió Alapjogi Chartája
      • Kormányközi emberi jogi rendszerek
      • Nemzeti emberi jogi rendszerek és szervek
      • Civil társadalom
    • Environmental and social sustainability
      • Climate change and environmental protection
      • Just and green transition
      • Business and human rights
      • Human rights due diligence
      • Consumer protection
  • Az EU Alapjogi Chartája
    Az EU Alapjogi Chartája
    • Mik azok az alapvető jogok?
    • What is the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights?
    • Preambulum
    • I. Cím: Méltóság
      • 1 - Az emberi méltóság
      • 2 - Az élethez való jog
      • 3 - A személyi sérthetetlenséghez való jog
      • 4 - A kínzás és az embertelen vagy megalázó bánásmód és büntetés tilalma
      • 5 - A rabszolgaság és a kényszermunka tilalma
    • II. Cím: Szabadságok
      • 6 - A szabadsághoz és biztonsághoz való jog
      • 7 - A magán
      • 8 - A személyes adatok védelme
      • 9 - A házasságkötéshez és a családalapításhoz való jog
      • 10 - A gondolat-, a lelkiismeret
      • 11 - A véleménynyilvánítás és a tájékozódás szabadsága
      • 12 - A gyülekezés és az egyesülés szabadsága
      • 13 - A művészet és a tudomány szabadsága
      • 14 - Az oktatáshoz való jog
      • 15 - A foglalkozás megválasztásának szabadsága és a munkavállaláshoz való jog
      • 16 - A vállalkozás szabadsága
      • 17 - A tulajdonhoz való jog
      • 18 - A menedékjog
      • 19 - Védelem a kitoloncolással, a kiutasítással és a kiadatással szemben
    • III. Cím: Egyenlőség
      • 20 - A törvény előtti egyenlőség
      • 21 - A megkülönböztetés tilalma
      • 22 - A kulturális, vallási és nyelvi sokféleség
      • 23 - A nők és férfiak közötti egyenlőség
      • 24 - A gyermekek jogai
      • 25 - Az idősek jogai
      • 26 - A fogyatékkal élő személyek beilleszkedése
    • IV. Cím: Szolidaritás
      • 27 - A munkavállalók joga a vállalkozásnál a tájékoztatáshoz és konzultációhoz
      • 28 - A kollektív tárgyaláshoz és fellépéshez való jog
      • 29 - A munkaközvetítői szolgáltatások igénybevételéhez való jog
      • 30 - Az indokolatlan elbocsátással szembeni védelem
      • 31 - Tisztességes és igazságos munkafeltételek
      • 32 - A gyermekmunka tilalma és a fiatalok munkahelyi védelme
      • 33 - A család és a munka
      • 34 - A szociális biztonság és a szociális segítségnyújtás
      • 35 - Egészségvédelem
      • 36 - Az általános gazdasági érdekű szolgáltatásokhoz való hozzáférés
      • 37 - Környezetvédelem
      • 38 - A fogyasztók védelme
    • V. Cím: A polgárok jogai
      • 39 - Aktív és passzív választójog az európai parlamenti választásokon
      • 40 - Aktív és passzív választójog a helyhatósági választásokon
      • 41 - A megfelelő ügyintézéshez való jog
      • 42 - A dokumentumokhoz való hozzáférés joga
      • 43 - Az európai ombudsman
      • 44 - A petíciós jog
      • 45 - A mozgás és a tartózkodás szabadsága
      • 46 - A diplomáciai és konzuli védelem
    • VI. Cím: Igazságszolgáltatás
      • 47 - A hatékony jogorvoslathoz és a tisztességes eljáráshoz való jog
      • 48 - Az ártatlanság vélelme és a védelemhez való jog
      • 49 - A bűncselekmények és büntetések törvényességének és arányosságának elvei
      • 50 - A kétszeres eljárás alá vonás és a kétszeres büntetés tilalma
    • VII. Cím: Általános rendelkezések
      • 51 - Alkalmazási kör
      • 52 - A jogok és elvek hatálya és értelmezése
      • 53 - A védelem szintje
      • 54 - A joggal való visszaélés tilalma
  • Tools
    Tools
    • EU Fundamental Rights Information System - EFRIS
    • Criminal detention database
    • Anti-Muslim hatred database
    • National human rights structures navigator
    • Case-law database
    • Charterpedia
    • FRA e-learning platform
    • Data visualisation
    • Equality data collection: promising practices
    • Fighting hate crime: promising practices
  • Termékek

