You are here:

Key facts of the case: 

The Law of 28 April 2015 reforms the court office fees. Instead of being fixed, those fees are set in proportion to the value of the claim. Furthermore, a court office fee is added for labour and fiscal cases for requests of relatively high value. The parties argue that those added fees violate the right to access to a judge, because they would make it harder for poorer citizens to access a judge. They put forward alleged violation of Articles 10, 11 and 13 of the Consitution combined with Articles 6 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. 

Outcome of the case:

The Court annulled the contested dispositions based on discrimination between litigants on the basis of the claim’s value, which is not pertinent to achieving the goal pursued by the legislator.