You are here

  • Home
  • Work On Rights
  • Environmental and social sustainability
  • Human rights due diligence
  • A Human Rights Approach to Due Diligence: Reflections on key principles
22
October
2025

A Human Rights Approach to Due Diligence: Reflections on key principles

Human rights due diligence
Equality, non-discrimination and racism
Justice, victims’ rights and judicial cooperation
Environmental and social sustainability
This publication discusses how businesses can meet their human rights and environmental responsibilities. It focuses on key elements of mandatory human rights due diligence and presents reflections on principles from international law and EU law. The paper explains why risk-based human rights due diligence is needed and how it should be implemented. It also highlights the importance of stakeholder engagement, access to remedies, and oversight. It aims to inform EU policymakers and stakeholders about ways to effectively promote responsible business conduct and to ensure adequate protection of rightsholders.
Read news item
  • Read Online
  • Related
Export to PDF
Search inside this publication
  • Executive summary
  • Introduction
  • 1. Why is mandatory human rights due diligence needed?
    • 1.1 The EU context
  • 2. A risk-based approach within human rights due diligence
    • 2.1. Business responsibility to respect human rights
    • 2.2. Risk-based approach to identification and assessment of adverse impacts
    • 2.3. Shared responsibility in implementing due diligence across the chain of activities
    • 2.4. Ongoing monitoring in line with a risk-based approach
    • 2.5. A risk-based approach to responsible disengagement
  • 3. Stakeholder engagement
    • 3.1. Conditions and stages of effective stakeholder engagement
  • 4. Access to effective remedies and civil liability
    • 4.1. Civil liability provisions and due diligence obligations
    • 4.2. Overriding mandatory application
    • 4.3. Representation of victims in civil proceedings for effective access to justice
  • 5. Oversight and enforcement
    • 5.1. Supervisory authorities
    • 5.2. Dissuasive penalties and their uniform application
  • About this publication


4. Access to effective remedies and civil liability

Companies have a responsibility to respect human rights, and Member States have an obligation to protect human rights and ensure that business activities do not infringe on these rights. Member States must also take appropriate steps to ensure that when business-related human rights abuses occur in their territory or under their jurisdiction, they provide effective remedy through judicial, administrative, legislative or other appropriate means [68]
 UNGP 25 and its commentary.
.

The right to an effective remedy is enshrined in Article 47 of the Charter, and it is a general principle of EU law [69] Case 222/84 Johnston [1986] ECR 1651.
Judgment of 15 October 1987, Case 222/86 Heylens [1987] ECR 4097.
Judgment of 3 December 1992, Case C-97/91 Borelli [1992] ECR I-6313.
. The EU and its Member States are bound to ensure that everyone in the EU can effectively enjoy this right. It is key to realising and protecting other fundamental rights: it provides that if a person’s rights have been violated, that person can seek and obtain remedy in court.

Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial

Everyone whose rights and freedoms guaranteed by the law of the Union are violated has the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal in compliance with the conditions laid down in this Article.

Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law. Everyone shall have the possibility of being advised, defended and represented.

Legal aid shall be made available to those who lack sufficient resources in so far as such aid is necessary to ensure effective access to justice.

Remediation is also one of the three pillars of the UNGPs framework, which calls on businesses to remediate harms linked to their activities, and the states to ensure that victims of corporate human rights abuses can access justice. The commentary to Principle 26 UNGP recognises that “[e]ffective judicial mechanisms are at the core of ensuring access to remedy” [70]
 UN Human Rights Council, ‘Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” framework’, pp. 28-29.
.

In practice, significant gaps exist in terms of remediation for business-related human rights abuses. The CSDDD civil liability provisions provide mechanisms to bridge some of these gaps to ensure an adequate level of protection for potential victims and better harmonisation across the EU.


4.1. Civil liability provisions and due diligence obligations

In general, civil liability refers to private law mechanisms through which persons can seek remedy for damage resulting from violations of their rights. It is an important avenue for victims of business human rights abuses to seek remedy. As underlined in the UN Human Rights Council report on the topic, legal liability mechanisms should support meaningful HRDD [71]
 UN Human Rights Council, ‘Improving accountability and access to remedy for victims of business-related human rights abuse: The relevance of human rights due diligence to determinations of corporate liability’, A/HRC/38/20/Add.2, 2018, paragraph 45.
.

In the context of the EU, Article 29 of the CSDDD introduces the civil liability regime. It does not introduce a fully harmonised civil liability regime across the EU, but includes important safeguards aimed to address the specific context of HRDD in complex corporate value chains: civil liability is clearly linked to breach of the due diligence obligations under the directive, and thus to upholding accountability [72]
 Bernaz, N., Bueno, N., Holly, G. and Martin-Ortega, O., ‘The EU Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence: The final political compromise’, Business and Human Rights Journal, Vol. 9, Issue 2, 2024, pp. 294–300.
and to increased legal certainty for both companies and potential victims.

Harmonising civil liability regimes across the EU would provide companies and rights holders with clarity on obligations and the consequences of failing to meet due diligence standards, thereby increasing legal certainty both for companies across the internal market and for potential victims.

Given the importance of legal certainty, it is essential that there be clarity about the conditions under which companies can be held liable, such as those outlined in Article 29(1) of the CSDDD. This provision establishes two criteria for civil liability rooted in HRDD obligations: (a) companies can be held liable if they intentionally or negligently failed to address adverse impacts in their due diligence process; (b) as a result of the failure referred to in point (a), damage was caused to the natural or legal person’s legal interests that are protected under national law [73] Civil liability is linked specifically to the obligations set out in Articles 10 and 11.
. This minimum standard may address certain existing challenges facing victims of corporate human rights abuses. Although civil liability regimes exist in the legal systems of many Member States, they often differ not only in how they define the criteria for liability but also in the extent to which they hold companies liable for abuses across their corporate structures and value chains. Currently, interpretations of the required standard of behaviour of companies and the attribution of liability across corporate value chains are determined by existing national laws, in a legal landscape across the EU characterised by divergences and gaps [74]
 Holly, G. and Zerk, J., Access to Justice in the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive: Symposium event report, Danish Institute for Human Rights, Copenhagen, 2025.
. Moreover, existing national frameworks often fail to adequately address the reality and complexity of disputes involving large corporations across intricate, global value chains. In clearly linking civil liability to due diligence obligations, the CSDDD bridges some of these gaps.


4.2. Overriding mandatory application

Overriding mandatory application ensures that the legal obligations and liability rules established by a Member State’s national laws on HRDD apply regardless of which jurisdictions’ law would otherwise govern a dispute under private international law. As a principle, it helps promote regulatory coherence by ensuring that Member States’ HRDD regimes prevail in disputes and by discouraging regulatory arbitrage where companies may seek out jurisdictions with more lax rules [75]
 Kramer X. and Silva de Freitas, E., ‘The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive: PIL and Litigation Aspects’, 2024.
. It enhances corporate accountability and improves victims’ access to remedies despite the cross-border complexities.

The CSDDD in Article 29(7) requires that national law implementing its civil liability provisions have overriding mandatory application whenever the law governing related claims is not that of a Member State. This means that courts that adjudicate civil liability cases will have to refer to the national law implementing the CSDDD civil liability rules – ensuring that companies will be held accountable in line with the standards set out by the CSDDD.

Such a provision is essential to ensuring legal certainty and predictability. Without this provision, the law of the Member State where the damage occurred is likely to be applied according to private international law rules for non-contractual obligations [76] Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations prescribes in Article 4(1) that the law of the Member State in which the damage occurs is applicable as the default rule. This will also be the law applicable to environmental damage, unless the claimant chooses to base their claim on the law of the Member State in which the event giving rise to the damage occurred (Article 7(1)).
. Consequently, EU national courts may, following conflict-of-law rules and national discretion, apply the law of a non-EU country, which can differ in terms of human rights and environmental protection, scope of liability and other substantive law elements.

As the previous FRA report ‘Business and human rights – access to remedy’ (2020) found, applicable law presents a key legal obstacle for access to justice for victims of business-related human rights abuses. The absence of an overriding mandatory application has far-reaching consequences with respect to legal predictability for companies, the internal market, and rights holders. Regulation avoids unfairly penalising companies that carry out due diligence in line with the international standards by allowing their competitors to ‘forum shop’ and avoid accountability for profiting from activities that negatively impact human rights.

Additionally, the failure to regulate mandatory application risks prompting a race to the bottom among Member States, where companies might relocate to jurisdictions with more lenient civil liability rules or weaker enforcement, encouraging governments to follow suit in legal and regulatory terms, ultimately undermining human rights protection standards [77] See also endnote 75.
.


4.3. Representation of victims in civil proceedings for effective access to justice


The FRA report ‘Business and human rights – access to remedy’ (2020) identified major obstacles for victims seeking justice in relation to business-related human rights abuses [78] Based on findings from fieldwork research in selected EU Member States – Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland and Sweden – and the United Kingdom (data collection was conducted before the EU–UK withdrawal agreement entered into force).
. The effectiveness of judicial remedies is often hampered by restrictive rules on legal standing, evidence and disclosure barriers, high legal costs (combined with restrictive rules on legal aid) and the striking imbalance of arms in general. Accessing the courts in practice is very difficult, especially as victims of business-related human rights abuses are often already in vulnerable situations. This includes victims from outside the EU, where the most severe human rights violations occur [79]
 García Esteban, A. and Patz, C., Suing Goliath – An analysis of civil cases against EU companies for overseas human rights and environmental abuses and environmental harm in their global operations and value chains, and key recommendations to improve access to judicial remedy, European Coalition for Corporate Justice, Brussels, 2021.


Dubost, C. and Potier, D., Rapport d'information déposé en application de l'article 145-7 alinéa 1 du règlement, par la commission des lois constitutionnelles, de la législation et de l'administration générale de la République sur l’évaluation de la loi du 27 mars 2017 relative au devoir de vigilance des sociétés mères et des entreprises donneuses d’ordre, 2022.
.

Previous FRA opinion on ensuring access to justice for victims of business-related human rights abuses:

Previous FRA opinion on ensuring access to justice for victims of business-related human rights abuses:

The EU and Member States should ensure that legislation providing for representative action on behalf of persons affected by the actions of a business allows for legal standing of civil society organisations acting in the public interest, as well as statutory human rights organisations, such as national human rights institutions, Ombuds institutions or equality bodies.

Source: FRA, ‘Business and human rights – access to remedy’ (2020), opinion 2.

Procedural safeguards are part of the effective regulation of businesses’ responsibility to respect human rights. The CSDDD provides certain such safeguards, including provisions on the statute of limitations, the disclosure and costs of proceedings and victims’ ability to authorise certain organisations to bring an action to enforce their rights – aimed at addressing persistent barriers to access to justice faced by victims of human rights abuse by businesses [80] See CSDDD, Article 29(3).
.

Previous FRA research [81]
 FRA, Enforcing consumer rights to combat greenwashing, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2024.
shows that the rules on whether NGOs can take part in lawsuits about consumer and environmental rights differ between Member States, which can make cases against multinational companies more complicated. In some Member States, NGOs may bring a case even if their own rights or interests are not directly affected. In others, an NGO’s action based on its goals, such as protecting the environment, may be rejected in consumer-related cases because the NGO does not have the required legal standing.

For victims, who are often those most vulnerable or marginalised, the possibility of such representation is vital to access justice. While some Member States allow for similar representation, this is not uniform across all EU jurisdictions.

Establishing clear liability frameworks and harmonised regimes that define and enforce the standard of conduct for HRDD is essential in ensuring effective access to remedies for potential victims of corporate abuse. This can improve accountability by providing courts with a firmer legal foundation to hold parent companies liable for harms linked to their business activity, while at the same time increasing legal certainty for these companies navigating the complex legal systems of the numerous jurisdictions in which they may operate. Clarity and harmonisation of access to justice provisions can help advance justice and accountability for victims and legal certainty and predictability for companies.

3. Stakeholder engagement5. Oversight and enforcement
Related
FRA, 2026
Opinion / Position Paper
Environmental and social sustainability
Climate change and environmental protection
Consumer protection
25
February
2026

Opinion on Draft Simplified European Sustainability Reporting Standards

This FRA Opinion on the draft simplified European Sustainability Reporting Standards informs the European Commission ahead of the standards’ adoption. This Opinion applies a risk-based human rights approach to assess whether the proposed simplifications preserve essential safeguards for people adversely affected by corporate activities. The Opinion provides practical, proportionate suggestions to strengthen the simplified framework and ensure that efficiency gains do not come at the expense of fundamental rights.
Creative collage of law and justice, gavel and scales
BillionPhotos.com / adobestock.com, 2025
Report / Paper / Summary
EU Charter of Fundamental Rights
Support for human rights systems and defenders
8
December
2025

Better legislation – Human rights impact assessments in lawmaking

This report examines how human rights impact assessments (HRIAs) are built into lawmaking across the EU and its Member States. It highlights that, although progress has been made, the use of HRIAs remains uneven and often superficial. In many EU countries, the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights is frequently overlooked. The report identifies insufficient consultation with external experts, limited stakeholder participation and a lack of evaluation once laws are in force. To address these gaps, it offers practical recommendations for more systematic, inclusive and evidence-based HRIAs that strengthen human rights protection and ensure better, more accountable legislation throughout the EU.
Read news item
Industry smoking chimneys with forest overlay.
Report / Paper / Summary
Consumer protection
Justice, victims’ rights and judicial cooperation
Environmental and social sustainability
7
March
2024

Enforcing consumer rights to combat greenwashing

Tackling greenwashing is an issue where human rights, consumer rights and climate goals align. Companies use greenwashing to convince people to buy products that are not always as environmentally friendly as they claim to be. They mislead consumers and harm the environment. This report shows how a human rights approach can combat greenwashing. It is based on consultations with experts in 10 Member States. The report identifies gaps in existing laws and enforcement. It includes case studies of consumers seeking remedies for misleading environmental claims.
Read news item
Woman watching a virtual screen
HQUALITY © adobestock.com, 2020
Report / Paper / Summary
Artificial intelligence and big data
Data protection, privacy and new technologies
14
December
2020
Slovenian version now available
20 December 2024

Getting the future right – Artificial intelligence and fundamental rights

Artificial intelligence (AI) already plays a role in deciding what unemployment benefits someone gets, where a burglary is likely to take place, whether someone is at risk of cancer, or who sees that catchy advertisement for low mortgage rates. Its use keeps growing, presenting seemingly endless possibilities. But we need to make sure to fully uphold fundamental rights standards when using AI. This report presents concrete examples of how companies and public administrations in the EU are using, or trying to use, AI. It focuses on four core areas – social benefits, predictive policing, health services and targeted advertising.
Read the press release
Watch the launch video
Read press release
© Freshideas / Adobestock
Report / Paper / Summary
Business and human rights
Justice, victims’ rights and judicial cooperation
Environmental and social sustainability
Business and human rights
6
October
2020

Business and human rights – access to remedy

Business activity affects not just customers, employees, and contractors along supply chains, but often entire communities and the environment. This makes it vital that every business complies with human rights. This comparative report looks at the realities victims face when they seek redress for business-related human rights abuses. It presents the findings of fieldwork research on the views of professionals regarding the different ways people can pursue complaints. The findings highlight that obstacles to achieving justice are often multi-layered.
Read news item
Az FRA-RÓL

Bővebb információ az Ügynökségről és tevékenységéről.

  • Az FRA-ról
  • az Európai Unió Alapjogi Chartája
  • Hová fordulhat segítségért?
  • Hírek
  • Iratkozzon fel híreinkre
Kapcsolat
Address
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights
Schwarzenbergplatz 11
A-1040 Vienna, Austria
E-mail
Írjon nekünk
Newsletter
Iratkozzon fel híreinkre!s
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Newsletter
  • E-mail
  • RSS

© European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, 2007-2026

  • About this website
  • Legal notice
  • Cookies
  • Data Protection
  • Accessibility